Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daria Saville vs Naomi Broady Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Saville vs Broady analysis and find out who is favored!
Daria Saville vs Naomi Broady Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Saville has won 43.53% of points on his second serve, while Broady has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Saville, in recent form, has won 58.44% of his opponent's second serve points, while Broady has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.56% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Saville has saved 58.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broady has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Saville has won 54.17% of matches played (W/L 26/ 22), with Broady winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Saville has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 180/ 133), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 20/ 26). Broady has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 56% (W/L 111/ 87), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 38/ 56).
- Player level: In the last year, Saville has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 21/ 12), where as Broady has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Saville winning 2 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Saville winning 4 and Broady winning 4. The last match between Saville and Broady was at the Australian Open - Melbourne, 17-01-2017, First, Hard with Daria Saville getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:41.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Saville and Broady have played a deciding set 2 times, with Saville winning 2 times and Broady 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Saville winning 0, and Broady 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Saville has played against opponents with an average rank of 169.94 while Broady has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Saville has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broady has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Saville has converted 52.65% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broady has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Saville 2 - 1 Broady
95
Rank
20
High
30
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
76
High
34
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
Form
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
56% (314-249)
Career Total W/L
53% (378-339)
61% (14-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,297,167
Career Prize Money
$329,987
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daria Saville | Naomi Broady |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 4 |
| Games Won | 40 | 38 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 31 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:21:41 | 1:21:41 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (110/173) | 63% (116/184) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (86/110) | 70% (81/116) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (30/63) | 46% (31/68) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (8/19) | 56% (5/9) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (72/184) | 33% (57/173) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 7-5 |
Stats 
Daria Saville
Player
Naomi Broady
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
52 of
85)
5
Aces
19
3
Double Faults
0
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
| 4-6 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Naomi Broady
58%
(
53 of
92)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
3
Aces
12
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daria Saville | Naomi Broady |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (14/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (32/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (286/242) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.23 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 60 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.47 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 123 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:38 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 143.61 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (1212/1805) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 62% (747/1212) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 43% (256/593) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 55% (117/211) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (830/1732) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (12/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (14/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Daria Saville Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 2 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Marcela Zacarias
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
67%
(
24 of
36)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elina Svitolina
Player
Daria Saville
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
71%
(
45 of
63)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
45%
(
25 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Tamara Korpatsch
76%
(
69 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
46%
(
42 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
39 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Heather Watson
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
68%
(
40 of
59)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Grace Min
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
76%
(
32 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dayana Yastremska
Player
Daria Saville
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
76%
(
66 of
87)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Shuai Zhang
75%
(
82 of
109)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
33%
(
9 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
50%
(
55 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
53 of
108)
107
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernarda Pera
Player
Daria Saville
70%
(
90 of
128)
1st Serve %
56%
(
72 of
129)
1
Aces
2
12
Double Faults
13
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
26%
(
10 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
41%
(
9 of
22)
Break Points Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
51%
(
65 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
66 of
129)
129
Total Points Won
128
|
7-5 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Daria Saville
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
47%
(
15 of
32)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
53%
(
30 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
35 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Tatjana Maria
69%
(
96 of
140)
1st Serve %
61%
(
59 of
96)
4
Aces
3
13
Double Faults
6
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
45%
(
63 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
123
Total Points Won
113
|
5-7 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Naomi Broady Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Kurumi Nara
Player
Naomi Broady
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
26 of
31)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Svenja Ochsner
Player
Naomi Broady
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
3
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
32 of
59)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
44 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
95)
93
Total Points Won
90
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naomi Broady
Player
Dasha Plekhanova
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve %
78%
(
54 of
69)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alice Rame
Player
Naomi Broady
86%
(
55 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naomi Broady
Player
Heike Janse Van Vuuren
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Isabella Kruger
Player
Naomi Broady
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve %
54%
(
20 of
37)
0
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
14 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naomi Broady
Player
Doroteja Joksovic
53%
(
39 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
24 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Naiktha Bains
Player
Naomi Broady
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naomi Broady
Player
Sem Hazes
46%
(
25 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
6
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
12
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Renata Zarazua
Player
Naomi Broady
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve %
41%
(
16 of
39)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Saville Vs Broady Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
