Prediction of Craig Campbell vs Tom Mercer Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Campbell vs T. Mercer

Craig Campbell

RSA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

183

Best Rank

303

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Tom Mercer

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

183

Best Rank

303

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Campbell 1 - 0 Mercer

They have played 2 sets in total, with Craig Campbell winning 2 and Tom Mercer winning 0. The last match between Craig Campbell and Tom Mercer was at the Chicoutimi CH, 17-07-1989, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Craig Campbell getting the victory 7-5 7-5.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Campbell	1
Mercer	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R3) Chicoutimi CH(07-17-89)

Stats

Craig Campbell

Tom Mercer

C. Campbell vs T. Mercer H2H Profile

C. Campbell	Stats	T. Mercer
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
35.00% (28-52)	Career Total W/L	41.67% (10-14)
1	Clay	0
0	Titles	1
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Campbell vs T. Mercer Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Craig Campbell has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Tom Mercer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Craig Campbell, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tom Mercer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Craig Campbell has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tom Mercer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Craig Campbell has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Tom Mercer winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Craig Campbell has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 17/25), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/1). Tom Mercer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/7), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 0% (W/L 0/5).
Player level: In the last year, Craig Campbell has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Tom Mercer has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Craig Campbell winning 1 times and Tom Mercer being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Craig Campbell winning 2 and Tom Mercer winning 0.
The last match between Craig Campbell and Tom Mercer was at the Chicoutimi CH, 17-07-1989, Round: R3, Surface: Clay, with Craig Campbell getting the victory 7-5 7-5.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Craig Campbell has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Tom Mercer has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Craig Campbell has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tom Mercer has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Craig Campbell has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tom Mercer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Craig Campbell vs Tom Mercer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Campbell vs T. Mercer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Campbell	Stats	T. Mercer
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
14	Games Won	10
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Campbell Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Kiawah Island - 07-05-1990
R2 David WheatonD. Wheaton	L	1-6 6-3 7-5	Stats
R1 Bryan SheltonB. Shelton	W	6-0 6-3	Stats
Capetown CH - 06-11-1989
R3 Ugo ColombiniU. Colombini	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Johannesburg CH - 23-10-1989
R3 Marius BarnardM. Barnard	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
Coquitlam CH - 02-10-1989
R3 Ned CaswellN. Caswell	L	6-7 6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

T. Mercer Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Tokyo - 05-04-1993
R1 Kenneth CarlsenK. Carlsen	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Indianapolis - 17-08-1992
R1 Stephane SansoniS. Sansoni	L	3-6 6-1 6-1	Stats
Newport - 08-07-1991
R1 Javier FranaJ. Frana	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
Kiawah Island - 07-05-1990
R1 Richey RenebergR. Reneberg	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
Winnetka CH - 14-08-1989
QF Robbie WeissR. Weiss	L	6-4 6-2	Stats

View All

C. Campbell vs T. Mercer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Campbell	Stats	T. Mercer
35.00% (28/52)	YTD Win/Loss	41.67% (10/14)
39.09% (77/120)	Sets Win/Loss	43.10% (25/33)
45.86% (847/1000)	Games Win/Loss	47.20% (253/283)
30.56% (11/25)	Hard Win/Loss	53.33% (8/7)
40.48% (17/25)	Clay Win/Loss	0.00% (0/5)
0.00% (0/1)	Indoor Hard W/L	66.67% (2/1)
0.00% (0/1)	Grass Win/Loss	0.00% (0/1)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
536.41	Average Opponent Rank	336.71
0.00% (0/2)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/1)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
38.89% (7/11)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/5)
35.59% (21/38)	Challenger W/L	55.56% (10/8)
36% (27/76)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	45% (10/22)
0% (0/2)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/2)
45% (15/33)	Deciding Set Win %	57% (4/7)
71% (35/25)	1st Set Won, Won Match	67% (9/6)
29% (35/10)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	33% (9/3)
9% (45/4)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	27% (15/4)