Cori Gauff vs Magdalena Frech Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 Aug at 05:45 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Gauff vs M. Frech

USA
3
Win
Played
0
Win

POL
3
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Gauff 3 - 0 Frech
They have played 6 sets in total, with Cori Gauff winning 6 and Magdalena Frech winning 0. The last match between Cori Gauff and Magdalena Frech was at the U.S. Open - New York, 30-08-2025, Round: R3, Surface: Hard, with Cori Gauff getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Gauff | 3 |
Frech | 0 |
Last H2H Matches:
(R3) U.S. Open - New York(08-30-25)
(R2) Internazionali BNL d'Italia - Rome(05-09-24)
(R4) Australian Open - Melbourne(01-21-24)
C. Gauff vs M. Frech H2H Profile
C. Gauff vs M. Frech Match Preview:
- In recent months, Frech has been slightly ahead in second serve performance, winning 39.76% of points compared to Gauff's 37.08%. Can this be a decisive factor? It's important, but not overwhelmingly so.
- On return games, Gauff outperforms Frech, capturing 53.29% of second serve points compared to 49.28% for Frech. This gives Gauff an edge in countering serve returns.
- Analyzing first serve returns, Gauff again leads with a 32.48% success rate, while Frech has 31.24%. Could this reflect Gauff's ability to handle pressure better?
- Under pressure, Frech has saved 47.6% of breakpoints, slightly better than Gauff's 45.19%. A small advantage, but potentially crucial in tight matches.
- Performance over the past year strongly favors Gauff, who boasts a 76.92% win rate compared to Frech's 46.81%. Does this experience give Gauff a clear advantage?
- Both players excel on clay, but Gauff's 73% win rate is notably higher than Frech's 59%. Will this surface preference play a critical role?
- Gauff has been competing regularly in higher-level Masters series events, with a significant win ratio of 75.61%, while Frech has been active on the main tour with a 45% success rate.
- In direct encounters, Gauff leads head-to-head with two wins, having won all four sets they've played. What does this record indicate?
- Gauff has faced tougher competition, with opponents ranked an average of 40.29, compared to Frech's 77.26. Might this reflect Gauff's superior match readiness?
- Should the match extend to a deciding set, Gauff has the upper hand, winning 78% compared to Frech's 50% in such situations.
- Gauff is also more effective in converting breakpoints, with a success rate of 47.74% against Frech's 37.66%. Does this imply better seizing of opportunities?
Editorial Prediction (August 30, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match promises to be an intriguing contest between Frech and Gauff. Frech has shown some advantage in second serve points, but Gauff counters with superior return game statistics.
Gauff's higher win rate, particularly in head-to-head clashes and deciding set scenarios, suggests she handles high-pressure situations effectively. Her notable success against top-tier opponents reinforces this edge.
Additionally, Gauff's strong performance on clay aligns well with the surface advantages, tipping the scales in her favor for this match.
Combined with a history of success in previous encounters with Frech, Gauff is the likely favorite to emerge victorious in this matchup.
Cori Gauff vs Magdalena Frech Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Gauff vs M. Frech H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
6 | Sets Won | 0 |
36 | Games Won | 13 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
14 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:14:48 | Average Match Time | 1:14:48 |
61% (83/137) | 1st Serve % | 66% (97/147) |
72% (60/83) | 1st Serve Win % | 41% (40/97) |
50% (27/54) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (19/50) |
55% (17/31) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (5/10) |
60% (88/147) | Return Points Win % | 36% (50/137) |
100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Gauff Recent Matches Played
M. Frech Recent Matches Played

C. Gauff vs M. Frech Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
70.68% (270/112) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.22% (446/320) |
65.70% (569/297) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.05% (1005/788) |
56.03% (4479/3515) | Games Win/Loss | 52.78% (8724/7806) |
70.18% (153/65) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.80% (167/127) |
73.15% (79/29) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.07% (166/115) |
70.00% (14/6) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.66% (74/48) |
66.67% (24/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 56.52% (39/30) |
0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
1356 | Aces Total | 1369 |
0.52 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
2048 | Total Double Faults | 1458 |
1:34:26 | Average Match Time | 1:21:10 |
194.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 417.57 |
61% (15553/25606) | 1st Serve % | 62% (26570/42843) |
68% (10622/15553) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (16734/26570) |
44% (4469/10047) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (7476/16273) |
49% (1563/3204) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (2480/5345) |
46% (11753/25599) | Return Points Win % | 45% (19284/42556) |
75.73% (78/25) | Slam W/L | 46.30% (25/29) |
67.12% (98/48) | Masters W/L | 52.27% (46/42) |
50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 50.00% (7/7) |
73.00% (73/27) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (97/97) |
64.52% (20/11) | Challenger W/L | 65.50% (224/118) |
0% (0/0) | Futures W/L | 63.51% (47/27) |
70% (264/376) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (436/756) |
100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (4/4) |
62% (55/89) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (71/152) |
67% (70/105) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (144/264) |
92% (249/229) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (407/358) |
8% (249/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (407/48) |
29% (133/39) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (359/87) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Gauff (China Open - Beijing)
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
