Dane Sweeny vs Carl Emil Overbeck Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 23 Oct at 03:09 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

D. Sweeny vs C. Emil Overbeck

Dane Sweeny
Dane Sweeny

Flag AUS AUS

w
l
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
Carl Emil Overbeck
Carl Emil Overbeck

Flag DEN DEN

l
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
l

2

Win

2

Played

0

Win

24
Age
24
5'7" (170 cm)
Height
-
182
C. Rank
523
182
Best Rank
523
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$346.1K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Sweeny 2 - 0 Overbeck

They have played 5 sets in total, with Dane Sweeny winning 4 and Carl Emil Overbeck winning 1. The last match between Dane Sweeny and Carl Emil Overbeck was at the M25 Brisbane, 02-11-2025, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Dane Sweeny getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-3 6-2.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Sweeny2
Overbeck0
Last 2 H2H Matches:

(FM25 Brisbane(11-02-25)

Hard
AUS Flag
Dane Sweeny
6
6
6
DEN Flag
Carl Emil Overbeck
7
3
2

(R2M25 Brisbane(10-23-25)

Hard
AUS Flag
Dane Sweeny
6
6
DEN Flag
Carl Emil Overbeck
4
1

D. Sweeny vs C. E. Overbeck H2H Profile

Stats
$346,065Career Prize Money$0
60.15% (243-161)Career Total W/L65.48% (55-29)
2Hard0
15Titles0
2Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

D. Sweeny vs C. E. Overbeck Match Preview:

  • How do the players' second serve performances compare? Dane Sweeny has recently managed to secure 42.26% of points on his second serve, slightly edging out Carl Emil Overbeck, who records 41.42%.
  • In return game performance, how do they stand? Sweeny gains a small advantage by winning 47.96% of points on his opponent's second serve, compared to Overbeck’s 47.70%.
  • Do their first serve return game stats hint at any edge? Overbeck leads with a 30.34% return rate on first serves, while Sweeny trails at 29.10%.
  • How do they cope under pressure on breakpoints? Sweeny has saved breakpoints 52.55% of the time, surpassing Overbeck's 48.62% success rate.
  • Looking at their match records over the past year, Sweeny has maintained a win rate of 69.23%, whereas Overbeck stands at 60.00%.
  • Where do they perform best? Both excel on hard surfaces, with each achieving a 63% win rate. However, Sweeny struggles more on indoor hard courts than Overbeck does on clay.
  • When comparing match levels, Sweeny has dominated Futures/Satellites/ITF events, winning 79.73% of his matches compared to Overbeck’s 62.50% in similar events.
  • Assessing opponent quality, Overbeck has faced tougher competition, with his opponents averaging a rank of 372.08 versus Sweeny’s 380.87.
  • In deciding sets, Sweeny prevails 70% of the time, presenting a considerable edge over Overbeck’s 60% success rate.

Editorial Prediction (October 23, 2025, UTC):

When examining the second serve success, Dane Sweeny shows a subtle advantage with a marginally higher win rate than Carl Emil Overbeck. This could prove significant as second serve performance is highly correlated with match outcomes.

While first serve return stats favor Overbeck slightly, Sweeny compensates with superior breakpoint saving abilities, suggesting resilience in critical moments.

Both players are comfortable on hard courts; however, Sweeny’s consistently better win rate on the ITF circuit may indicate a sharper competitive edge this year.

Although Overbeck has played against slightly tougher opponents, Sweeny’s advantage in deciding sets shows he often delivers when the stakes are highest.

Considering these factors, Dane Sweeny seems to have a slight edge to emerge victorious in the pending match-up against Carl Emil Overbeck.

Dane Sweeny vs Carl Emil Overbeck Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

D. Sweeny vs C. E. Overbeck H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
2H2H Matches Won0
4Sets Won1
30Games Won17
9Aces (Total)20
4Total Double Faults6
1:57:47Average Match Time1:57:47
69% (105/152)1st Serve %67% (114/170)
74% (78/105)1st Serve Win %70% (80/114)
57% (27/47)2nd Serve Win %38% (21/56)
29% (6/21)Break Pts Won %0% (0/10)
41% (69/170)Return Points Win %31% (47/152)
100% (2/2)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/2)
100% (1/1)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Sweeny 52%, Overbeck 50%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Sweeny 56%, Overbeck 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Sweeny 61%, Overbeck 55%.

D. Sweeny Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardPlayford Challenger - 24-11-2025

F

AUSR. Hijikata
L
6-0 6-7(8) 6-4

SF

AUSJ. Duckworth
W
7-6(6) 5-7 7-6(5)

QF

AUSP. Sekulic
W
6-2 6-4

R2

JPNH. Shiraishi
W
6-2 6-4

R1

GBRF. Bass
W
3-6 6-1 6-3

C. E. Overbeck Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardPlayford Challenger - 24-11-2025

QF

AUSA. Bolt
L
7-6(5) 6-4

R2

AUSJ. Murray
W
6-3 3-1 ret.

R1

AUSM. Dellavedova
W
3-6 7-5 6-2

Q3

JPNM. Imamura
W
6-4 5-7 6-1

Q1

JPNN. Tajima
W
6-2 6-2
banner

D. Sweeny vs C. E. Overbeck Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
60.15% (243/161)YTD Win/Loss65.48% (55/29)
56.54% (532/409)Sets Win/Loss62.03% (116/71)
52.80% (4653/4160)Games Win/Loss55.25% (969/785)
63.83% (210/119)Hard Win/Loss74.19% (23/8)
43.59% (17/22)Clay Win/Loss60.42% (29/19)
36.84% (7/12)Indoor Hard W/L60.00% (3/2)
52.94% (9/8)Grass Win/Loss0% (0/0)
0.2Aces Per Game0.35
883Aces Total295
0.28Double Faults Per Game0.23
1207Total Double Faults199
1:39:59Average Match Time1:14:25
436.96Average Opponent Rank330.87
63% (16512/26263)1st Serve %64% (2722/4270)
66% (10930/16512)1st Serve Win %69% (1882/2722)
51% (4987/9751)2nd Serve Win %48% (737/1548)
43% (1232/2844)Break Points Won % (Total)44% (207/473)
41% (10858/26213)Return Points Win %42% (1813/4312)
46.67% (7/8)Slam W/L0% (0/0)
60.00% (3/2)Masters W/L0% (0/0)
42.86% (3/4)Main Tour W/L0% (0/0)
43.94% (58/74)Challenger W/L64.71% (11/6)
70.20% (172/73)Futures W/L65.67% (44/23)
60% (239/399)Best of 3 Sets Win %65% (55/84)
67% (2/3)Best of 5 Sets Win %0% (0/0)
49% (50/102)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)40% (6/15)
64% (84/131)Deciding Set Win %68% (13/19)
90% (211/189)1st Set Won, Won Match96% (48/46)
10% (211/22)1st Set Won, Lost Match4% (48/2)
28% (193/54)1st Set Lost, Won Match25% (36/9)