Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Smethurst vs Scott Clayton Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Smethurst vs Clayton analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Smethurst vs Scott Clayton Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Smethurst has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Clayton has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Smethurst, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Clayton has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Smethurst has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Clayton has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Smethurst has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Clayton winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Smethurst has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 66% (W/L 105/ 55), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 15/ 31). Clayton has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 89/ 67), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 15% (W/L 2/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Smethurst winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Smethurst winning 4 and Clayton winning 0. The last match between Smethurst and Clayton was at the Great Britain F8, 31-08-2015, Second, Hard with Daniel Smethurst getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Smethurst and Clayton have played a deciding set 0 times, with Smethurst winning 0 times and Clayton 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Smethurst winning 0, and Clayton 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Smethurst has played against opponents with an average rank of while Clayton has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Smethurst has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Clayton has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Smethurst has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Clayton has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Smethurst 2 - 0 Clayton
Ret.
Rank
234
High
33
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
689
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
60% (299-199)
Career Total W/L
53% (136-120)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,660
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Smethurst | Scott Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-1 | |||||
| 7-5 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Smethurst | Scott Clayton |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Smethurst Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats 
Marius Copil
Player
Daniel Smethurst
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
76%
(
78 of
102)
24
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
57 of
78)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
30 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
34 of
102)
105
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Joe Salisbury
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
7
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
44 of
55)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
38%
(
31 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Ross Watson
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
40 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Adrien Bossel
Player
Daniel Smethurst
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
35 of
49)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
27 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Winston Lin
Player
Daniel Smethurst
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve %
46%
(
37 of
81)
1
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
12 of
44)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
42 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Keith-Patrick Crowley
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
15
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Daniel Smethurst
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Smethurst
Player
Winston Lin
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
7
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
2
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Daniel Smethurst
62%
(
64 of
103)
1st Serve %
54%
(
59 of
109)
7
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
2
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
33 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
41 of
109)
111
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(1) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Scott Clayton Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Federico Zeballos
Player
Scott Clayton
51%
(
28 of
55)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
78%
(
21 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
12 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thomas Brechemier
Player
Scott Clayton
37%
(
22 of
59)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
17 of
22)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
73%
(
27 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 3-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marko Osmakcic
Player
Scott Clayton
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
8
Aces
6
14
Double Faults
3
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
42%
(
20 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
97
|
0-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ioannis Stergiou
Player
Scott Clayton
62%
(
56 of
91)
1st Serve %
52%
(
55 of
105)
0
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
42 of
105)
97
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Scott Duncan
Player
Scott Clayton
75%
(
107 of
143)
1st Serve %
62%
(
71 of
114)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
8
58%
(
62 of
107)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
47 of
71)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
45%
(
64 of
143)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
51 of
114)
130
Total Points Won
127
|
6-3 6-7(1) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicholas S. Hu
Player
Scott Clayton
65%
(
64 of
98)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
43 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
34 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(4) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Scott Clayton
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ramkumar Ramanathan
Player
Scott Clayton
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Smethurst Vs Clayton Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
