Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Brands vs Victor Hanescu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brands vs Hanescu analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Brands vs Victor Hanescu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brands has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Hanescu has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brands, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Hanescu has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brands has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hanescu has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brands has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Hanescu winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brands has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 112/ 85), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 165/ 141). Hanescu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 312/ 191), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 37% (W/L 50/ 86).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Brands winning 1 times. They have played 9 sets in total, with Brands winning 3 and Hanescu winning 6. The last match between Brands and Hanescu was at the Credit Agricole Suisse Open - Gstaad, 26-07-2013, Quarterfinals, Clay with Victor Hanescu getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:47:36.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Brands and Hanescu have played a deciding set 0 times, with Brands winning 0 times and Hanescu 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Brands winning 1, and Hanescu 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brands has played against opponents with an average rank of while Hanescu has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brands has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hanescu has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brands has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hanescu has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Brands 1 - 2 Hanescu
Ret.
Rank
51
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
1
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
26
High
42
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
L
56% (482-380)
Career Total W/L
54% (474-398)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$765,635
Career Prize Money
$1,745,580
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Brands | Victor Hanescu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 2 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 6 |
| Games Won | 42 | 47 |
| Aces (Total) | 33 | 34 |
| DFs (Total) | 12 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:47:36 | 0:47:36 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (157/257) | 69% (193/281) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (123/157) | 75% (145/193) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (55/100) | 59% (52/88) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 25% (4/16) | 36% (5/14) |
| Return Points W% | 29% (84/286) | 30% (79/261) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 67% (3/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Victor Hanescu
Player
Daniel Brands
65%
(
43 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
36 of
50)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
63
Total Points Won
53
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
5
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
79%
(
15 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 6-7(7) 6-7(3) 7-6(7) 6-3 3-0 ret. |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Victor Hanescu
60%
(
89 of
149)
1st Serve %
70%
(
108 of
154)
24
Aces
23
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
73 of
89)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
82 of
108)
62%
(
37 of
60)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
39 of
149)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
48 of
154)
158
Total Points Won
145
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Brands | Victor Hanescu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Brands Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Daniel Brands
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
118)
18
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
58 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
36 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
58 of
118)
134
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Blaz Rola
66%
(
93 of
140)
1st Serve %
73%
(
80 of
109)
16
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
47 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
30 of
109)
123
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(5) 7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Mark Whitehouse
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Alex Bolt
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Feliciano Lopez
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
76%
(
67 of
88)
20
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Ryan Peniston
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Daniel Brands
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Victor Hanescu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Radek Stepanek
Player
Victor Hanescu
64%
(
58 of
91)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
82)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
40 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Juan Carlos Saez
Player
Victor Hanescu
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
62 of
94)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
91
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Facundo Mena
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Stefan Kozlov
72%
(
61 of
85)
1st Serve %
55%
(
69 of
125)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
34%
(
29 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
125)
108
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Peter Nagy
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
65
Total Points Won
40
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Jason Murray Kubler
75%
(
50 of
67)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
10
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Victor Hanescu
63%
(
64 of
101)
1st Serve %
69%
(
78 of
113)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
35 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
45 of
113)
111
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Christopher Diaz-Figueroa
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
26 of
65)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Victor Hanescu
Player
Kaichi Uchida
77%
(
86 of
112)
1st Serve %
56%
(
55 of
98)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
42 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
32 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
108
|
6-3 3-6 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pere Riba
Player
Victor Hanescu
64%
(
55 of
86)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
5
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
41 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Brands Vs Hanescu Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
