Prediction of Daniele Bracciali vs Justin Gimelstob Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
D. Bracciali vs J. Gimelstob

Daniele Bracciali

ITA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'10" (178 cm)

Height

6'5" (196 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$290.9K

Career Money

$197.9K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Justin Gimelstob

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

5'10" (178 cm)

Height

6'5" (196 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$290.9K

Career Money

$197.9K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Bracciali 1 - 0 Gimelstob

They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniele Bracciali winning 2 and Justin Gimelstob winning 0. The last match between Daniele Bracciali and Justin Gimelstob was at the Pacific Life Open - Indian Wells, 09-03-2007, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Daniele Bracciali getting the victory 6-2 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Bracciali	1
Gimelstob	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Pacific Life Open - Indian Wells(03-09-07)

Stats

Daniele Bracciali

Justin Gimelstob

D. Bracciali vs J. Gimelstob H2H Profile

D. Bracciali	Stats	J. Gimelstob
$290,890	Career Prize Money	$197,880
51.19% (237-226)	Career Total W/L	51.94% (295-273)
1	Hard	0
7	Titles	7
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

D. Bracciali vs J. Gimelstob Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daniele Bracciali has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Justin Gimelstob has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daniele Bracciali, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Justin Gimelstob has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Daniele Bracciali has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Justin Gimelstob has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Daniele Bracciali has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Justin Gimelstob winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Daniele Bracciali has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 64% (W/L 41/23), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 13/21). Justin Gimelstob has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 57/41), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 32% (W/L 14/30).
Player level: In the last year, Daniele Bracciali has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Justin Gimelstob has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Daniele Bracciali winning 1 times and Justin Gimelstob being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniele Bracciali winning 2 and Justin Gimelstob winning 0.
The last match between Daniele Bracciali and Justin Gimelstob was at the Pacific Life Open - Indian Wells, 09-03-2007, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Daniele Bracciali getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daniele Bracciali has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Justin Gimelstob has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daniele Bracciali has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Justin Gimelstob has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Daniele Bracciali has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Justin Gimelstob has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Daniele Bracciali vs Justin Gimelstob Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

D. Bracciali vs J. Gimelstob H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

D. Bracciali	Stats	J. Gimelstob
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	3
4	Aces (Total)	3
2	Total Double Faults	5
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
49% (25/51)	1st Serve %	40% (20/50)
68% (17/25)	1st Serve Win %	55% (11/20)
62% (16/26)	2nd Serve Win %	40% (12/30)
50% (5/10)	Break Pts Won %	0% (0/1)
54% (27/50)	Return Points Win %	35% (18/51)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

D. Bracciali Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Barranquilla Challenger - 24-03-2014
Q1 Leonardo Civita-TellesL. Civita-Telles	L	6-2 3-6 7-5	Stats
Copa Claro - Buenos Aires - 10-02-2014
Q1 Juan Ignacio LonderoJ. Ignacio	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Davis Cup, World Group, PO, CHI-ITA 1-4 - 12-09-2011
Rubber 5 Nicolas MassuN. Massu	W	4-3 ret.	Stats
Caltanissetta Challenger - 21-03-2011
R1 Pablo Carreno-BustaP. Carreno-Busta	L	6-0 7-5	Stats
Ortisei Challenger - 08-11-2010
R1 Ivan SergeyevI. Sergeyev	L	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

J. Gimelstob Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
St. Petersburg Open - St. Petersburg - 22-10-2007
R1 Mikhail YouzhnyM. Youzhny	L	6-2 6-4	Stats
ATP Kremlin Cup - Moscow - 08-10-2007
R1 Philipp KohlschreiberP. Kohlschreiber	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
AIG Japan Open Tennis Championships - Tokyo - 01-10-2007
R2 Thomas JohanssonT. Johansson	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Lukasz KubotL. Kubot	W	6-4 7-5	Stats
U.S. Open - New York - 27-08-2007
R1 Andy RoddickA. Roddick	L	7-6(6) 6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

D. Bracciali vs J. Gimelstob Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

D. Bracciali	Stats	J. Gimelstob
51.19% (237/226)	YTD Win/Loss	51.94% (295/273)
50.27% (558/552)	Sets Win/Loss	51.86% (725/673)
49.87% (5323/5350)	Games Win/Loss	50.70% (6839/6649)
57.50% (69/51)	Hard Win/Loss	53.80% (177/152)
45.78% (76/90)	Clay Win/Loss	31.82% (14/30)
45.13% (51/62)	Indoor Hard W/L	57.02% (65/49)
64.06% (41/23)	Grass Win/Loss	48.15% (39/42)
0.09	Aces Per Game	0.07
475	Aces Total	475
0.05	Double Faults Per Game	0.04
235	Total Double Faults	234
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
516.21	Average Opponent Rank	453.55
54% (3425/6324)	1st Serve %	56% (2771/4933)
71% (2410/3402)	1st Serve Win %	72% (2015/2783)
50% (1443/2880)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (1018/2160)
36% (167/464)	Break Points Won % (Total)	38% (126/336)
34% (2072/6059)	Return Points Win %	34% (1517/4473)
55.56% (25/20)	Slam W/L	44.62% (29/36)
36.00% (9/16)	Masters W/L	45.83% (22/26)
33.33% (2/4)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/1)
41.67% (30/42)	Main Tour W/L	43.23% (99/130)
52.94% (153/136)	Challenger W/L	64.44% (145/80)
69.23% (18/8)	Futures W/L	0% (0/0)
52% (222/428)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (273/506)
38% (10/26)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	35% (20/57)
54% (95/175)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	47% (100/215)
53% (79/149)	Deciding Set Win %	47% (89/189)
81% (226/183)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (304/248)
19% (226/43)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (304/54)
22% (237/53)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (263/47)