Daniel Milavsky vs Aristotelis Thanos Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 12 Nov at 11:00 PM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

D. Milavsky vs A. Thanos

Daniel Milavsky
Daniel Milavsky

Flag USA USA

l
w
w
w
w
w
w
l
w
l
Aristotelis Thanos
Aristotelis Thanos

Flag GRE GRE

l
w
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

24
Age
24
-
Height
-
369
C. Rank
439
369
Best Rank
433
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Milavsky 1 - 0 Thanos

They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniel Milavsky winning 2 and Aristotelis Thanos winning 0. The last match between Daniel Milavsky and Aristotelis Thanos was at the Drummondville Challenger, 12-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Daniel Milavsky getting the victory 6-3 6-4.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Milavsky1
Thanos0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1Drummondville Challenger(11-12-25)

I.hard
USA Flag
Daniel Milavsky
6
6
GRE Flag
Aristotelis Thanos
3
4

D. Milavsky vs A. Thanos H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
67.37% (64-31)Career Total W/L62.78% (140-83)
1Indoor0
4Titles3
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss100.00% (1-0)

D. Milavsky vs A. Thanos Match Preview:

  • In terms of second serve performance, Daniel Milavsky seems to have an advantage, winning 47.17% of points compared to Aristotelis Thanos' 40.85% over the past six months. What impact does this have on their match prediction? This suggests a stronger serve consistency for Milavsky.
  • Regarding return game effectiveness, Thanos has an edge, capturing 49.03% of second serve return points against his opponents, whereas Milavsky has secured 43.52%. For first serve returns, Thanos again leads with 28.39% compared to Milavsky's 24.71%. Does this suggest Thanos might outperform on returns? Indeed, he appears more aggressive in breaking serves.
  • Under pressure, Milavsky has a slight upper hand, saving 55.22% of breakpoints, which exceeds Thanos' 47.14%. Could this indicate better resilience? It indeed suggests that Milavsky performs better under high-pressure scenarios.
  • Performance over the last year shows Milavsky's superior match success, with a 70.42% win rate compared to Thanos' 65.96%. Might this reflect greater overall consistency? Yes, Milavsky holds a slight advantage here as well.
  • Evaluating career surfaces, Thanos excels on Clay with a 68% win rate, while his record on Hard courts is lower at 58%. Conversely, Milavsky is most successful on Indoor Hard courts, where he has a 68% win rate, but falters on Grass.
  • Both players have played primarily on the Futures/Satellites/ITF circuits, with Milavsky maintaining a slightly better win rate of 78.43% against Thanos' 77.78% at the $10K tournament level.
  • Opponent strength over the past 12 months is similar, with Thanos facing opponents of an average rank of 419.98, closely matching Milavsky's average opponent rank of 416.23.
  • In deciding sets, Thanos shows a marginal preference, winning 64% compared to Milavsky's 63%. Could this suggest a competitive edge in crucial moments? It indicates Thanos might have a slight psychological advantage.

Editorial Prediction (November 12, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the recent form and historical performance, Daniel Milavsky demonstrates superior second serve points consistency, which is a vital component for maintaining service games. This statistic is often predictive of match outcomes.

Despite Milavsky’s stronger performance under pressure and his overall higher match win percentage in the past year, Aristotelis Thanos shows greater effectiveness in the return game, particularly against second serves. Thanos' ability to convert return chances could prove crucial.

Both players are closely matched in their record against opponents of similar strength, implying an evenly poised contest. However, Milavsky’s strength on crucial breakpoints, combined with his slight historical edge, suggests a very slight favoritism.

Given these observations and factoring in Milavsky's better breakpoint saving ability, he is marginally more likely to win the upcoming match. Yet, Thanos' prowess in return games means he can't be underestimated, especially if the match becomes a grind into long rallies.

Daniel Milavsky vs Aristotelis Thanos Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

D. Milavsky vs A. Thanos H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won7
4Aces (Total)5
2Total Double Faults5
1:33:32Average Match Time1:33:32
57% (46/80)1st Serve %55% (30/55)
61% (28/46)1st Serve Win %67% (20/30)
53% (18/34)2nd Serve Win %32% (8/25)
71% (5/7)Break Pts Won %43% (3/7)
49% (27/55)Return Points Win %43% (34/80)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Milavsky 52%, Thanos 45%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Milavsky 51%, Thanos 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Milavsky 64%, Thanos 58%.

D. Milavsky Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardDrummondville Challenger - 10-11-2025

R2

GBRC. Broom
L
2-6 6-4 6-2

R1

GREA. Thanos
W
6-3 6-4
I.hardM25 Montreal - 03-11-2025

R2

USAC. Kingsley
L
6-3 3-6 7-6(6)

R1

CZED. Poljak
W
6-0 3-6 6-1
I.hardM15 Trois-Rivieres - 27-10-2025

F

USAT. Dean
W
6-2 3-6 6-3

A. Thanos Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardDrummondville Challenger - 10-11-2025

R1

USAD. Milavsky
L
6-3 6-4
I.hardKnoxville Challenger - 03-11-2025

R1

COLN. Mejia
L
6-4 7-5
ClayCuritiba Challenger - 13-10-2025

R1

BRAD. Dutra
L
6-4 6-1

Q1

ROUS. Gima
W
6-2 6-3

Q3

BRAD. Dutra
W
6-3 6-4
banner

D. Milavsky vs A. Thanos Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
67.37% (64/31)YTD Win/Loss62.78% (140/83)
63.11% (142/83)Sets Win/Loss60.56% (301/196)
55.25% (1190/964)Games Win/Loss55.24% (2556/2071)
66.13% (41/21)Hard Win/Loss58.04% (65/47)
50.00% (3/3)Clay Win/Loss68.42% (65/30)
76.92% (20/6)Indoor Hard W/L62.50% (10/6)
0.00% (0/1)Grass Win/Loss0% (0/0)
0.42Aces Per Game0.21
440Aces Total478
0.28Double Faults Per Game0.3
294Total Double Faults682
1:32:24Average Match Time1:13:4
369.62Average Opponent Rank356.47
61% (3431/5663)1st Serve %59% (5934/9988)
72% (2467/3431)1st Serve Win %67% (3998/5934)
52% (1153/2232)2nd Serve Win %46% (1855/4054)
41% (244/591)Break Points Won % (Total)48% (523/1079)
40% (2298/5712)Return Points Win %43% (4238/9833)
0% (0/0)Cups W/L66.67% (4/2)
50.00% (11/11)Challenger W/L45.00% (9/11)
72.60% (53/20)Futures W/L64.47% (127/70)
66% (61/92)Best of 3 Sets Win %63% (137/216)
100% (1/1)Best of 5 Sets Win %100% (3/3)
39% (11/28)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)56% (27/48)
56% (20/36)Deciding Set Win %62% (32/52)
89% (61/54)1st Set Won, Won Match92% (129/119)
10% (61/6)1st Set Won, Lost Match8% (129/10)
26% (34/9)1st Set Lost, Won Match23% (94/22)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Sun, 23 Nov, 03:00 PM
Prediction
GREM. Kalovelonis
GRED. Azoides
W1
4.45
W2
1.159
Sun, 23 Nov, 01:15 PM
Prediction
ESPS. P. Contri
CZEJ. Forejtek
W1
3.56
W2
1.24
Sun, 23 Nov, 01:15 PM
Prediction
PORJ. Graca
ESPC. L. Montagud
W1
5.15
W2
1.121
Sun, 23 Nov, 05:30 PM
Prediction
CANA. Donski
GERL. Wessels
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
Sun, 23 Nov, 01:30 PM
Prediction
CANK. Stevenson
GBRB. Jones
W1
8.1
W2
1.038
Sun, 23 Nov, 05:30 PM
Prediction
SVKA. Martin
PORG. Valdoleiros
W1
1.067
W2
6.65

Potential H2H Matches This Week

Milavsky (Temuco Challenger)
Milavsky vs DiasCould play in The Quarterfinals
Milavsky vs GomezCould play in The Quarterfinals
Torrealba vs MilavskyCould play in The Second
Acosta vs MilavskyCould play in The Second
Thanos (Hersonissos 7 Challenger)
Thanos vs ValleCould play in The Quarterfinals
Thanos vs SakellaridisCould play in The Quarterfinals
Thanos vs MollekerCould play in The Second
Thanos vs FajtaCould play in The Second