Daniel Altmaier vs Chun Hsin Tseng Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Apr at 04:08 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Altmaier vs C. Hsin Tseng

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win

TPE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Altmaier 1 - 0 Tseng
They have played 2 sets in total, with Daniel Altmaier winning 2 and Chun Hsin Tseng winning 0. The last match between Daniel Altmaier and Chun Hsin Tseng was at the BMW Open - Munich, 14-04-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(5) 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Altmaier | 1 |
| Tseng | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) BMW Open - Munich(04-14-25)
D. Altmaier vs C. H. Tseng H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $2,384,945 | Career Prize Money | $394,315 |
| 59.38% (424-290) | Career Total W/L | 57.38% (272-202) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 16 | Titles | 10 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 44.00% (22-28) | YTD Win/Loss | 26.32% (5-14) |
D. Altmaier vs C. H. Tseng Match Preview:
Analyzing recent performance on second serves reveals Tseng's edge, having secured 46.97% of points over the last six months, compared to Altmaier's 45.55%. This slight advantage on second serve is indicative of Tseng's marginally better control in this aspect, which correlates highly with match prediction accuracy.
Return game statistics offer a different insight. Altmaier surpasses Tseng by winning 47.08% of their opponents' second serve points, while Tseng managed to win 45.76%. However, Tseng shows a greater proficiency in handling first serves, winning 25.41% of points, whereas Altmaier has achieved 22.76%. This particular metric is often predictive of who may hold the upper hand in their upcoming head-to-head match-up.
When facing pressure situations like breakpoints, Altmaier again displays a minor advantage, having saved 57.64% of breakpoints compared to Tseng's 56.5%. Though both players show resilience, Altmaier's slight lead in this area can contribute useful insights for in-game betting scenarios.
The overall performance over the past year shows Tseng with a superior win rate of 56.41%, indicated by a win/loss record of 44/34, while Altmaier holds a 50.67% win rate and a record of 38/37. This data supplies a broader view of their competitive consistency and suggests Tseng's slight superiority overall.
Both players find clay courts to be their optimal surfaces, with Tseng winning 62% on clay, whereas Altmaier records a similar 61%. Their struggle on grass is notable; Tseng has yet to secure a victory on that surface, while Altmaier claims a 36% win rate. This reinforces the prediction that the match outcome may largely hinge on the surface they play on.
Focusing on the level of competition they face, Tseng has predominantly competed in Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 64.58% of these matches. On the other hand, Altmaier has contended mainly on the Main tour, standing with a 42.86% win rate. The disparity in competition caliber, with Tseng frequently playing against lower-ranked players (average rank 244) compared to Altmaier's opponents (average rank 137.71), is essential for framing predictions relative to the level of play.
Tseng has shown a strong proficiency in deciding set victories, winning 62% of them in the past year. Comparatively, Altmaier has a 57% success rate. This could prove crucial should the match extend to a deciding set, lending an edge to Tseng based on historical performance.
Converting breakpoints can often tip the scales during a match, and Tseng leads with a conversion rate of 27.91% versus Altmaier's 26.88%. This metric accentuates Tseng’s slight advantage in capitalizing on pivotal moments.
Based on these statistical comparisons across several metrics, Tseng emerges as the marginal favorite due to his consistent performance metrics, slight edge in pivotal areas like breakpoint conversion and deciding set victories, as well as an overall higher win percentage compared to Altmaier.
Daniel Altmaier vs Chun Hsin Tseng Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Altmaier vs C. H. Tseng H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 14 | Games Won | 12 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 2:15:15 | Average Match Time | 2:15:15 |
| 56% (50/89) | 1st Serve % | 63% (49/78) |
| 84% (42/50) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (33/49) |
| 36% (14/39) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (15/29) |
| 100% (3/3) | Break Pts Won % | 27% (3/11) |
| 38% (30/78) | Return Points Win % | 37% (33/89) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Altmaier Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-4 7-6(6) | ||
R2 | W | 4-6 6-0 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R3 | L | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 7-5 | ||
C. H. Tseng Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 2-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
QF | W | 4-6 6-1 7-6(11) | ||
R2 | W | 1-6 6-2 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||

D. Altmaier vs C. H. Tseng Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.38% (424/290) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.38% (272/202) |
| 57.31% (957/713) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.49% (622/499) |
| 52.58% (8392/7567) | Games Win/Loss | 52.14% (5479/5030) |
| 59.83% (137/92) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.91% (104/82) |
| 61.00% (208/133) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.57% (141/88) |
| 59.32% (70/48) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (26/26) |
| 34.62% (9/17) | Grass Win/Loss | 14.29% (1/6) |
| 0.48 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 |
| 3775 | Aces Total | 1238 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 1362 | Total Double Faults | 1127 |
| 1:32:16 | Average Match Time | 1:43:24 |
| 409.16 | Average Opponent Rank | 418.34 |
| 61% (27274/44468) | 1st Serve % | 59% (19213/32542) |
| 72% (19548/27274) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (13002/19213) |
| 50% (8618/17194) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (6834/13329) |
| 42% (1792/4301) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1428/3438) |
| 39% (17447/44868) | Return Points Win % | 41% (13323/32722) |
| 50.00% (18/18) | Slam W/L | 31.58% (6/13) |
| 45.61% (26/31) | Masters W/L | 39.13% (9/14) |
| 50.00% (2/2) | Cups W/L | 57.14% (8/6) |
| 40.29% (56/83) | Main Tour W/L | 30.23% (13/30) |
| 66.05% (142/73) | Challenger W/L | 60.07% (167/111) |
| 68.44% (180/83) | Futures W/L | 71.13% (69/28) |
| 60% (401/664) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (266/452) |
| 47% (16/34) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 7% (1/15) |
| 56% (144/259) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (66/139) |
| 56% (114/204) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (86/161) |
| 88% (418/369) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (269/225) |
| 12% (418/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (269/44) |
| 18% (296/54) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (205/47) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Varvara Lepchenko vs Panna Udvardy Betting Tips & Picks November 30, 2025

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
