Constant Lestienne vs Brandon Holt Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Apr at 05:46 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Lestienne vs B. Holt

FRA
1
Win
Played
1
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Lestienne 1 - 1 Holt
They have played 6 sets in total, with Constant Lestienne winning 3 and Brandon Holt winning 3. The last match between Brandon Holt and Constant Lestienne was at the Busan Challenger, 15-04-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 1-6 7-6(2) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lestienne | 1 |
| Holt | 1 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Busan Challenger(04-15-25)
(R1) San Diego Open - San Diego(09-19-22)
C. Lestienne vs B. Holt H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $758,230 | Career Prize Money | $525,310 |
| 56.90% (466-353) | Career Total W/L | 60.27% (223-147) |
| 1 | Hard | 1 |
| 14 | Titles | 10 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 11.11% (1-8) |
C. Lestienne vs B. Holt Match Preview:
When evaluating the crucial aspect of the second serve performance, how do Holt and Lestienne stack up in recent form? Over the past six months, Holt has secured 45.03% of points on their second serve, surpassing Lestienne who has captured 42.86%. This statistic, intricately linked to match prediction precision, provides an insightful look into each player's service capabilities.
But what happens when their opponents hold the second serve? Holt clinches a noteworthy 44.78% of the points, whereas Lestienne snatches an impressive 48.24%. This paints Lestienne as slightly more aggressive in return games, a sentiment echoed in their first serve return rates, sitting at 28.69% compared to Holt’s 27.13%. These metrics are often vital for decoding player dominance in head-to-head matches.
The pressure of pivotal moments can define a match. How resilient are they when breakpoints are on the line? Holt showcases a breakpoint defense success of 52.98%, compared to Lestienne’s 50.96%. This factor emerges as a critical variable for in-game betting aficionados eyeing live match dynamics. Furthermore, examining match-win percentages over the last year, Holt enjoys a positive 60.26% win rate (47 wins, 31 losses), outperforming Lestienne's 50.79% (32 wins, 31 losses), laying the foundation for a robust comparative overview.
Surface preferences play a pivotal role in tennis, so what does the historical performance reveal about Holt and Lestienne? Both players have their strongest career win percentages on hard courts, with Holt at 64% (176 wins, 101 losses) and Lestienne closely matching at 63% (105 wins, 63 losses). However, grass surfaces tell a different tale with Holt winning 33% (1 win, 2 losses) and Lestienne at 39% (11 wins, 17 losses). It clearly outlines the geographical dynamics in competition outcomes.
Delving into Challenger/ITF tournaments over the past year, Holt has excelled, winning 62.5% of matches (40 wins, 24 losses), slightly edging Lestienne’s 57.14% win rate (24 wins, 18 losses) at similar event levels. These figures underscore the relative tournament experience influencing their readiness at crucial matches.
Head-to-head history anchors our analysis. In their sole encounter, Lestienne triumphed at the San Diego Open with a 5-7, 7-6(5), 6-3 scoreline over three sets, capturing two to Holt's one. This skirmish, lasting on average 2:42:44, indicates competitive tenacity. Remarkably, Lestienne also snagged the only tiebreak they contested, augmenting their pressure play insight. Additionally, when facing better-ranked opponents, Holt typically contends against a ranking average of 230.69, potentially offering him richer competitive exposure than Lestienne's 283.4.
In thrilling deciding sets, Holt emerges as the form favorite, winning 58% over the past 12 months against Lestienne's 50%. This statistic heavily factors into live prediction scenarios when the match teeters on a knife-edge. Moreover, Holt’s recent breakpoint conversion stands at 28.7%, contrasted by Lestienne’s higher 33.33%. Seizing these opportunities translates to tangible advantages during high-tension match plays.
Aligning these strategic insights, Holt's slight edges in second serve performance, match win percentage, and deciding set acumen may well culminate in a favorable edge. However, Lestienne's resilience under return games and historical head-to-head superiority underscores an intriguing contest on the horizon. Evaluating all dimensions, the statistical silhouette inclines towards Holt for capturing victory in this riveting showdown.
Constant Lestienne vs Brandon Holt Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Lestienne vs B. Holt H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 34 | Games Won | 30 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 22 |
| 10 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:31:3 | Average Match Time | 2:31:3 |
| 50% (108/217) | 1st Serve % | 63% (122/193) |
| 74% (80/108) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (88/122) |
| 51% (56/109) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (34/71) |
| 41% (7/17) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (6/15) |
| 37% (71/193) | Return Points Win % | 37% (81/217) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Lestienne Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-2 4-6 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 7-5 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 7-6(6) | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 1-6 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
B. Holt Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 3-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 4-3 ret. | ||
QF | L | 6-0 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 3-6 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 4-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | ||

C. Lestienne vs B. Holt Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.90% (466/353) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.27% (223/147) |
| 55.27% (1069/865) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.11% (505/364) |
| 52.24% (9589/8768) | Games Win/Loss | 53.18% (4384/3860) |
| 61.27% (106/67) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.75% (187/111) |
| 52.96% (161/143) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.44% (8/10) |
| 60.26% (188/124) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.63% (20/18) |
| 36.67% (11/19) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (8/8) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.39 |
| 2516 | Aces Total | 1561 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.1 |
| 2171 | Total Double Faults | 387 |
| 1:14:30 | Average Match Time | 1:36:20 |
| 521.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 401.65 |
| 59% (26769/45393) | 1st Serve % | 65% (15948/24566) |
| 69% (18554/26769) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (10913/15948) |
| 48% (8985/18624) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (4406/8618) |
| 44% (2055/4708) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1064/2470) |
| 41% (18436/44887) | Return Points Win % | 40% (10082/25104) |
| 31.91% (15/32) | Slam W/L | 50.00% (10/10) |
| 30.77% (4/9) | Masters W/L | 30.77% (4/9) |
| 48.00% (48/52) | Main Tour W/L | 46.88% (15/17) |
| 58.77% (238/167) | Challenger W/L | 55.31% (99/80) |
| 63.39% (161/93) | Futures W/L | 75.40% (95/31) |
| 57% (452/787) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (218/357) |
| 29% (5/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (4/8) |
| 51% (125/244) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (69/127) |
| 52% (151/289) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (66/122) |
| 85% (449/381) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (210/183) |
| 15% (449/67) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (210/26) |
| 22% (370/83) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (160/39) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Argentina Open – Buenos Aires Preview And Prediction: Varvara Lepchenko vs Panna Udvardy Betting Tips & Picks November 30, 2025

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Varvara Lepchenko Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

James Duckworth vs Dane Sweeny Prediction – ATP Playford Challenger – 29th November 2025 Best Bets

Mayar Sherif vs Caroline Dolehide Prediction – WTA Argentina Open – 28th November 2025 Best Bets
