Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
David Pichler vs Clement Geens Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Pichler vs Geens analysis and find out who is favored!
David Pichler vs Clement Geens Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pichler has won 50.42% of points on his second serve, while Geens has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pichler, in recent form, has won 53.59% of his opponent's second serve points, while Geens has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.65% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pichler has saved 56.43% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Geens has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pichler has won 45.9% of matches played (W/L 28/ 33), with Geens winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pichler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 121/ 82), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Geens has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 49/ 23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 19/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Pichler has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 52.63% of matches (W/L 20/ 18), where as Geens has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pichler winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Pichler winning 2 and Geens winning 1. The last match between Pichler and Geens was at the Poland F4 (Ustron), 22-05-2018, First, Clay with David Pichler getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:33:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pichler and Geens have played a deciding set 1 times, with Pichler winning 1 times and Geens 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Pichler winning 0, and Geens 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pichler has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.36 while Geens has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pichler has won 29% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Geens has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pichler has converted 45.4% of breakpoint opportunities, and Geens has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Pichler 1 - 0 Geens
574
Rank
390
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
245
High
28
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
L
56% (340-264)
Career Total W/L
61% (228-144)
44% (7-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | David Pichler | Clement Geens |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:33:0 | 2:33:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (57/81) | 60% (58/96) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (34/57) | 60% (35/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (11/24) | 37% (14/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 50% (5/10) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (47/96) | 44% (36/81) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-6 7-5 6-2 |
Stats 
David Pichler
Player
Clement Geens
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
47 of
96)
92
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | David Pichler | Clement Geens |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (19/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 50% (175/172) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.31 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 53 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 47 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:45:6 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 300.19 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (673/1070) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (462/673) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (196/397) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (46/103) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (442/1112) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (7/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 29% (2/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 75% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 25% (8/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (0/0) |
David Pichler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Gabriele Vulpitta
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
46%
(
33 of
71)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
7
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
72
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
David Pichler
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
David Pichler
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
4
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
11
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
28 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
88
Total Points Won
88
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Roberto Cid Subervi
Player
David Pichler
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Christian Langmo
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
64%
(
56 of
88)
4
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
43 of
56)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
30 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
David Pichler
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
31 of
46)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Akram El Sallaly
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
David Pichler
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Laurent Lokoli
Player
David Pichler
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
80%
(
35 of
44)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
44
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Pichler
Player
Daniel Michalski
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Clement Geens Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Clement Geens
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
70%
(
32 of
46)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
46
Total Points Won
53
|
3-6 3-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Benjamin Hassan
73%
(
51 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Sem Verbeek
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
51 of
72)
1st Serve %
69%
(
70 of
102)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
33%
(
6 of
18)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
51 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Lenny Hampel
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
69%
(
55 of
80)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
47%
(
33 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
73
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
50 of
78)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
21 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
78)
82
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alexis Musialek
Player
Clement Geens
69%
(
11 of
16)
1st Serve %
44%
(
7 of
16)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
45%
(
5 of
11)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
60%
(
3 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
12 of
16)
20
Total Points Won
12
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
83%
(
43 of
52)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
0
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Zizou Bergs
74%
(
51 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
28%
(
5 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
45 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
70
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Geens
Player
Eleftherios Theodorou
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
22 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Pichler Vs Geens Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
