Daniil Glinka vs Jangjun Kim Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In the last six months, Daniil Glinka has secured 46.46% of points on his second serve, slightly surpassing Jangjun Kim's 45.86%. Could this give Glinka an edge?
• When it comes to returning second serve points, Kim leads, winning 46.24% compared to Glinka’s 42.86%. Does this indicate Kim's strength in return games?
• The first serve return stats show Kim with a higher performance rate of 28.47% over Glinka’s 24.47%. How might this influence the match's outcome?
• Under pressure, Kim has saved 54.02% of breakpoints, marginally outperforming Glinka who has saved 51.82%. Could this resilience be crucial?
• During the past year, Glinka has won 70.89% of his matches, significantly better than Kim’s 50.00%. Does this hint at Glinka’s current superiority?
• Both players have their best career win rates on indoor hard courts at 60%. However, Kim's performance notably drops on hard surfaces with a win rate of 33%, unlike Glinka, who only slightly dips on clay.
• Competing mainly in Challengers/ITF events, Glinka wins 68.18% of his matches, contrasted with Kim’s 33.33% in Futures/Satellites. Could playing at a higher level benefit Glinka?
• Glinka faced opponents ranked on average 431.38, whereas Kim's opponents were ranked 351.08. Does playing against tougher competition give Kim an edge?
• In deciding sets over the last year, Glinka has emerged victorious 54% of the time, just ahead of Kim's 50%. How might this affect close matches?
• Glinka converts 26.32% of breakpoints in recent play, slightly outperforming Kim’s 25.40%. Could this be a decisive factor?

Editorial Prediction (November 13, 2025, UTC):

Both Daniil Glinka and Jangjun Kim show strong second serve performances, but Kim has the advantage in returning both first and second serves. This may be key in breaking Glinka's serve.

Glinka’s experience in higher-level tournaments and overall win rate over the past year could provide a significant edge. Although Kim saves slightly more breakpoints, Glinka’s ability to win crucial deciding sets suggests strong mental fortitude in high-pressure situations.

While Kim has faced opponents with higher average rankings, Glinka's consistent performance and slightly better breakpoint conversion rate indicate a possible advantage.

Based on these facts, Daniil Glinka is likely to win the upcoming match, leveraging his extensive match experience and consistent results over the past year.