Daniele Rapagnetta vs Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Analyzing the second serve performance over the past six months provides a close comparison between the two players. Rapagnetta has been slightly more effective, winning 45.76% of points on their second serve, compared to Makhlouf's 44.37%. This subtle edge in second serve efficiency can be pivotal when making judicious match predictions. Additionally, return stats accentuate Rapagnetta's prowess, with a 48.41% success rate on winning their opponent's second serve points contrasted with Makhlouf's 43.5%. For first serve returns, Rapagnetta maintains a slim lead at 31.46% over Makhlouf's 30.33%, lending a marginal advantage to the overall prediction calculus.

Evaluating performance under pressure, both players showcase comparable abilities. Rapagnetta has managed to save 54.2% of breakpoints, closely pursued by Makhlouf at 54.35%. This narrow difference may not significantly influence the outcome in isolation but is beneficial for in-game betting strategies. Performance appraisal over the past year shows Makhlouf with a higher winning percentage of 56.41% compared to Rapagnetta's 52.63%. These figures encompass a broader scope of their competitive history and assist in forecasting the likely winner in head-to-head confrontations.

Surface-specific career achievements highlight that both players demonstrate a preference for hard courts. Rapagnetta boasts a win rate of 62% on this surface, while Makhlouf trails slightly at 58%. On clay, both players underperform, with Rapagnetta holding a 46% win rate and Makhlouf clocking in at 40%. Accounting for the level of play, Rapagnetta has been competing in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, winning 54.05% of matches, whereas Makhlouf has participated in the same tier with a 56.41% success rate.

A closer look at opponent quality reveals that over the last 12 months, Makhlouf has faced relatively higher-ranked competitors, with an average ranking of 264.73 against Rapagnetta's 328.37. This could imply Makhlouf's experience against more challenging opposition. In deciding sets, Rapagnetta shines with a commanding win rate of 60% while Makhlouf trails at 41%, signaling a potential edge for Rapagnetta in tightly contested matches. Furthermore, when considering break point conversion, Rapagnetta again holds a slight advantage by converting 38.89% of opportunities compared to Makhlouf's 35.56%.

Considering these detailed metrics, Rapagnetta appears to possess a modest edge in multiple key performance indicators, making them the plausibly favored player to emerge victorious in the forthcoming tennis match.