Daniel Uta vs Antoni Fabre Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 18 Nov at 08:28 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

D. Uta vs A. Fabre

Daniel Uta
Daniel Uta

Flag ROU ROU

l
w
w
w
l
w
l
w
w
w
Antoni Fabre
Antoni Fabre

Flag FRA FRA

w
w
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

19
Age
21
-
Height
-
0
C. Rank
0
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Uta 1 - 0 Fabre

They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniel Uta winning 2 and Antoni Fabre winning 0. The last match between Daniel Uta and Antoni Fabre was at the M25 Antalya, 18-11-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Daniel Uta getting the victory 6-3 7-6(2).

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Uta1
Fabre0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q3M25 Antalya(11-18-25)

Clay
ROU Flag
Daniel Uta
6
7
FRA Flag
Antoni Fabre
3
6

D. Uta vs A. Fabre H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
45.88% (39-46)Career Total W/L56.79% (46-35)
1Clay0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

D. Uta vs A. Fabre Match Preview:

  • Second Serve Efficiency: Daniel Uta has recently shown stronger second serve performance, winning 40.00% of points compared to Antoni Fabre's 34.65%. Could this give Uta an edge? The data suggests so.
  • Return Game: Antoni Fabre excels in winning points off opponents' second serves, achieving 51.02% compared to Uta's 43.49%. Could this be a decisive factor in the match? It might be.
  • Under Pressure: Under pressure, Daniel Uta has saved 50.71% of breakpoints compared to Antoni Fabre's 43.43%, indicating better composure during critical moments.
  • Performance in the Last Year: Antoni Fabre has been more successful over the past year with a higher win percentage (68.18%) than Daniel Uta (54.72%).
  • Preferred Surface: Both players favor clay, boasting identical win percentages of 46%, yet Antoni Fabre performs better on hard surfaces with a 54% win rate.
  • Match Level: Antoni Fabre plays at a slightly higher level, competing against tougher opponents with an average rank of 165.91, while Uta's opponent average rank is 194.92.
  • Deciding Sets: Antoni Fabre has proven stronger in deciding sets, winning 50% compared to Uta's 44% over the last year. Could endurance be key? It’s likely.
  • Breakpoint Conversion: Both players show similar breakpoint conversion rates, with Uta converting 42.86% and Fabre 41.18%, making them closely matched in seizing chances to break serve.

Editorial Prediction (November 18, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the players' recent performances, it is apparent that Antoni Fabre holds several advantages that could sway the upcoming tennis match in his favor. His excellent return game performance and higher win percentage over the past year indicate greater consistency and the ability to challenge opponents effectively.

While Daniel Uta demonstrates improved performance under pressure, Antoni’s edge in playing against tougher opponents and his superior hard-court performance suggest a level of play that may outmatch Uta. Furthermore, Fabre's slight edge in deciding set performance supports his ability to maintain competitive play throughout the match.

Considering these factors, Antoni Fabre appears to be the more likely victor in the upcoming match, leveraging his return game strength and overall success rate to secure a win.

Daniel Uta vs Antoni Fabre Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

D. Uta vs A. Fabre H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
13Games Won9
1Aces (Total)0
1Total Double Faults1
1:38:16Average Match Time1:38:16
66% (43/65)1st Serve %55% (34/62)
67% (29/43)1st Serve Win %53% (18/34)
50% (11/22)2nd Serve Win %50% (14/28)
44% (4/9)Break Pts Won %60% (3/5)
48% (30/62)Return Points Win %38% (25/65)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Uta 42%, Fabre 41%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Uta 45%, Fabre 57%.
Break Points Saved %: Uta 50%, Fabre 51%.

D. Uta Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayM25 Antalya - 17-11-2025

Q3

FRAA. Fabre
W
6-3 7-6(2)

Q2

AUTL. Rohseano
W
6-7(4) 6-0 10-6

Q1

SRBN. Lulic
W
3-6 6-2 11-9
ClayM15 Antalya - 10-11-2025

Q2

ESPL. Garcia
L
7-6(5) 3-6 11-9

Q1

SLOM. Mikovic
W
6-3 6-3

A. Fabre Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayM25 Antalya - 17-11-2025

Q3

ROUD. Uta
L
6-3 7-6(2)

Q2

ROUM. Varbanciu
W
6-1 6-3

Q1

RUSA. Figurovskiy
W
6-0 6-3
ClayM15 Antalya - 10-11-2025

R1

ROUS. Adrian
L
6-3 6-0

Q3

SWEO. Andersson
W
6-0 6-0
banner

D. Uta vs A. Fabre Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
45.88% (39/46)YTD Win/Loss56.79% (46/35)
46.56% (88/101)Sets Win/Loss56.35% (102/79)
49.13% (850/880)Games Win/Loss55.56% (935/748)
0.00% (0/1)Hard Win/Loss53.85% (7/6)
46.99% (39/44)Clay Win/Loss57.35% (39/29)
0.00% (0/1)Indoor Hard W/L0% (0/0)
0.06Aces Per Game0.04
53Aces Total33
0.12Double Faults Per Game0.09
101Total Double Faults76
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
174.74Average Opponent Rank194
61% (1295/2115)1st Serve %67% (1517/2275)
57% (735/1295)1st Serve Win %58% (875/1517)
41% (334/820)2nd Serve Win %43% (327/758)
46% (83/180)Break Points Won % (Total)47% (137/290)
38% (759/1973)Return Points Win %46% (1042/2273)
25.00% (2/6)Challenger W/L0% (0/0)
48.05% (37/40)Futures W/L56.79% (46/35)
45% (38/84)Best of 3 Sets Win %56% (44/79)
0% (0/0)Best of 5 Sets Win %100% (1/1)
47% (7/15)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)20% (3/15)
40% (8/20)Deciding Set Win %42% (8/19)
89% (36/32)1st Set Won, Won Match93% (42/39)
11% (36/4)1st Set Won, Lost Match7% (42/3)
12% (49/6)1st Set Lost, Won Match18% (39/7)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

04:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
BRAG. Heide
BRAL. S. FrancaWC
W1
1.003
W2
11
12:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
ESPA. S. RoigWC
BIHA. NedicALT
W1
2.1
W2
1.64
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
GERR. Molleker
ITAP. O. Fellin
W1
1.52
W2
2.33
12:30 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
CZEZ. Kolar7
ESPN. Sanchez-Izquierdo
W1
1.55
W2
2.26
02:00 AM 20/11/25
Prediction
AUSJ. Duckworth1
AUSM. Dellavedova
W1
1.056
W2
7.1
12:30 PM 20/11/25
Prediction
ROUC. Cretuq
ARGM. Trungelliti2
W1
2.46
W2
1.47