Daniel Blazka vs Noah Martens Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Nov at 12:33 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Blazka vs N. Martens

CZE
0
Win
Played
1
Win

BEL
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Blazka 0 - 1 Martens
They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniel Blazka winning 0 and Noah Martens winning 2. The last match between Noah Martens and Daniel Blazka was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 05-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Noah Martens getting the victory 6-0 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Blazka | 0 |
| Martens | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Sharm ElSheikh(11-05-25)
D. Blazka vs N. Martens H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 14.74% (14-81) | Career Total W/L | 47.62% (10-11) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
D. Blazka vs N. Martens Match Preview:
- Daniel Blazka excels in second serve performance, boasting a flawless 100% win rate over the past six months, while Noah Martens manages just 46.02% in the same area.
- Curiously, Blazka's recent return game shows no success against opponents' second serves, yet Martens has secured 44.09% of these points.
- Both players perform similarly when returning first serves, as Blazka captures 28.57% to Martens' 27.61%.
- Under pressure, Martens exhibits resilience by saving 65.22% of breakpoints, leaving Blazka with a concerning 0% save rate.
- Considering overall win-loss records over the past year, Martens displays more consistency, winning 50% of his matches, whereas Blazka struggles with a 22.86% win rate.
- On hard surfaces, both players have a career win rate of 19%, but Martens fares better on clay with a 38% success rate compared to Blazka's 0%.
- At the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, Martens' 50% win rate surpasses Blazka’s 22.86% over the past year.
- Though Blazka faces slightly higher-ranked opponents on average (47.97), Martens' opponent quality is undefined, hinting at lower-ranked competitions.
- In deciding set scenarios, Martens has a 50% success rate, overshadowing Blazka’s 29% over the last twelve months.
Editorial Prediction (November 5, 2025, UTC):
The statistics reveal distinct differences in each player's game. Daniel Blazka's impeccable second serve performance is a standout strength, suggesting he might dominate service games. However, his negligible return game and inability to save breakpoints could be detrimental against a competitor like Noah Martens, who shows competent return skills.
Noah Martens seems to be the more balanced player, showcasing solid breakpoint defense and a 50% win rate in matches over the last year. His ability to cope under pressure, combined with consistent performance on diverse surfaces, suggests a tactical advantage.
Considering these factors, Noah Martens emerges as the likely favorite to win the upcoming tennis match, exploiting Blazka's vulnerabilities while relying on his own well-rounded gameplay to secure victory.
Daniel Blazka vs Noah Martens Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Blazka vs N. Martens H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 0 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 0:47:47 | Average Match Time | 0:47:47 |
| 62% (28/45) | 1st Serve % | 48% (13/27) |
| 39% (11/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 92% (12/13) |
| 29% (5/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 86% (12/14) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Pts Won % | 55% (6/11) |
| 11% (3/27) | Return Points Win % | 64% (29/45) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Blazka Recent Matches Played
N. Martens Recent Matches Played

D. Blazka vs N. Martens Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 14.74% (14/81) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.62% (10/11) |
| 17.50% (35/165) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.98% (24/25) |
| 33.79% (593/1162) | Games Win/Loss | 50.48% (262/257) |
| 19.18% (14/59) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.50% (5/3) |
| 0.00% (0/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.46% (5/8) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 4 | Aces Total | 25 |
| 0.02 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.12 |
| 16 | Total Double Faults | 30 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 92.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 65.1 |
| 60% (138/230) | 1st Serve % | 54% (309/571) |
| 49% (68/138) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (225/309) |
| 34% (31/92) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (134/262) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 32% (24/76) |
| 25% (53/209) | Return Points Win % | 39% (263/667) |
| 14.74% (14/81) | Futures W/L | 47.62% (10/11) |
| 14% (13/93) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 57% (4/7) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 33% (2/6) |
| 33% (4/12) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (3/7) |
| 76% (17/13) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (11/9) |
| 24% (17/4) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (11/2) |
| 1% (78/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (10/1) |