Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Connie Ma vs Anna Sinclair Rogers Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ma vs Rogers analysis and find out who is favored!
Connie Ma vs Anna Sinclair Rogers Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ma has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Rogers has won 42.3%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ma, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Rogers has won 53.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 38.16% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ma has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Rogers has saved 50.87% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ma has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Rogers winning 46.51% (W/L 20/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ma has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 5/ 2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 18/ 8). Rogers has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 42/ 29), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 39% (W/L 16/ 25).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ma winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Ma winning 2 and Rogers winning 1. The last match between Ma and Rogers was at the W15 Orlando, 18-06-2019, First, Clay with Connie Ma getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ma and Rogers have played a deciding set 1 times, with Ma winning 1 times and Rogers 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ma winning 0, and Rogers 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ma has played against opponents with an average rank of while Rogers has played against players with an average rank of 267.19.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ma has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Rogers has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ma has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Rogers has converted 46.46% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ma 1 - 0 Rogers
Ret.
Rank
633
High
20
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
644
Rank
537
High
26
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
70% (23-10)
Career Total W/L
52% (67-61)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (10-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Connie Ma | Anna Sinclair Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:12:0 | 2:12:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (52/84) | 65% (52/80) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (38/52) | 63% (33/52) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (16/32) | 43% (12/28) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 20% (2/10) |
| Return Points W% | 44% (35/80) | 36% (30/84) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Connie Ma
Player
Anna Sinclair Rogers
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Connie Ma | Anna Sinclair Rogers |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (10/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (25/27) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (246/249) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (7/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 51 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 72 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:54:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 287.65 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (1070/1636) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (702/1070) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (238/566) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 44% (78/176) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (678/1596) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (10/10) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (9/18) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (6/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (14/7) |
Connie Ma Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Catherine Harrison
Player
Connie Ma
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
84)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
36 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
84)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connie Ma
Player
Haruka Kaji
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Deniz Khazaniuk
Player
Connie Ma
78%
(
58 of
74)
1st Serve %
69%
(
37 of
54)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
31%
(
5 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
46%
(
34 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connie Ma
Player
Arianne Hartono
68%
(
66 of
97)
1st Serve %
53%
(
46 of
86)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
9
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
47%
(
46 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
86)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Madison Brengle
Player
Connie Ma
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Connie Ma
Player
Xiaodi You
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
70)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
28 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
28 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Connie Ma
Player
Chanelle Van Nguyen
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
61%
(
22 of
36)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
19 of
32)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karina Miller
Player
Connie Ma
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
36%
(
14 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
49
Total Points Won
33
|
6-4 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Connie Ma
Player
Alana Smith
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
51
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Connie Ma
Player
Anna Sinclair Rogers
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Anna Sinclair Rogers Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Mina Hodzic
Player
Anna Sinclair Rogers
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve %
55%
(
12 of
22)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
10 of
12)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
2 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
26
Total Points Won
11
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Mihaela Djakovic
61%
(
59 of
96)
1st Serve %
78%
(
52 of
67)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
41%
(
15 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
46%
(
44 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
84
Total Points Won
79
|
2-6 6-4 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Anna Sinclair Rogers
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
18 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Viola Hajna Jeck
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ana Konjuh
Player
Anna Sinclair Rogers
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
72%
(
79 of
110)
9
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
84%
(
48 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
57 of
79)
35%
(
13 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
35%
(
33 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
40 of
110)
101
Total Points Won
103
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Denise Hrdinkova
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Valeria Savinykh
Player
Anna Sinclair Rogers
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
0
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
29 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Tatiana Prozorova
66%
(
57 of
86)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
39 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anna Sinclair Rogers
Player
Amina Anshba
63%
(
73 of
115)
1st Serve %
79%
(
95 of
120)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
0
67%
(
49 of
73)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
56 of
95)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
49 of
120)
122
Total Points Won
113
|
6-2 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Weronika Falkowska
Player
Anna Sinclair Rogers
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
54%
(
21 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
38 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
view more
Ma Vs Rogers Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
