Cyril Vandermeersch vs Amine Jamji Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Oct at 11:55 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Vandermeersch vs A. Jamji

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

MAR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Vandermeersch 1 - 0 Jamji
They have played 2 sets in total, with Cyril Vandermeersch winning 2 and Amine Jamji winning 0. The last match between Cyril Vandermeersch and Amine Jamji was at the M15 Monastir, 30-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Cyril Vandermeersch getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Vandermeersch | 1 |
| Jamji | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Monastir(10-30-25)
C. Vandermeersch vs A. Jamji H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.85% (143-100) | Career Total W/L | 50.00% (15-15) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Vandermeersch vs A. Jamji Match Preview:
- Cyril Vandermeersch's recent second serve performance shows a stronger record, having won 41.02% of points compared to Amine Jamji's 35.15%.
- In return games, Amine Jamji leads slightly in winning opponent's second serve points at 51.25%, whereas Cyril Vandermeersch has 45.85%.
- The players are closely matched in their ability to return first serves, with Jamji holding a minor edge at 30.53% compared to Vandermeersch's 29.21%.
- Under pressure, Jamji has a slight advantage in saving breakpoints at 54.69% compared to Vandermeersch's 53.79%.
- Overall performance in the past year shows Vandermeersch winning 62.16% of his matches, slightly outperforming Jamji's 60.00%.
- Both players excel on Hard courts, each with a 62% win rate, but differ on Clay, where Vandermeersch has little experience and Jamji holds a 50% win rate.
- Both players have participated largely in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, with Jamji having a marginally higher win percentage within these events.
- Vandermeersch has faced lower-ranked opponents on average, with their average rank being 404.88, compared to Jamji's opponents at an average rank of 217.6.
- Should the match extend to a deciding set, Jamji holds the upper hand by having won all deciding sets in the past year, unlike Vandermeersch's 56% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (October 30, 2025, UTC):
Cyril Vandermeersch's recent second serve prowess might give him a critical edge in keeping his service games intact against Amine Jamji.
However, Jamji's superior return game stats could counteract this advantage, especially given his ability to win a higher percentage of opponent's second serve points.
Considering past performance under pressure, both players are nearly equal in breakpoint saving, yet Jamji has consistently performed well in deciding sets.
While both excel on Hard courts, Jamji's exposure to higher-ranked opponents might better prepare him for challenging matches.
Given these factors, Amine Jamji appears to be slightly more favored to win this upcoming match.
Cyril Vandermeersch vs Amine Jamji Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Vandermeersch vs A. Jamji H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 2 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:4:15 | Average Match Time | 1:4:15 |
| 58% (22/38) | 1st Serve % | 61% (27/44) |
| 86% (19/22) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (15/27) |
| 63% (10/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (5/17) |
| 83% (5/6) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 55% (24/44) | Return Points Win % | 24% (9/38) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Vandermeersch Recent Matches Played
A. Jamji Recent Matches Played

C. Vandermeersch vs A. Jamji Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.85% (143/100) | YTD Win/Loss | 50.00% (15/15) |
| 56.66% (319/244) | Sets Win/Loss | 45.45% (30/36) |
| 53.05% (2874/2544) | Games Win/Loss | 47.76% (277/303) |
| 62.13% (105/64) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (4/4) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (11/11) |
| 52.05% (38/35) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 594 | Aces Total | 13 |
| 0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 750 | Total Double Faults | 15 |
| 1:30:19 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 435.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 155.53 |
| 57% (7912/13903) | 1st Serve % | 66% (429/654) |
| 69% (5450/7912) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (257/429) |
| 50% (2976/5991) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (86/225) |
| 44% (645/1452) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (20/50) |
| 42% (5676/13659) | Return Points Win % | 39% (230/596) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 28.57% (4/10) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.70% (139/90) | Futures W/L | 51.72% (15/14) |
| 59% (141/241) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (15/30) |
| 42% (25/60) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (2/4) |
| 56% (44/79) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (6/6) |
| 86% (139/120) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (13/13) |
| 13% (139/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (13/0) |
| 21% (104/22) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (17/2) |