Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Nolan vs Calum Puttergill Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nolan vs Puttergill analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Nolan vs Calum Puttergill Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nolan has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Puttergill has won 48%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nolan, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Puttergill has won 54.79%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 33.8% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nolan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Puttergill has saved 52.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nolan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Puttergill winning 37.04% (W/L 10/ 17) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nolan has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 64/ 60), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 32% (W/L 9/ 19). Puttergill has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 38/ 33), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Nolan winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Nolan winning 4 and Puttergill winning 3. The last match between Nolan and Puttergill was at the Singapore F3 (Singapore), 28-05-2018, First, Hard with Daniel Nolan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:22:2.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nolan and Puttergill have played a deciding set 2 times, with Nolan winning 2 times and Puttergill 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Nolan winning 0, and Puttergill 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nolan has played against opponents with an average rank of while Puttergill has played against players with an average rank of 187.52.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nolan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Puttergill has won 30% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nolan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Puttergill has converted 48.48% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nolan 2 - 1 Puttergill
Ret.
Rank
606
High
27
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard1
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
880
Rank
663
High
30
Age
R
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
47% (74-82)
Career Total W/L
50% (170-172)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (3-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nolan VS Puttergill H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Daniel Nolan | Calum Puttergill |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
| Games Won | 37 | 31 |
| Aces (Total) | 7 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 15 | 17 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:22:2 | 2:22:2 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (148/243) | 63% (141/224) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (96/148) | 55% (77/141) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (41/95) | 43% (36/83) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 59% (16/27) | 54% (13/24) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (111/224) | 44% (106/243) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Nolan VS Puttergill H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Daniel Nolan
Player
Calum Puttergill
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
11
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
| 3-2 ret. |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Daniel Nolan
64%
(
7 of
11)
1st Serve %
42%
(
8 of
19)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
4 of
7)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
16
Total Points Won
14
|
||||
| 7-5 6-7(5) 7-5 |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Calum Puttergill
57%
(
88 of
154)
1st Serve %
67%
(
87 of
129)
4
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
6
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
44%
(
29 of
66)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
44%
(
68 of
154)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
62 of
129)
148
Total Points Won
135
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Nolan | Calum Puttergill |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (9/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (71/69) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.43 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 29 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 18 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:48:52 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 172.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (282/442) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 65% (184/282) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (77/160) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 57% (23/40) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (198/458) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/4) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Daniel Nolan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Michael Look
Player
Daniel Nolan
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
35 of
66)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Nitin Kumar Sinha
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
0
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Mohit Mayur Jayaprakash
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
27 of
46)
2
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
7
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Soichiro Moritani
57%
(
36 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
39 of
70)
3
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
3
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
70)
71
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Look
Player
Daniel Nolan
58%
(
18 of
31)
1st Serve %
55%
(
16 of
29)
8
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
7 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
37
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maverick Banes
Player
Daniel Nolan
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve %
80%
(
32 of
40)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
6 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
50
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Alec Adamson
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
15 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Blake Ellis
65%
(
81 of
125)
1st Serve %
54%
(
45 of
83)
1
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
2
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
31 of
45)
36%
(
16 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
44%
(
55 of
125)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
83)
103
Total Points Won
105
|
6-3 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Nolan
Player
Calum Puttergill
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
47 of
84)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
11
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Takuto Niki
Player
Daniel Nolan
58%
(
59 of
101)
1st Serve %
65%
(
63 of
97)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
41 of
63)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
43%
(
43 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
38 of
97)
96
Total Points Won
102
|
1-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Calum Puttergill Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Andre Ilagan
Player
Calum Puttergill
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Moerani Bouzige
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kokoro Isomura
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Harper
Player
Calum Puttergill
66%
(
67 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
3
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
7
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
104
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hiroki Moriya
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
54 of
87)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
38 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
101
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Preston Brown
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Calum Puttergill
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
8
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
44 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
63
|
4-6 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Calum Puttergill
Player
Kazuki Nishiwaki
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
2
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ajeet Rai
Player
Calum Puttergill
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
12
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
7
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
46%
(
16 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-1 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pavle Marinkov
Player
Calum Puttergill
52%
(
51 of
98)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
7
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
40 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Nolan Vs Puttergill Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
