Daniil Sarksian vs Michael Zhu Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Oct at 09:02 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Sarksian vs M. Zhu

RUS
0
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Sarksian 0 - 1 Zhu
They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniil Sarksian winning 0 and Michael Zhu winning 2. The last match between Michael Zhu and Daniil Sarksian was at the M15 Hua Hin, 22-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Michael Zhu getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Sarksian | 0 |
| Zhu | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Hua Hin(10-22-25)
D. Sarksian vs M. Zhu H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 41.07% (23-33) | Career Total W/L | 50.96% (265-255) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Sarksian vs M. Zhu Match Preview:
- In recent performance, Daniil Sarksian has a second serve win rate of 42.66%, slightly lower than Michael Zhu's 42.92%. Could this small difference influence the outcome? Yes, given how closely matched their service game statistics are.
- On return stats, Michael has a slight edge, capturing 47.69% of opponents' second serve points compared to Daniil's 44.99%. For first serve returns, Michael again leads slightly at 28.77% over Daniil's 28.17%.
- Under pressure, Michael has demonstrated better breakpoint resilience with a 51.37% save rate, compared to Daniil's 48.72%, which indicates calmer handling in pivotal moments.
- Looking at overall match wins in the past year, Michael Zhu has a superior win percentage of 45.31%, whereas Daniil Sarksian has 38.46%.
- Both players have their strongest performances on different surfaces. Daniil's best is I.hard with a 50% win rate, whereas Michael excels on Hard at 50%, pointing to surface preferences that could dictate play.
- In tournament participation, both frequent Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, but Michael has garnered more wins at this level (45.31% vs. 38.46%).
- Michael's opponents over the past year have had stronger average rankings (326.41) than Daniil's (518.56), indicating experience against higher-caliber players.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Michael has a slight edge again, winning 48% of such sets compared to Daniil's 47%.
Editorial Prediction (October 22, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the key statistics leading up to this match, Michael Zhu appears to have a consistent edge over Daniil Sarksian in several areas. Despite their close match on certain performance indicators, Zhu's slightly stronger second serve performance, superior return game, and better breakpoint management suggest he holds a competitive advantage.
Michael Zhu also benefits from more experience against higher-ranking opponents, and his steady performance on Hard courts aligns well with the match's setting. Additionally, he has shown a greater resilience in matches that stretch to deciding sets, further supporting his edge in potential high-stress scenarios.
Given these observations, Michael Zhu emerges as the probable favorite to secure victory in this upcoming encounter, leveraging his slight statistical advantages and broader competitive experience.
Daniil Sarksian vs Michael Zhu Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Sarksian vs M. Zhu H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 4 | Games Won | 12 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:24:55 | Average Match Time | 1:24:55 |
| 57% (34/60) | 1st Serve % | 60% (38/63) |
| 59% (20/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (29/38) |
| 42% (11/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (11/25) |
| 0% (0/7) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (4/14) |
| 37% (23/63) | Return Points Win % | 48% (29/60) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Sarksian Recent Matches Played
M. Zhu Recent Matches Played

D. Sarksian vs M. Zhu Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 41.07% (23/33) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.96% (265/255) |
| 41.98% (55/76) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.47% (595/584) |
| 46.44% (593/684) | Games Win/Loss | 50.30% (5419/5355) |
| 38.10% (16/26) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.91% (204/189) |
| 50.00% (6/6) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.51% (49/52) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 46.15% (12/14) |
| 0.19 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 121 | Aces Total | 415 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 178 | Total Double Faults | 804 |
| 1:23:11 | Average Match Time | 1:6:41 |
| 461.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 393.5 |
| 57% (1808/3145) | 1st Serve % | 66% (15128/22795) |
| 65% (1182/1808) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (9167/15128) |
| 45% (601/1337) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3659/7666) |
| 42% (119/286) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (965/2140) |
| 39% (1215/3103) | Return Points Win % | 40% (8893/22140) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 23.08% (3/10) |
| 41.82% (23/32) | Futures W/L | 51.68% (262/245) |
| 40% (22/55) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (261/512) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 55% (11/20) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (47/81) |
| 50% (10/20) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (75/143) |
| 86% (21/18) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (267/224) |
| 14% (21/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (267/42) |
| 14% (35/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (253/39) |