Daniil Glinka vs Cannon Kingsley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Nov at 03:33 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Glinka vs C. Kingsley

EST
2
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Glinka 2 - 0 Kingsley
They have played 5 sets in total, with Daniil Glinka winning 4 and Cannon Kingsley winning 1. The last match between Daniil Glinka and Cannon Kingsley was at the Drummondville Challenger, 12-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Daniil Glinka getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Glinka | 2 |
| Kingsley | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Drummondville Challenger(11-12-25)
(Q1) Oeiras 1 Challenger(12-31-23)
D. Glinka vs C. Kingsley H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 56.01% (233-183) | Career Total W/L | 57.77% (145-106) |
| 2 | Indoor | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Glinka vs C. Kingsley Match Preview:
- When evaluating recent performance, Cannon Kingsley holds a slight edge in second serve points won at 47.22%, compared to Daniil Glinka's 46.20%.
- Regarding return game performance, Kingsley also narrowly leads by winning 43.86% of opponents' second serve points, edging out Glinka's 42.93%.
- In first serve return stats, Glinka has a slight advantage, winning 24.57% against Kingsley's 23.98%.
- Who handles breakpoints better? Glinka shows a marginally higher capability, saving 51.06% of breakpoints compared to Kingsley's 50.55%.
- Over the last year, Glinka has showcased a stronger overall match performance with 70.51% wins, considerably better than Kingsley's 54.00%.
- Considering playing surfaces, Glinka excels on Indoor hard courts with a 60% win rate, whereas Kingsley excels on Clay with the same percentage.
- Both players have mainly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, but Glinka's win rate of 67.44% surpasses Kingsley's 55.56%.
- In their head-to-head confrontation, Glinka leads 1-0, having won their previous and only encounter.
- Average opponent quality is close, with Glinka facing players ranked on average at 429.59 and Kingsley at 420.98.
- In deciding sets, Glinka again leads, winning 54% compared to Kingsley's 47% over the past year.
Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):
As we analyze both players' recent performances and historical data, several factors emerge that will influence this upcoming encounter. Cannon Kingsley exhibits a slight edge in recent second-serve points and returning game stats, hinting at resilient baseline play.
Daniil Glinka, however, compensates with stronger pressure performance, notably in breakpoint scenarios, and exhibits a more consistent overall form throughout the year, as evident in his superior win percentages and head-to-head advantage.
Combining these insights, Daniil Glinka's previous victory over Cannon Kingsley and his superior record in deciding sets suggest that he is slightly more likely to clinch the win in this matchup.
Daniil Glinka vs Cannon Kingsley Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Glinka vs C. Kingsley H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 27 | Games Won | 20 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:53:11 | Average Match Time | 1:53:11 |
| 49% (79/160) | 1st Serve % | 59% (93/157) |
| 76% (60/79) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (60/93) |
| 44% (36/81) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (28/64) |
| 47% (9/19) | Break Pts Won % | 26% (5/19) |
| 44% (69/157) | Return Points Win % | 40% (64/160) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Glinka Recent Matches Played
C. Kingsley Recent Matches Played

D. Glinka vs C. Kingsley Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.01% (233/183) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.77% (145/106) |
| 55.87% (533/421) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.42% (325/251) |
| 52.64% (4868/4379) | Games Win/Loss | 53.64% (2939/2540) |
| 53.66% (110/95) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.46% (61/51) |
| 47.27% (26/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.82% (34/21) |
| 62.18% (97/59) | Indoor Hard W/L | 59.52% (50/34) |
| 0.43 | Aces Per Game | 0.54 |
| 1946 | Aces Total | 1443 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 960 | Total Double Faults | 456 |
| 1:23:4 | Average Match Time | 1:32:23 |
| 425.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 427.35 |
| 61% (14417/23720) | 1st Serve % | 62% (9688/15602) |
| 72% (10328/14417) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (6964/9688) |
| 52% (4867/9303) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (3065/5913) |
| 41% (917/2220) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (604/1483) |
| 38% (9289/24142) | Return Points Win % | 39% (6089/15664) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 100.00% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 54.17% (52/44) | Challenger W/L | 49.49% (49/50) |
| 56.43% (180/139) | Futures W/L | 64.43% (96/53) |
| 56% (230/412) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (143/248) |
| 47% (63/134) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (32/72) |
| 44% (56/126) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (40/77) |
| 82% (248/203) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (142/124) |
| 18% (248/45) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (142/18) |
| 17% (168/29) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (109/21) |