Dalma Galfi vs Oksana Selekhmeteva Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 May at 06:19 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Galfi vs O. Selekhmeteva

HUN
1
Win
Played
2
Win

RUS
1
Win
Played
2
Win
Head-to-head: Galfi 1 - 2 Selekhmeteva
They have played 8 sets in total, with Dalma Galfi winning 4 and Oksana Selekhmeteva winning 4. The last match between Dalma Galfi and Oksana Selekhmeteva was at the Catalonia Open - Vic, 02-05-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Dalma Galfi getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Galfi | 1 |
| Selekhmeteva | 2 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(SF) Catalonia Open - Vic(05-02-25)
(Q1) Australian Open - Melbourne(01-07-25)
(R2) Workday Canberra International - Canberra(01-01-25)
D. Galfi vs O. Selekhmeteva H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,285,612 | Career Prize Money | $448,763 |
| 57.99% (352-255) | Career Total W/L | 66.56% (205-103) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 0 | Hard | 2 |
| 11 | Titles | 5 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 45.45% (5-6) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-2) |
D. Galfi vs O. Selekhmeteva Match Preview:
When analyzing recent second serve performance, Galfi has secured 38.87% of points on her second serve in the last six months, slightly edging out Selekhmeteva, who has won 38.23%. Historically, this stat serves as a reliable indicator for match predictions.
Their return game statistics further illuminate their competitive standing. Recently, Galfi has been able to claim 51.34% of her opponent's second serve points, whereas Selekhmeteva closely follows with 51.12%. While assessing first serve return points, Selekhmeteva leads by clinching 32.61% compared to Galfi's 28.93%—a significant metric when determining the favored player in this head-to-head duel.
Evaluating their performance under pressure, Selekhmeteva demonstrates an advantage by saving 54.2% of breakpoints, outpacing Galfi’s 48.24%. Such figures are instrumental for strategic in-game betting.
Looking at their yearly performance overview, Galfi has achieved victory in 60.66% of her matches (W/L 37/24). In contrast, Selekhmeteva holds a marginally superior record, winning 65% of her matches (W/L 39/21), shaping an overall head-to-head prediction framework. Examining their best surfaces, Galfi excels on grass with a 64% win rate (W/L 23/13) and shows a weaker performance on indoor hard courts with a 46% win rate (W/L 31/37). Selekhmeteva finds her forte on clay, with a 68% win rate (W/L 99/47), while her indoor hard court stats reflect a 50% success rate (W/L 17/17).
Both players predominantly compete in Challengers/ITF tournaments above $10K. In the last year, Galfi has triumphed in 63.16% of such matches (W/L 24/14), whereas Selekhmeteva has a stronger record with a 69.77% win rate (W/L 30/13), emphasizing their relative success based on competition level.
In their direct head-to-head confrontations, Galfi has yet to secure a win against Selekhmeteva, who has claimed victory in both of their prior matches. Across the 6 sets played, Galfi won only 2, with Selekhmeteva winning 4. Their most recent encounter took place at the Australian Open, where Selekhmeteva seized a 6-4, 3-6, 6-4 victory.
The average match time in their duels extends to 2:4:44, with Selekhmeteva winning both past deciding sets against Galfi, an essential detail for projecting outcomes if the match extends to decisive moments. Despite never contesting a tiebreak against one another, both players' statistics suggest differing competencies under extreme pressure.
Regarding opponent caliber over the previous year, Galfi's matches have involved contenders with an average rank of 200.92, while Selekhmeteva faced players with a slightly higher average rank of 209.17. In deciding sets against all opponents within the past year, Galfi has prevailed in 53% of instances, while Selekhmeteva has achieved success in 67% of similar situations.
For in-match situations, recent breakpoint conversion rates reveal Galfi converting 33.14% of her opportunities and Selekhmeteva an improved 37.97%, an insightful metric for in-game betting.
Considering these various performance metrics and statistical patterns, Selekhmeteva holds a discernible edge heading into the match, suggesting a higher likelihood of victory based on historical data and recent form.
Dalma Galfi vs Oksana Selekhmeteva Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Galfi vs O. Selekhmeteva H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 40 | Games Won | 34 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 19 |
| 1:48:26 | Average Match Time | 1:48:26 |
| 65% (157/240) | 1st Serve % | 60% (134/223) |
| 68% (107/157) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (89/134) |
| 41% (34/83) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (36/89) |
| 58% (14/24) | Break Pts Won % | 48% (12/25) |
| 44% (98/223) | Return Points Win % | 41% (99/240) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (2/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
D. Galfi Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
Q1 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
O. Selekhmeteva Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F | W | 6-1 6-1 | ||
SF | W | 7-6(1) 6-2 | ||
QF | W | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||

D. Galfi vs O. Selekhmeteva Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.99% (352/255) | YTD Win/Loss | 66.56% (205/103) |
| 57.06% (792/596) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.82% (441/261) |
| 52.95% (6737/5987) | Games Win/Loss | 55.16% (3585/2914) |
| 61.50% (139/87) | Hard Win/Loss | 70.00% (63/27) |
| 57.43% (143/106) | Clay Win/Loss | 68.33% (123/57) |
| 48.89% (44/46) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (17/17) |
| 61.90% (26/16) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 1759 | Aces Total | 359 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 1598 | Total Double Faults | 1060 |
| 1:26:17 | Average Match Time | 1:34:28 |
| 442.25 | Average Opponent Rank | 368.17 |
| 62% (22914/36694) | 1st Serve % | 65% (12844/19656) |
| 65% (14838/22914) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (7842/12844) |
| 46% (6318/13780) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3142/6811) |
| 47% (2108/4452) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1339/2729) |
| 44% (16671/37558) | Return Points Win % | 48% (9627/20110) |
| 50.00% (26/26) | Slam W/L | 62.07% (18/11) |
| 50.00% (13/13) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 41.18% (7/10) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 44.59% (33/41) | Main Tour W/L | 51.85% (14/13) |
| 59.59% (233/158) | Challenger W/L | 69.37% (154/68) |
| 85.11% (40/7) | Futures W/L | 65.52% (19/10) |
| 59% (346/586) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (202/305) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 47% (69/147) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (27/62) |
| 53% (100/190) | Deciding Set Win % | 62% (54/87) |
| 86% (347/297) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (200/181) |
| 14% (347/49) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (200/19) |
| 22% (260/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 22% (108/24) |