Daniel Evans vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
D. Evans vs C. Lam Coleman Wong

Daniel Evans

GBR

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'9" (175 cm)

Height

188

C. Rank

151

Best Rank

128

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$5.2M

Career Money

$539.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

HKG

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

5'9" (175 cm)

Height

188

C. Rank

151

Best Rank

128

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$5.2M

Career Money

$539.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Head-to-head: Evans 0 - 1 Wong

They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniel Evans winning 0 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2. The last match between Chak Lam Coleman Wong and Daniel Evans was at the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger, 26-09-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-4 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Evans	0
Wong	1

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Nonthaburi 4 Challenger(09-26-24)

Stats

Chak Lam Coleman Wong

Daniel Evans

D. Evans vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Profile

D. Evans	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
$5,215,870	Career Prize Money	$538,970
58.90% (589-411)	Career Total W/L	55.78% (164-130)
0	Hard	1
24	Titles	2
0	Total H2H Matches	1
53.85% (7-6)	YTD Win/Loss	45.45% (5-6)

D. Evans vs C. L. C. Wong Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Daniel Evans has won 43.72% of points on their second serve, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 46.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Daniel Evans, in recent form, has won 47.76% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 44.63%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.19% and 22.77% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Daniel Evans has saved 54.23% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chak Lam Coleman Wong has saved 51.48% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Daniel Evans has won 46.81% of matches played (W/L 22/25), with Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 51.61% (W/L 32/30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Daniel Evans has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 169/104), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 54/63). Chak Lam Coleman Wong has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 129/90), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 6/8).
Player level: In the last year, Daniel Evans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/15), where as Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 20/16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Daniel Evans winning 0 times and Chak Lam Coleman Wong being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniel Evans winning 0 and Chak Lam Coleman Wong winning 2.
The last match between Daniel Evans and Chak Lam Coleman Wong was at the Nonthaburi 4 Challenger, 26-09-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Chak Lam Coleman Wong getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:7:38.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Daniel Evans has played against opponents with an average rank of 222.17 while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has played against players with an average rank of 205.05.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Daniel Evans has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chak Lam Coleman Wong has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Daniel Evans has converted 39.02% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chak Lam Coleman Wong has converted 33.76% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Daniel Evans vs Chak Lam Coleman Wong Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

D. Evans vs C. L. C. Wong H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

D. Evans	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
0	H2H Matches Won	1
0	Sets Won	2
9	Games Won	13
2	Aces (Total)	10
3	Total Double Faults	2
2:7:38	Average Match Time	2:7:38
43% (31/72)	1st Serve %	64% (56/87)
61% (19/31)	1st Serve Win %	64% (36/56)
54% (22/41)	2nd Serve Win %	55% (17/31)
18% (2/11)	Break Pts Won %	33% (4/12)
39% (34/87)	Return Points Win %	43% (31/72)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

D. Evans Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Guangzhou Challenger - 08-09-2025
QF Juan Manuel CerundoloJ. Manuel	L	4-6 1-2 ret.	Stats
R2 Oliver CrawfordO. Crawford	W	3-6 7-6(7) 6-1	Stats
R1 Charles ChenC. Chen	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
Shanghai Challenger - 01-09-2025
R2 Filip PeliwoF. Peliwo	L	6-4 3-6 2-2 ret.	Stats
R1 Linang XiaoL. Xiao	W	6-4 6-4	Stats

View All

C. L. C. Wong Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Taipei Challenger - 03-11-2025
SF James DuckworthJ. Duckworth	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
QF Maxime JanvierM. Janvier	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R2 Tsung-Hao HuangT. Huang	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
R1 Luca CastelnuovoL. Castelnuovo	W	6-4 4-6 7-5	Stats
Seoul Challenger - 27-10-2025
F Sho ShimabukuroS. Shimabukuro	L	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

D. Evans vs C. L. C. Wong Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

D. Evans	Stats	C. L. C. Wong
58.90% (589/411)	YTD Win/Loss	55.78% (164/130)
56.88% (1398/1060)	Sets Win/Loss	54.07% (372/316)
52.28% (12366/11289)	Games Win/Loss	51.16% (3419/3264)
60.91% (254/163)	Hard Win/Loss	58.90% (129/90)
46.15% (54/63)	Clay Win/Loss	46.51% (20/23)
61.56% (181/113)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (9/9)
58.14% (100/72)	Grass Win/Loss	42.86% (6/8)
0.24	Aces Per Game	0.52
2819	Aces Total	1687
0.18	Double Faults Per Game	0.18
2037	Total Double Faults	603
1:8:24	Average Match Time	1:31:40
493.87	Average Opponent Rank	371.21
61% (30518/50133)	1st Serve %	60% (11331/18739)
71% (21652/30518)	1st Serve Win %	71% (8054/11331)
51% (9937/19614)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (3631/7408)
41% (1902/4621)	Break Points Won % (Total)	41% (703/1718)
38% (19172/50158)	Return Points Win %	38% (7230/18830)
51.61% (48/45)	Slam W/L	53.33% (8/7)
41.77% (33/46)	Masters W/L	46.67% (7/8)
43.48% (20/26)	Cups W/L	62.50% (5/3)
52.56% (113/102)	Main Tour W/L	27.27% (3/8)
61.23% (169/107)	Challenger W/L	55.65% (69/55)
70.93% (205/84)	Futures W/L	59.50% (72/49)
60% (545/902)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	55% (157/286)
46% (40/87)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	83% (5/6)
53% (189/359)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	55% (56/102)
54% (184/339)	Deciding Set Win %	54% (51/94)
85% (581/492)	1st Set Won, Won Match	87% (157/136)
15% (581/86)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	13% (157/21)
24% (418/99)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (137/27)