Dali Blanch vs Alaa Trifi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 26 Oct at 07:53 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
D. Blanch vs A. Trifi

 USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 TUN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Blanch 1 - 0 Trifi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Dali Blanch winning 2 and Alaa Trifi winning 0. The last match between Dali Blanch and Alaa Trifi was at the Monastir Challenger, 26-10-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Dali Blanch getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Blanch | 1 | 
| Trifi | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Monastir Challenger(10-26-25)
D. Blanch vs A. Trifi H2H Profile
D. Blanch vs A. Trifi Match Preview:
- Looking at second serve effectiveness, Dali Blanch has a slight edge with 45.51% of points won compared to 39.83% by Alaa Trifi.
- When considering return games, Alaa Trifi outperforms Dali Blanch, especially on the opponents' second serve, winning 49.73% of those points versus Blanch's 46.50%.
- Does Alaa Trifi also fare better on first serve returns? Yes, Trifi wins 31.15% compared to Blanch's 29.10%.
- In terms of handling pressure, Trifi edges out with 52.91% of breakpoints saved, whereas Blanch saves 48.86%.
- Performance over the past year shows Blanch with 60.53% match wins, surpassing Trifi's 47.92%.
- Surface preference plays a role; Blanch's strength is on Clay with 57% wins, while Trifi excels on Hard courts with the same win percentage.
- Both players competed mostly in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, though Blanch achieved a better win rate at 56.82%, compared to Trifi’s 48.94%.
- In terms of opponent quality, Trifi faces stronger opponents, with an average rank of 244.65, compared to 418.2 for Blanch.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Trifi slightly leads, winning 50% of those compared to Blanch's 47%.
- Past performances at the current event could be definitive, favoring the more in-form player in the current context.
Editorial Prediction (October 26, 2025, UTC):
Dali Blanch demonstrates stronger performance in second serve situations, which is a promising indicator of overall match success. However, Alaa Trifi shows superior return game statistics, particularly against second serves, suggesting a potential advantage in countering Blanch's service games.
While Blanch saves breakpoints efficiently, Trifi showcases a marginally better capability under pressure. For match performance over the year, Blanch has a significant edge, achieving a higher overall match win percentage.
The playing surface might influence the outcome; Blanch thrives on Clay, but if this match is on a Hard court, Trifi could leverage his success on that surface. Moreover, Trifi’s matches against higher-ranked opponents may positively impact his resilience and skills under formidable competition.
Considering all these factors, Alaa Trifi seems slightly more poised to clinch the victory in this anticipated match, owing mainly to his competitive return game and ability to handle high-ranking adversaries.
Dali Blanch vs Alaa Trifi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
D. Blanch vs A. Trifi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 | 
| 12 | Games Won | 4 | 
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 0 | 
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 6 | 
| 1:4:0 | Average Match Time | 1:4:0 | 
| 47% (23/49) | 1st Serve % | 43% (19/44) | 
| 74% (17/23) | 1st Serve Win % | 37% (7/19) | 
| 54% (14/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 32% (8/25) | 
| 100% (6/6) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) | 
| 66% (29/44) | Return Points Win % | 37% (18/49) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
D. Blanch Recent Matches Played
A. Trifi Recent Matches Played

D. Blanch vs A. Trifi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 51.45% (142/134) | YTD Win/Loss | 43.28% (29/38) | 
| 52.38% (341/310) | Sets Win/Loss | 44.23% (69/87) | 
| 50.69% (3099/3015) | Games Win/Loss | 48.99% (730/760) | 
| 45.31% (58/70) | Hard Win/Loss | 46.03% (29/34) | 
| 57.14% (84/63) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/4) | 
| 0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0.37 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 | 
| 1093 | Aces Total | 78 | 
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 | 
| 733 | Total Double Faults | 228 | 
| 1:34:51 | Average Match Time | 1st Match | 
| 447.51 | Average Opponent Rank | 295.99 | 
| 58% (10059/17369) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1421/2435) | 
| 69% (6897/10059) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (884/1421) | 
| 49% (3590/7310) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (379/1014) | 
| 44% (767/1742) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (111/252) | 
| 40% (7067/17614) | Return Points Win % | 42% (969/2322) | 
| 56.67% (34/26) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/2) | 
| 50.00% (108/108) | Futures W/L | 44.62% (29/36) | 
| 51% (140/274) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 43% (29/67) | 
| 52% (30/58) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 
| 42% (42/101) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (11/22) | 
| 78% (156/121) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (27/21) | 
| 22% (156/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 22% (27/6) | 
| 18% (120/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (40/8) | 












