Daniel Evans vs Martin Landaluce Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 May at 10:38 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Evans vs M. Landaluce

GBR
0
Win
Played
1
Win

ESP
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Evans 0 - 1 Landaluce
They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniel Evans winning 0 and Martin Landaluce winning 2. The last match between Martin Landaluce and Daniel Evans was at the Prague Challenger, 07-05-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Martin Landaluce getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Evans | 0 |
| Landaluce | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Prague Challenger(05-07-25)
D. Evans vs M. Landaluce H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $5,215,870 | Career Prize Money | $301,960 |
| 58.90% (589-411) | Career Total W/L | 56.15% (105-82) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 24 | Titles | 3 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 53.85% (7-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 16.67% (1-5) |
D. Evans vs M. Landaluce Match Preview:
- How do Evans and Landaluce compare in recent second serve performance? Evans edges out with a 45.73% success rate, slightly higher than Landaluce's 44.06%.
- When it comes to returning, Landaluce has the advantage, winning 48.63% on second serve returns compared to Evans' 44.72%. First serve return percentages are close, with Evans at 28.45% and Landaluce at 27.24%.
- Under pressure, Evans is slightly better at saving breakpoints, with a success rate of 52.29% compared to Landaluce's 51.32%.
- How about overall performance in the past year? Landaluce has been more successful, winning 58.46% of their matches, whereas Evans has won only 44.9%.
- Surface preferences also give us insights. Evans performs best on indoor hard courts (62% wins), while his weakest is clay (46%). Landaluce excels on hard courts with a 64% victory rate, but struggles more on indoor hard (43%).
- What about experience against different caliber opponents? Evans typically faces tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 194.86, while Landaluce's opponents average 265.17.
- In deciding sets, Landaluce has a better record, winning 52% as opposed to Evans' 44% win rate.
- Both players are similar in converting breakpoints with Evans at 37.76% and Landaluce at 36.67%, which could be pivotal in live games.
Editorial Prediction (May 7, 2025, UTC):
As Evans and Landaluce face off, the statistics highlight key areas for an intriguing match. Evans has the upper hand in recent second serve success and break saving efficiency. However, Landaluce's superior return game could offset this advantage.
Although Evans competes against stronger opponents, Landaluce's overall performance in various competitions gives him a formidable edge. This is evident in his higher win rate over the past year and better performance in crucial deciding sets.
Surface-wise, both players have distinct strengths, but Evans' proficiency on indoor hard courts could prove advantageous. This battle might hinge on match conditions and who can capitalize on their favorable statistics during pivotal moments.
Considering the broader performance metrics and recent trends, Landaluce seems more likely to emerge victorious in this encounter, although the match is expected to be highly competitive.
Daniel Evans vs Martin Landaluce Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Evans vs M. Landaluce H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 6 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:26:41 | Average Match Time | 1:26:41 |
| 48% (29/61) | 1st Serve % | 57% (32/56) |
| 48% (14/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (21/32) |
| 38% (12/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 57% (4/7) | Break Pts Won % | 64% (7/11) |
| 45% (25/56) | Return Points Win % | 57% (35/61) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Evans Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 4-6 1-2 ret. | ||
R2 | W | 3-6 7-6(7) 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 3-6 2-2 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
M. Landaluce Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
SF | L | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 7-5 | ||

D. Evans vs M. Landaluce Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.90% (589/411) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.15% (105/82) |
| 56.88% (1398/1060) | Sets Win/Loss | 53.66% (242/209) |
| 52.28% (12366/11289) | Games Win/Loss | 51.46% (2227/2101) |
| 60.91% (254/163) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.65% (52/31) |
| 46.15% (54/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 47.22% (34/38) |
| 61.56% (181/113) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.00% (11/9) |
| 58.14% (100/72) | Grass Win/Loss | 66.67% (8/4) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 2819 | Aces Total | 728 |
| 0.18 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.36 |
| 2037 | Total Double Faults | 767 |
| 1:8:24 | Average Match Time | 1:53:7 |
| 114.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 316.1 |
| 61% (30518/50133) | 1st Serve % | 63% (8623/13792) |
| 71% (21652/30518) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (5961/8623) |
| 51% (9937/19614) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2533/5169) |
| 41% (1902/4621) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (570/1429) |
| 38% (19172/50158) | Return Points Win % | 40% (5573/13976) |
| 51.61% (48/45) | Slam W/L | 63.64% (7/4) |
| 41.77% (33/46) | Masters W/L | 44.44% (4/5) |
| 43.48% (20/26) | Cups W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 52.56% (113/102) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/9) |
| 61.23% (169/107) | Challenger W/L | 58.26% (67/48) |
| 70.93% (205/84) | Futures W/L | 64.29% (27/15) |
| 60% (545/902) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (104/184) |
| 46% (40/87) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 53% (189/359) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (28/63) |
| 54% (184/339) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (42/74) |
| 85% (581/492) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (100/84) |
| 15% (581/86) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (100/16) |
| 24% (418/99) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (87/21) |