Dan Added vs Hazem Naow Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Added vs H. Naow

Dan Added
FRA
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
w
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
26
Age
25
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
210
C. Rank
842
204
Best Rank
299
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$37.2K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Hazem Naow
SYR
l
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
26
Age
25
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
-
210
C. Rank
842
204
Best Rank
299
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$37.2K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Added 2 - 0 Naow
They have played 5 sets in total, with Dan Added winning 4 and Hazem Naow winning 1. The last match between Dan Added and Hazem Naow was at the M25 Sarreguemines, 25-10-2023, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Dan Added getting the victory 6-1 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Added | 2 |
| Naow | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Sarreguemines(10-25-23)
Dan Added
6
7
Hazem Naow
1
6
(SF) M15 Forbach(10-02-21)
Dan Added
6
6
6
Hazem Naow
1
7
3
D. Added vs H. Naow H2H Profile
D. Added vs H. Naow Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Dan Added has won 44.26% of points on their second serve, while Hazem Naow has won 39.95%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Dan Added, in recent form, has won 44.99% of their opponent's second serve points, while Hazem Naow has won 53.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 22.67% and 31.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Dan Added has saved 54.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Hazem Naow has saved 46.27% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Dan Added has won 68.57% of matches played (W/L 72/33), with Hazem Naow winning 50.00% (W/L 8/8) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Dan Added has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 137/79), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/2). Hazem Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 79/37), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 62/45).
- Player level: In the last year, Dan Added has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75.38% of matches (W/L 49/16), where as Hazem Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 8/6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Dan Added winning 2 times and Hazem Naow being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Dan Added winning 4 and Hazem Naow winning 1.
- The last match between Dan Added and Hazem Naow was at the M25 Sarreguemines, 25-10-2023, Round: R1, Surface: Carpet, with Dan Added getting the victory 6-1 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:38:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Dan Added has played against opponents with an average rank of 377.92 while Hazem Naow has played against players with an average rank of 331.19.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Dan Added has won 74% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Hazem Naow has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Dan Added has converted 31.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Hazem Naow has converted 39.39% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Dan Added vs Hazem Naow Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Added vs H. Naow H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 31 | Games Won | 18 |
| 14 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
| 1:38:30 | Average Match Time | 1:38:30 |
| 62% (91/146) | 1st Serve % | 61% (89/147) |
| 82% (75/91) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (55/89) |
| 49% (27/55) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (25/58) |
| 69% (9/13) | Break Pts Won % | 44% (4/9) |
| 46% (67/147) | Return Points Win % | 30% (44/146) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Added 51%, Naow 40%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Added 51%, Naow 54%.
Break Points Saved %: Added 61%, Naow 53%.
D. Added Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SF | L | 1-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 7-6(4) 4-6 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 7-6(3) | ||
Q3 | L | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
H. Naow Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-6(0) 6-7(5) 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | L | 1-6 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | w/o | ||

D. Added vs H. Naow Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.44% (359/245) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.21% (177/103) |
| 57.58% (801/590) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.29% (391/247) |
| 52.79% (6943/6210) | Games Win/Loss | 54.38% (3211/2694) |
| 63.43% (137/79) | Hard Win/Loss | 68.10% (79/37) |
| 53.85% (77/66) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.94% (62/45) |
| 59.50% (144/98) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63.16% (36/21) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.43 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 2737 | Aces Total | 413 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.27 |
| 995 | Total Double Faults | 766 |
| 1:35:30 | Average Match Time | 1:23:42 |
| 499 | Average Opponent Rank | 414.94 |
| 59% (23004/39099) | 1st Serve % | 67% (10311/15435) |
| 71% (16286/23004) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (6679/10311) |
| 50% (8054/16094) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (2416/5124) |
| 43% (1651/3867) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (861/1881) |
| 40% (15749/39327) | Return Points Win % | 44% (6903/15713) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 25.00% (1/3) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 46.91% (76/86) | Challenger W/L | 50.85% (30/29) |
| 64.45% (281/155) | Futures W/L | 66.97% (146/72) |
| 59% (351/593) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (173/275) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 54% (105/195) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (33/64) |
| 53% (98/185) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (40/79) |
| 87% (356/311) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (171/153) |
| 13% (356/45) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (171/18) |
| 19% (247/47) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (109/24) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
11:10 PM 15/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Kaja Juvan vs Sahaja Yamalapalli Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group G – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Jannik Sinner vs Alex De Minaur Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Liam Broady vs Jan-Lennard Struff Prediction – ATP Lyon Challenger – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Nitto ATP Finals – Turin Preview And Prediction: Jannik Sinner vs Alex De Minaur Betting Tips & Picks November 15, 2025
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Zverev Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Shelton H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
16:25
H2H 12-0
22:30
H2H 4-3
H2H 0-0
17:45
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Lyon Challenger
France
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Criciuma
Brazil
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico