Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Brands vs Jan Minar Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Brands vs Minar analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Brands vs Jan Minar Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Brands has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Minar has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Brands, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Minar has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Brands has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Minar has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Brands has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Minar winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Brands has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 112/ 85), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 165/ 141). Minar has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 97/ 60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 2/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Brands winning 3 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Brands winning 6 and Minar winning 1. The last match between Brands and Minar was at the Eckental Challenger, 04-11-2009, First, Carpet with Daniel Brands getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Brands and Minar have played a deciding set 1 times, with Brands winning 1 times and Minar 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 4 tiebreaks against each other with Brands winning 3, and Minar 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Brands has played against opponents with an average rank of while Minar has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Brands has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Minar has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Brands has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Minar has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Brands 3 - 0 Minar
Ret.
Rank
51
High
36
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
2
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
177
High
43
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
56% (482-380)
Career Total W/L
56% (328-254)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$765,635
Career Prize Money
$61,250
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Brands | Jan Minar |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 6 | 1 |
| Games Won | 45 | 37 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 25% (1/4) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 7-6(3) | |||||
| 6-4 6-4 | |||||
| 6-4 6-7(3) 7-6(3) | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Brands | Jan Minar |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Brands Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Daniel Brands
64%
(
72 of
112)
1st Serve %
64%
(
75 of
118)
18
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
2
81%
(
58 of
72)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
45 of
75)
45%
(
18 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
15 of
43)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
36 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
58 of
118)
134
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Blaz Rola
66%
(
93 of
140)
1st Serve %
73%
(
80 of
109)
16
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
61 of
80)
43%
(
20 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
34%
(
47 of
140)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
30 of
109)
123
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(5) 7-6(7) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Mark Whitehouse
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
69%
(
33 of
48)
10
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tommy Paul
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
44 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Alex Bolt
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
56
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Feliciano Lopez
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
70 of
101)
1st Serve %
76%
(
67 of
88)
20
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
53 of
70)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
53 of
67)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
31%
(
31 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
99
Total Points Won
90
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Brands
Player
Ryan Peniston
71%
(
49 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
34 of
45)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Laaksonen
Player
Daniel Brands
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
61%
(
27 of
44)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Koepfer
Player
Daniel Brands
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
38%
(
17 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Pablo Cuevas
Player
Daniel Brands
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
28 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Jan Minar Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mikalai Haliak
Player
Jan Minar
56%
(
55 of
99)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
41%
(
18 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
91
Total Points Won
87
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marek Jaloviec
Player
Jan Minar
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
7
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
72%
(
18 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Minar
Player
Dominik Boehler
72%
(
71 of
99)
1st Serve %
59%
(
66 of
111)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
29 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
41 of
111)
111
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(9) 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Minar
Player
Daniel Lustig
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
36 of
48)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Jan Minar
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Minar
Player
Danylo Kalenichenko
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
6
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
16%
(
7 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jan Minar
Player
Adam Majchrowicz
72%
(
81 of
112)
1st Serve %
66%
(
66 of
100)
3
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
52 of
66)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
41 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
37 of
100)
108
Total Points Won
104
|
7-6(4) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-7(6) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gleb Sakharov
Player
Jan Minar
42%
(
27 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
45 of
76)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Brands Vs Minar Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
