Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daria Frayman vs Natsumi Kawaguchi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Frayman vs Kawaguchi analysis and find out who is favored!
Daria Frayman vs Natsumi Kawaguchi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Frayman has won 53.18% of points on his second serve, while Kawaguchi has won 41.49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Frayman, in recent form, has won 65.45% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kawaguchi has won 52.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.64% and 39.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Frayman has saved 55.34% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kawaguchi has saved 47.93% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Frayman has won 79.41% of matches played (W/L 27/ 7), with Kawaguchi winning 48.72% (W/L 19/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Frayman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 79% (W/L 27/ 7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5). Kawaguchi has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 5/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Frayman has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 80% of matches (W/L 24/ 6), where as Kawaguchi has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40% of matches (W/L 12/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Frayman has played against opponents with an average rank of 128 while Kawaguchi has played against players with an average rank of 189.41.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Frayman has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kawaguchi has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Frayman has converted 49.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kawaguchi has converted 42.98% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Frayman 0 - 0 Kawaguchi
783
Rank
783
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
395
Rank
346
High
21
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
72% (31-12)
Career Total W/L
61% (78-49)
63% (10-6)
YTD W/L
33% (2-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$8,310
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daria Frayman | Natsumi Kawaguchi |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (10/6) | 33% (2/4) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (20/13) | 40% (6/9) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (155/117) | 46% (60/71) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 33% (2/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 6 | 4 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 26 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:39:52 | 1:48:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 162.94 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 80% (691/864) | 72% (294/409) |
| 1st Serve W% | 58% (399/691) | 58% (171/294) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 53% (92/173) | 37% (43/115) |
| BPs Won% Total | 50% (67/135) | 44% (24/54) |
| Return Pts W% | 50% (480/964) | 45% (199/439) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (3/1) | 25% (1/3) |
| Futures W/L | 58% (7/5) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (9/15) | 33% (2/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 33% (1/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 91% (11/10) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 9% (11/1) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Daria Frayman Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Fabienne Gettwart
Player
Daria Frayman
67%
(
66 of
98)
1st Serve %
80%
(
64 of
80)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
51%
(
50 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
47 of
80)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Yujin Ahn
87%
(
68 of
78)
1st Serve %
73%
(
48 of
66)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
57%
(
39 of
68)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Yujin Kim
89%
(
31 of
35)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
100%
(
4 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
14%
(
5 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Yoana Moneva
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve %
36%
(
12 of
33)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
76%
(
25 of
33)
49
Total Points Won
14
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Daria Frayman
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
83%
(
40 of
48)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
0
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
13%
(
2 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Mariam Atia
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
75%
(
39 of
52)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Isabelle Lacy
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
5
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
100%
(
6 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
9 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Marie Weckerle
Player
Daria Frayman
76%
(
51 of
67)
1st Serve %
78%
(
50 of
64)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Katarina Kuzmova
93%
(
26 of
28)
1st Serve %
57%
(
8 of
14)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
39%
(
11 of
28)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
24
Total Points Won
17
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daria Frayman
Player
Laura Galdano
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve %
78%
(
32 of
41)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
8 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Natsumi Kawaguchi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sara Saito
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Miho Kuramochi
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ikumi Yamazaki
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
69%
(
62 of
90)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
84
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Risako Togashi
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
10 of
32)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
48%
(
23 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kayo Nishimura
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
80%
(
51 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
31%
(
4 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
26 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
2-6 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Mio Mushika
68%
(
76 of
112)
1st Serve %
47%
(
57 of
122)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
11
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
49 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
60 of
122)
123
Total Points Won
111
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Mai Hontama
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
En Shuo Liang
60%
(
53 of
89)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
5
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
85
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luksika Kumkhum
Player
Natsumi Kawaguchi
69%
(
66 of
96)
1st Serve %
71%
(
73 of
103)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
48 of
103)
101
Total Points Won
98
|
6-3 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natsumi Kawaguchi
Player
Rinon Okuwaki
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Frayman Vs Kawaguchi Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
