Daniel Michalski vs Benjamin Hassan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Michalski vs Hassan analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Michalski vs Benjamin Hassan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Michalski has won 50.25% of points on his second serve, while Hassan has won 50.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Michalski, in recent form, has won 52.9% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hassan has won 51.16%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.73% and 29.74% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Michalski has saved 56.88% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hassan has saved 60.41% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Michalski has won 58.06% of matches played (W/L 36/ 26), with Hassan winning 58.43% (W/L 52/ 37) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 179/ 92), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6). Hassan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 174/ 103), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.42% of matches (W/L 14/ 19), where as Hassan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60.87% of matches (W/L 42/ 27). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Michalski has played against opponents with an average rank of 237.11 while Hassan has played against players with an average rank of 265.65.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Michalski has won 42% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hassan has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Michalski has converted 44.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hassan has converted 42.31% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Michalski 0 - 0 Hassan
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
0% (0-0)
Career Total W/L
0% (0-0)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniel Michalski | Benjamin Hassan |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (11/14) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (27/31) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (280/277) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 30% (3/7) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.42 |
Aces Total | 0 | 115 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 0 | 55 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:27:13 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 243.08 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (939/1633) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (655/939) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 52% (363/694) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (57/135) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (616/1632) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (7/7) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (11/25) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (3/8) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 82% (11/9) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 18% (11/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 14% (14/2) |
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
No Past Matches Available
Benjamin Hassan Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Benjamin Hassan
56%
(
43 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
44 of
77)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Benjamin Hassan
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Giulio Zeppieri
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
70%
(
51 of
73)
7
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
24 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
71
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Carlos Taberner
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
56%
(
30 of
54)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
48%
(
42 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
78
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
David Goffin
Player
Benjamin Hassan
54%
(
56 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
10
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
1
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
43 of
60)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
2-6 7-6(8) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Hamza Karmoussi
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
65)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Benjamin Hassan
70%
(
54 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
42 of
80)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Cristian Garin
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Billy Harris
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
53 of
74)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more