Daniel Brands vs Roberto Quiroz Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brands vs Quiroz analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Brands vs Roberto Quiroz Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brands has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Quiroz has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brands, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Quiroz has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brands has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Quiroz has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brands has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Quiroz winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brands has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 112/ 85), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 165/ 141). Quiroz has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 134/ 103), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 30/ 32).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Brands winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Brands winning 2 and Quiroz winning 0. The last match between Brands and Quiroz was at the Recanati Challenger, 07-07-2018, Semifinals, Hard with Daniel Brands getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:52:8.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Brands and Quiroz have played a deciding set 0 times, with Brands winning 0 times and Quiroz 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Brands winning 0, and Quiroz 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brands has played against opponents with an average rank of while Quiroz has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brands has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Quiroz has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brands has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Quiroz has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Brands 1 - 0 Quiroz
13
Total
0
Mast
7
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Ret.
Rank
51
High
36
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
759
Rank
172
High
32
Age
L
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
56% (482-380)
Career Total W/L
54% (302-255)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$765,635
Career Prize Money
$98,220
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Daniel Brands | Roberto Quiroz |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 3 |
Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 0:52:8 | 0:52:8 |
1st Serve % | 67% (31/46) | 64% (29/45) |
1st Serve Win% | 81% (25/31) | 59% (17/29) |
2nd Serve Win% | 53% (8/15) | 31% (5/16) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/1) |
Return Points W% | 51% (23/45) | 28% (13/46) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-3 |
Daniel Brands
Player
Roberto Quiroz
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
13 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Daniel Brands | Roberto Quiroz |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Brands Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Daniel Brands
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
118)
18
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
58 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
36 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
58 of
118)
134
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Daniel Brands
Player
Blaz Rola
66%
(
93 of
140)
1st Serve %
73%
(
80 of
109)
16
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
47 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
30 of
109)
123
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(5) 7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Brands
Player
Mark Whitehouse
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tommy Paul
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Brands
Player
Alex Bolt
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Feliciano Lopez
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
76%
(
67 of
88)
20
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Brands
Player
Ryan Peniston
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Daniel Brands
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H |
view more
Roberto Quiroz Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Roberto Quiroz
75%
(
49 of
65)
1st Serve %
77%
(
59 of
77)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Roberto Quiroz
66%
(
48 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
2
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
27 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
19 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
70
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Roberto Quiroz
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
77%
(
69 of
90)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
36 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
90)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(1) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ben Shelton
Player
Roberto Quiroz
63%
(
55 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
32 of
87)
92
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Cannon Kingsley
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Roberto Quiroz
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Rubber 5 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Rubber 1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Alessandro Giannessi
Player
Roberto Quiroz
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
41%
(
14 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
47)
38
Total Points Won
43
|
1-6 5-1 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Roberto Quiroz
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
42 of
57)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more