Prediction of Dane Webb vs Benjamin Rogers Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
D. Webb vs B. Rogers

Dane Webb

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Benjamin Rogers

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Webb 1 - 0 Rogers

They have played 2 sets in total, with Dane Webb winning 2 and Benjamin Rogers winning 0. The last match between Dane Webb and Benjamin Rogers was at the Tulsa Challenger, 12-09-2011, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Dane Webb getting the victory 7-5 7-6(3).

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Webb	1
Rogers	0

Last H2H Matches:

(Q1) Tulsa Challenger(09-12-11)

Stats

Dane Webb

Benjamin Rogers

D. Webb vs B. Rogers H2H Profile

D. Webb	Stats	B. Rogers
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
58.82% (80-56)	Career Total W/L	23.08% (3-10)
1	Hard	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

D. Webb vs B. Rogers Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Dane Webb has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Benjamin Rogers has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Dane Webb, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Benjamin Rogers has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Dane Webb has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Benjamin Rogers has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Dane Webb has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Benjamin Rogers winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Dane Webb has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 59/38), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 14/12). Benjamin Rogers has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 3/5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/3).
Player level: In the last year, Dane Webb has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Benjamin Rogers has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Dane Webb winning 1 times and Benjamin Rogers being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Dane Webb winning 2 and Benjamin Rogers winning 0.
The last match between Dane Webb and Benjamin Rogers was at the Tulsa Challenger, 12-09-2011, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Dane Webb getting the victory 7-5 7-6(3).
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Dane Webb has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Benjamin Rogers has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Dane Webb has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Benjamin Rogers has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Dane Webb has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Benjamin Rogers has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Dane Webb vs Benjamin Rogers Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

D. Webb vs B. Rogers H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

D. Webb	Stats	B. Rogers
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
14	Games Won	11
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

D. Webb Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
USA F39 - 28-11-2016
R1 Tim Van RijthovenT. Van	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Q1 Michael NottM. Nott	W	6-4 6-2	Stats
Q3 Guanarteme Nuez DelgadoG. Nuez	W	3-6 6-3 6-4	Stats
Q2 Eduardo RazzetoE. Razzeto	W	4-6 6-3 6-1	Stats
USA F37 - 14-11-2016
Q1 Vadym KalyuzhnyyV. Kalyuzhnyy	W	6-7(3) 6-3 6-1	Stats

View All

B. Rogers Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
USA F26 - 10-10-2011
R1 Boris Nicola BakalovB. Nicola	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Tulsa Challenger - 12-09-2011
Q1 Dane WebbD. Webb	L	7-5 7-6(3)	Stats
Savannah Challenger - 02-05-2011
Q1 Anthony MuleA. Mule	L	2-6 6-2 6-2	Stats
Knoxville Challenger - 08-11-2010
Q1 Travis ParrottT. Parrott	L	6-2 7-5	Stats
Knoxville Challenger - 09-11-2009
Q2 Michael McCluneM. McClune	L	6-3 6-4	Stats

View All

D. Webb vs B. Rogers Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

D. Webb	Stats	B. Rogers
58.82% (80/56)	YTD Win/Loss	23.08% (3/10)
56.72% (173/132)	Sets Win/Loss	27.59% (8/21)
53.51% (1496/1300)	Games Win/Loss	41.35% (110/156)
60.82% (59/38)	Hard Win/Loss	0.00% (0/3)
53.85% (14/12)	Clay Win/Loss	0.00% (0/2)
53.85% (7/6)	Indoor Hard W/L	37.50% (3/5)
0.07	Aces Per Game	0
94	Aces Total	0
0.05	Double Faults Per Game	0
64	Total Double Faults	0
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
336.53	Average Opponent Rank	271
66% (1050/1579)	1st Serve %	0% (0/0)
67% (704/1050)	1st Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
46% (244/529)	2nd Serve Win %	0% (0/0)
47% (59/126)	Break Points Won % (Total)	0% (0/0)
36% (575/1576)	Return Points Win %	0% (0/0)
35.71% (5/9)	Challenger W/L	30.00% (3/7)
61.48% (75/47)	Futures W/L	0.00% (0/3)
59% (79/135)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	23% (3/13)
35% (9/26)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	50% (2/4)
59% (20/34)	Deciding Set Win %	33% (1/3)
90% (73/66)	1st Set Won, Won Match	67% (3/2)
10% (73/7)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	33% (3/1)
22% (63/14)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	10% (10/1)