Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Constantin Schmitz vs Maxime Chazal Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Schmitz vs Chazal analysis and find out who is favored!
Constantin Schmitz vs Maxime Chazal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Schmitz has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Chazal has won 44.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Schmitz, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Chazal has won 50.94%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 36.1% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Schmitz has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chazal has saved 63.12% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Schmitz has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Chazal winning 57.41% (W/L 31/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Schmitz has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 18/ 12). Chazal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 406/ 239), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 6/ 12).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Schmitz winning 1 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Schmitz winning 2 and Chazal winning 3. The last match between Schmitz and Chazal was at the M15 Porec, 16-03-2019, Semifinals, Clay with Maxime Chazal getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:9:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Schmitz and Chazal have played a deciding set 1 times, with Schmitz winning 1 times and Chazal 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Schmitz winning 0, and Chazal 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Schmitz has played against opponents with an average rank of while Chazal has played against players with an average rank of 205.61.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Schmitz has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chazal has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Schmitz has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chazal has converted 51.49% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Schmitz 1 - 1 Chazal
Ret.
Rank
552
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
468
Rank
234
High
31
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
65% (79-43)
Career Total W/L
60% (442-290)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
53% (8-7)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,860
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Constantin Schmitz | Maxime Chazal |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 3 |
| Games Won | 21 | 24 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:9:30 | 2:9:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (85/137) | 78% (142/182) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (50/85) | 56% (80/142) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 38% (20/52) | 40% (16/40) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (9/29) | 77% (10/13) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (86/182) | 49% (67/137) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Maxime Chazal
Player
Constantin Schmitz
72%
(
59 of
82)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
15)
40%
(
33 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
29 of
58)
78
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 3-6 6-2 6-4 |
Stats
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Maxime Chazal
61%
(
48 of
79)
1st Serve %
83%
(
83 of
100)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
4
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
35%
(
11 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
48%
(
38 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
53 of
100)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Constantin Schmitz | Maxime Chazal |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 53% (8/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (19/15) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (168/157) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (8/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 27 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 38 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 2:1:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 105.6 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 63% (691/1096) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (466/691) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (181/405) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 52% (52/100) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (421/997) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (8/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/14) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 70% (10/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 30% (10/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 20% (5/1) |
Constantin Schmitz Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mick Veldheer
Player
Constantin Schmitz
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Constantin Schmitz
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Mats Rosenkranz
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
44%
(
23 of
52)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
7 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luke Johnson
Player
Constantin Schmitz
69%
(
61 of
88)
1st Serve %
70%
(
60 of
86)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
37 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Zachary Eisinga
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Constantin Schmitz
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
44%
(
15 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
100
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Dayne Kelly
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
69%
(
29 of
42)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Constantin Schmitz
Player
Jannik Rother
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tom Kocevar-Desman
Player
Constantin Schmitz
54%
(
49 of
90)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
101)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
8
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
41 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
49 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Sergeyev
Player
Constantin Schmitz
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
79 of
113)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
12
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
8 of
34)
33%
(
8 of
24)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
44%
(
43 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
59 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Maxime Chazal Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Neil Oberleitner
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Milos Karol
82%
(
51 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
0
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Pietro Marino
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
34 of
47)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
18 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Michael Gloeckler
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
2
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
90%
(
43 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
25 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Maxence Bertimon
65%
(
68 of
105)
1st Serve %
62%
(
65 of
105)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
41 of
65)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
39%
(
41 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
105)
112
Total Points Won
98
|
6-4 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julio Cesar Porras
Player
Maxime Chazal
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ignacio Buse
Player
Maxime Chazal
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
75)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
28%
(
5 of
18)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
38 of
75)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Alcala Gurri
Player
Maxime Chazal
72%
(
62 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
6
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
48%
(
41 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Chazal
Player
Corentin Denolly
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
44%
(
21 of
48)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Maxime Chazal
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
14 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-6(1) ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Schmitz Vs Chazal Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Maxime Chazal
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
