Daniel Milavsky vs Aristotelis Thanos Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Nov at 11:00 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Milavsky vs A. Thanos

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GRE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Milavsky 1 - 0 Thanos
They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniel Milavsky winning 2 and Aristotelis Thanos winning 0. The last match between Daniel Milavsky and Aristotelis Thanos was at the Drummondville Challenger, 12-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Daniel Milavsky getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Milavsky | 1 |
| Thanos | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Drummondville Challenger(11-12-25)
D. Milavsky vs A. Thanos H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 67.37% (64-31) | Career Total W/L | 62.78% (140-83) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 100.00% (1-0) |
D. Milavsky vs A. Thanos Match Preview:
- In terms of second serve performance, Daniel Milavsky seems to have an advantage, winning 47.17% of points compared to Aristotelis Thanos' 40.85% over the past six months. What impact does this have on their match prediction? This suggests a stronger serve consistency for Milavsky.
- Regarding return game effectiveness, Thanos has an edge, capturing 49.03% of second serve return points against his opponents, whereas Milavsky has secured 43.52%. For first serve returns, Thanos again leads with 28.39% compared to Milavsky's 24.71%. Does this suggest Thanos might outperform on returns? Indeed, he appears more aggressive in breaking serves.
- Under pressure, Milavsky has a slight upper hand, saving 55.22% of breakpoints, which exceeds Thanos' 47.14%. Could this indicate better resilience? It indeed suggests that Milavsky performs better under high-pressure scenarios.
- Performance over the last year shows Milavsky's superior match success, with a 70.42% win rate compared to Thanos' 65.96%. Might this reflect greater overall consistency? Yes, Milavsky holds a slight advantage here as well.
- Evaluating career surfaces, Thanos excels on Clay with a 68% win rate, while his record on Hard courts is lower at 58%. Conversely, Milavsky is most successful on Indoor Hard courts, where he has a 68% win rate, but falters on Grass.
- Both players have played primarily on the Futures/Satellites/ITF circuits, with Milavsky maintaining a slightly better win rate of 78.43% against Thanos' 77.78% at the $10K tournament level.
- Opponent strength over the past 12 months is similar, with Thanos facing opponents of an average rank of 419.98, closely matching Milavsky's average opponent rank of 416.23.
- In deciding sets, Thanos shows a marginal preference, winning 64% compared to Milavsky's 63%. Could this suggest a competitive edge in crucial moments? It indicates Thanos might have a slight psychological advantage.
Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent form and historical performance, Daniel Milavsky demonstrates superior second serve points consistency, which is a vital component for maintaining service games. This statistic is often predictive of match outcomes.
Despite Milavsky’s stronger performance under pressure and his overall higher match win percentage in the past year, Aristotelis Thanos shows greater effectiveness in the return game, particularly against second serves. Thanos' ability to convert return chances could prove crucial.
Both players are closely matched in their record against opponents of similar strength, implying an evenly poised contest. However, Milavsky’s strength on crucial breakpoints, combined with his slight historical edge, suggests a very slight favoritism.
Given these observations and factoring in Milavsky's better breakpoint saving ability, he is marginally more likely to win the upcoming match. Yet, Thanos' prowess in return games means he can't be underestimated, especially if the match becomes a grind into long rallies.
Daniel Milavsky vs Aristotelis Thanos Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Milavsky vs A. Thanos H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 5 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:33:32 | Average Match Time | 1:33:32 |
| 57% (46/80) | 1st Serve % | 55% (30/55) |
| 61% (28/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (20/30) |
| 53% (18/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (8/25) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (3/7) |
| 49% (27/55) | Return Points Win % | 43% (34/80) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Milavsky Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 3-6 7-6(6) | ||
R1 | W | 6-0 3-6 6-1 | ||
F | W | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | ||
A. Thanos Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||

D. Milavsky vs A. Thanos Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 67.37% (64/31) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.78% (140/83) |
| 63.11% (142/83) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.56% (301/196) |
| 55.25% (1190/964) | Games Win/Loss | 55.24% (2556/2071) |
| 66.13% (41/21) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.04% (65/47) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 68.42% (65/30) |
| 76.92% (20/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.50% (10/6) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 440 | Aces Total | 478 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 294 | Total Double Faults | 682 |
| 1:32:24 | Average Match Time | 1:13:4 |
| 369.62 | Average Opponent Rank | 356.47 |
| 61% (3431/5663) | 1st Serve % | 59% (5934/9988) |
| 72% (2467/3431) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3998/5934) |
| 52% (1153/2232) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1855/4054) |
| 41% (244/591) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (523/1079) |
| 40% (2298/5712) | Return Points Win % | 43% (4238/9833) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 50.00% (11/11) | Challenger W/L | 45.00% (9/11) |
| 72.60% (53/20) | Futures W/L | 64.47% (127/70) |
| 66% (61/92) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (137/216) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 39% (11/28) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (27/48) |
| 56% (20/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (32/52) |
| 89% (61/54) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (129/119) |
| 10% (61/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (129/10) |
| 26% (34/9) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (94/22) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Milavsky (Temuco Challenger)
Thanos (Hersonissos 7 Challenger)
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Leolia Jeanjean vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
