Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Little vs Charles Broom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Little vs Broom analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Little vs Charles Broom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Little has won 44.32% of points on his second serve, while Broom has won 53.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Little, in recent form, has won 47.67% of his opponent's second serve points, while Broom has won 53.85%. The same stats for first serve returns are 18.52% and 31.23% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Little has saved 60% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broom has saved 64.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Little has won 40.91% of matches played (W/L 9/ 13), with Broom winning 55.56% (W/L 40/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Little has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 7). Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Little has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 42.86% of matches (W/L 9/ 12), where as Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 61.11% of matches (W/L 22/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Little winning 2 times. They have played 12 sets in total, with Little winning 5 and Broom winning 7. The last match between Little and Broom was at the M25 Nottingham, 03-05-2023, First, Hard with Daniel Little getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:36.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Little and Broom have played a deciding set 2 times, with Little winning 1 times and Broom 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Little winning 1, and Broom 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Little has played against opponents with an average rank of 296.05 while Broom has played against players with an average rank of 210.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Little has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broom has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Little has converted 60% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broom has converted 39.41% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Little 2 - 3 Broom
843
Rank
564
High
26
Age
Plays
2
Total3
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor2
0
Grass0
339
Rank
322
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
56% (92-72)
Career Total W/L
63% (196-116)
33% (1-2)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$36,000
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Little | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 7 |
| Games Won | 55 | 66 |
| Aces (Total) | 38 | 28 |
| DFs (Total) | 13 | 12 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:42:36 | 1:42:36 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (245/406) | 66% (215/326) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 70% (171/245) | 78% (168/215) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 43% (70/161) | 53% (59/111) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 53% (9/17) | 43% (16/37) |
| Return Points W% | 30% (99/326) | 41% (165/406) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (2/5) | 60% (3/5) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 7-5 7-6(6) |
Stats 
Daniel Little
Player
Charles Broom
49%
(
56 of
115)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
15
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
41 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
52 of
74)
46%
(
27 of
59)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
47 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
103)
105
Total Points Won
113
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Charles Broom
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
21 of
27)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
16 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
||||
| 6-4 5-7 6-1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Daniel Little
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
5
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
43 of
59)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| 6-2 7-6(2) |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Daniel Little
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
9
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
78)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
||||
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Daniel Little
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
90%
(
27 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
13 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Little | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 33% (1/2) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 51% (26/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 44% (28/36) | 50% (247/251) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 33% (1/2) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (7/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.6 |
| Aces Total | 11 | 147 |
| DFs per game | 0.16 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 5 | 62 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:55:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 138.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (120/208) | 63% (983/1559) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (91/120) | 71% (695/983) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (39/88) | 53% (308/576) |
| BPs Won% Total | 60% (3/5) | 34% (52/155) |
| Return Pts W% | 31% (61/194) | 39% (649/1684) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 60% (6/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 52% (11/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 67% (6/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 27% (11/3) |
Daniel Little Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Lorusso
Player
Daniel Little
52%
(
34 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
10
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Daniel Little
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
7
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Stijn Pel
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
38 of
46)
64%
(
21 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
26%
(
21 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
24 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tristan Lamasine
Player
Daniel Little
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Thomas Deschamps
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
20
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
34%
(
30 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
14 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Theo Papamalamis
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
52%
(
64 of
123)
12
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
83%
(
48 of
58)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
28%
(
26 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
47 of
123)
113
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrick Brady
Player
Daniel Little
84%
(
72 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oscar Weightman
Player
Daniel Little
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luc Koenig
Player
Daniel Little
66%
(
81 of
123)
1st Serve %
63%
(
80 of
127)
7
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
60 of
80)
52%
(
22 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
47)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
45 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
47 of
127)
125
Total Points Won
125
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Little
Player
Oscar Weightman
60%
(
64 of
107)
1st Serve %
53%
(
57 of
108)
12
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
7
77%
(
49 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
49%
(
21 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
44 of
108)
114
Total Points Won
101
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Charles Broom
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-0 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cash Hanzlik
Player
Charles Broom
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
36 of
42)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Charles Broom
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Lukas Pokorny
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Victor Lilov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Aidan Mchugh
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
107)
14
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Little Vs Broom Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Daniel Little
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
