Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Smethurst vs Sebastian Fanselow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smethurst vs Fanselow analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Smethurst vs Sebastian Fanselow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smethurst has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Fanselow has won 50.14%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smethurst, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fanselow has won 50.47%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 29.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smethurst has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fanselow has saved 58.02% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smethurst has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Fanselow winning 61.63% (W/L 53/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smethurst has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 105/ 55), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 15/ 31). Fanselow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 204/ 118), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 33/ 30).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Smethurst winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Smethurst winning 2 and Fanselow winning 1. The last match between Smethurst and Fanselow was at the USA F2, 15-01-2016, Quarterfinals, Hard with Daniel Smethurst getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Smethurst and Fanselow have played a deciding set 1 times, with Smethurst winning 1 times and Fanselow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Smethurst winning 0, and Fanselow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smethurst has played against opponents with an average rank of while Fanselow has played against players with an average rank of 228.84.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smethurst has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fanselow has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smethurst has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fanselow has converted 34.3% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Smethurst 1 - 0 Fanselow
Ret.
Rank
234
High
33
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
298
Rank
273
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
60% (299-199)
Career Total W/L
61% (353-230)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
52% (16-15)
$3,660
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Smethurst | Sebastian Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:12:0 | 2:12:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (58/82) | 61% (54/89) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (46/58) | 74% (40/54) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (11/24) | 46% (16/35) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (3/10) | 14% (1/7) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (33/89) | 30% (25/82) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
4
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
40 of
54)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
30%
(
25 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Smethurst | Sebastian Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 52% (16/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (34/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (346/351) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 62% (8/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.41 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 141 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.27 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 91 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:48:56 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 225.39 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (1259/2163) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (894/1259) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (457/904) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 35% (76/219) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (845/2247) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (10/12) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (15/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 43% (6/14) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 93% (14/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 7% (14/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 18% (17/3) |
Daniel Smethurst Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Daniel Smethurst
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
76%
(
78 of
102)
24
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
57 of
78)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Joe Salisbury
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Ross Watson
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Adrien Bossel
Player
Daniel Smethurst
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Winston Lin
Player
Daniel Smethurst
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
46%
(
37 of
81)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
12 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Keith-Patrick Crowley
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
15
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Daniel Smethurst
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Winston Lin
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Daniel Smethurst
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
7
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
2
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
109)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(1) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Luca Castagnola
43%
(
41 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
15
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jakub Nicod
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
12
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Martyn Pawelski
65%
(
67 of
103)
1st Serve %
64%
(
79 of
124)
11
Aces
15
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
59 of
79)
58%
(
21 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
124)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
6-7(4) 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Aleksandr Braynin
56%
(
57 of
101)
1st Serve %
71%
(
85 of
119)
9
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
8
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
54 of
85)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
33 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
48 of
119)
116
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
David Poljak
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Smethurst Vs Fanselow Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
