Connor Thomson vs Yanki Erel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do Connor Thomson and Yanki Erel compare in second serve performance? Connor edges slightly with 44.19% compared to Thomson's 43.99%, yet both players exhibit similar efficiency in this department.
• What are the differences in return game effectiveness? Thomson possesses an advantage, winning 46.36% of opponent's second serve points compared to Erel's 42.18%.
• In terms of first serve return points, Erel outperforms Thomson, capturing 28.98% versus 25.40%.
• How does each player handle pressure situations? Under pressure, Thomson shows higher resilience by saving 52.43% of breakpoints compared to Erel’s 50.67%.
• Assessing past results, Erel maintains a formidable winning percentage over the past year, securing 71.64% of matches, while Thomson has won 46.67%.
• Examining performance on various surfaces, Thomson excels on grass with a 60% win rate, whereas Erel thrives on indoor hard courts with the same win percentage.
• In terms of competition level, Erel demonstrates superiority with a 71.43% win rate in $10K tournaments, surpassing Thomson’s 54.55%.
• Regarding opponent quality, Thomson has faced higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 314.8 compared to Erel's 424.93.
• Why might Erel be favored if a match reaches a deciding set? Erel has a stronger record, with a 59% success rate in deciding sets, relative to Thomson’s 40%.

Editorial Prediction (October 14, 2025, UTC):

In evaluating the performance patterns between Connor Thomson and Yanki Erel, several aspects favor Erel. Thomson demonstrates a slight edge in second serve return games and handles pressure well, which gives him a competitive edge in crucial points. However, Erel’s consistency in winning a higher percentage of first serve return points further solidifies his strong baseline performance.

Interestingly, Erel's remarkable level of play in the past year with a handsome 71.64% win rate showcases his consistency against lower-ranked opponents. This experience may provide additional strategic insights that Thomson might struggle against. However, Thomson's exposure to higher-quality opponents might play to his advantage in adapting to challenging scenarios.

Considering surface expertise, both players have respective surface strengths, but given the location and surface of the current event, this might prove negligible. The deciding set performance further positions Erel as a formidable opponent with a higher resilience rate based on past play.

Given both player's recent stats and career trends, the evidence suggests Yanki Erel is most likely to win the upcoming tennis match.