Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Andrea Basso Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gimeno-Traver vs Basso analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Gimeno-Traver vs Andrea Basso Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Basso has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gimeno-Traver, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Basso has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gimeno-Traver has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Basso has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Basso winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gimeno-Traver has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 578/ 369), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 21% (W/L 6/ 22). Basso has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 212/ 154), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 27% (W/L 4/ 11).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gimeno-Traver winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gimeno-Traver winning 2 and Basso winning 0. The last match between Gimeno-Traver and Basso was at the Italy F34 (Santa Margherita Di Pula), 21-10-2017, Final, Clay with Daniel Gimeno-Traver getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:43:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gimeno-Traver and Basso have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gimeno-Traver winning 0 times and Basso 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gimeno-Traver winning 0, and Basso 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gimeno-Traver has played against opponents with an average rank of while Basso has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gimeno-Traver has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Basso has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gimeno-Traver has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Basso has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gimeno-Traver 1 - 0 Basso
Ret.
Rank
48
High
38
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
900
Rank
301
High
30
Age
L
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
57% (625-479)
Career Total W/L
56% (270-210)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,102,200
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gimeno-Traver VS Basso H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Andrea Basso |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:0 | 1:43:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 70% (50/71) | 66% (35/53) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 62% (31/50) | 60% (21/35) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (11/21) | 28% (5/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (27/53) | 41% (29/71) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Gimeno-Traver VS Basso H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Andrea Basso
70%
(
50 of
71)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Gimeno-Traver | Andrea Basso |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Gimeno-Traver Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve %
49%
(
33 of
68)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
67%
(
18 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ernests Gulbis
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
8
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
16 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Javier Barranco Cosano
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
37%
(
18 of
49)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mario Vilella Martinez
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Viktor Galovic
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
10
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
31 of
36)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
23 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
17%
(
6 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
23
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
Player
Pol Toledo Bague
66%
(
63 of
95)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
13
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
88)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabien Reboul
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
12
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
10 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
34 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
84
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Daniel Gimeno-Traver
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Andrea Basso Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Andrea Basso
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
64
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Basso
Player
Davide Galoppini
52%
(
41 of
79)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
77%
(
10 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Basso
Player
Giorgio Tabacco
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
31 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
34 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Basso
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
44%
(
14 of
32)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
9 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Titouan Droguet
Player
Andrea Basso
69%
(
68 of
99)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
90)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
38%
(
38 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
90)
103
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrea Basso
Player
Davide Galoppini
47%
(
33 of
70)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andrea Basso
Player
Nicolo Pozzani
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Basso
Player
Giuseppe La Vela
52%
(
47 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
53%
(
23 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
94)
102
Total Points Won
82
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sandro Kopp
Player
Andrea Basso
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
57%
(
42 of
74)
3
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Andrea Basso
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Gimeno-Traver Vs Basso Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
