Prediction of Cliff Richey vs Pierre Barthes Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Richey vs P. Barthes

Cliff Richey
USA
l
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
6
Win
8
Played
2
Win
78
Age
84
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
16
Best Rank
57
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Pierre Barthes
FRA
w
w
l
l
l
l
l
w
w
l
6
Win
8
Played
2
Win
78
Age
84
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
16
Best Rank
57
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Richey 6 - 2 Barthes
They have played 20 sets in total, with Cliff Richey winning 15 and Pierre Barthes winning 5. The last match between Cliff Richey and Pierre Barthes was at the Masters, 04-12-1971, Round: Robin, Surface: Carpet, with Cliff Richey getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Richey | 6 |
| Barthes | 2 |
Last 8 H2H Matches:
(Robin) Masters(12-04-71)
Cliff Richey
6
6
Pierre Barthes
3
3
(R3) Paris Indoor(11-08-71)
Cliff Richey
6
6
Pierre Barthes
3
2
(R4) Wembley(11-16-70)
Cliff Richey
7
8
Pierre Barthes
5
6
C. Richey vs P. Barthes H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 68.58% (489-224) | Career Total W/L | 49.48% (189-193) |
| 2 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Grass | 2 |
| 3 | Indoor | 0 |
| 23 | Titles | 0 |
| 6 | Total H2H Matches | 2 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Richey vs P. Barthes Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cliff Richey has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Pierre Barthes has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cliff Richey, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pierre Barthes has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Cliff Richey has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pierre Barthes has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Cliff Richey has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Pierre Barthes winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Cliff Richey has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 72% (W/L 156/62), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 63% (W/L 24/14). Pierre Barthes has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 72% (W/L 12/6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 42% (W/L 30/41).
- Player level: In the last year, Cliff Richey has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Pierre Barthes has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 8 times before with Cliff Richey winning 6 times and Pierre Barthes being victorious 2 times. They have played 20 sets in total, with Cliff Richey winning 15 and Pierre Barthes winning 5.
- The last match between Cliff Richey and Pierre Barthes was at the Masters, 04-12-1971, Round: Robin, Surface: Carpet, with Cliff Richey getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cliff Richey has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Pierre Barthes has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cliff Richey has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pierre Barthes has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Cliff Richey has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pierre Barthes has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Cliff Richey vs Pierre Barthes Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Richey vs P. Barthes H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 6 | H2H Matches Won | 2 |
| 15 | Sets Won | 5 |
| 119 | Games Won | 88 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 67% (4/6) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (5/5) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (1/3) |
| 33% (1/3) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/5) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Richey 0%, Barthes 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Richey 0%, Barthes 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Richey 0%, Barthes 0%.
C. Richey Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R3 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
R3 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | ||
QF | L | 4-6 7-6 6-1 | ||
P. Barthes Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R4 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R3 | W | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | ||
R3 | L | 1-6 6-3 6-1 | ||
R3 | L | 7-6 6-3 | ||

C. Richey vs P. Barthes Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 68.58% (489/224) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.48% (189/193) |
| 64.64% (1172/641) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.90% (482/484) |
| 55.45% (9656/7757) | Games Win/Loss | 48.91% (6442/6729) |
| 71.55% (166/66) | Hard Win/Loss | 42.25% (30/41) |
| 71.56% (156/62) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.15% (75/61) |
| 60.93% (92/59) | Indoor Hard W/L | 41.49% (39/55) |
| 68.92% (51/23) | Grass Win/Loss | 52.38% (33/30) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 472.54 | Average Opponent Rank | 474.15 |
| 69.23% (45/20) | Slam W/L | 56.82% (25/19) |
| 71.79% (28/11) | Masters W/L | 44.44% (8/10) |
| 100.00% (2/0) | Cups W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 68.20% (414/193) | Main Tour W/L | 48.56% (152/161) |
| 68% (386/565) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (130/260) |
| 72% (98/137) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 52% (45/87) |
| 42% (16/38) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 58% (119/204) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (63/113) |
| 88% (482/423) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (186/150) |
| 12% (482/59) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (186/35) |
| 27% (223/61) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (188/35) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
08:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction04:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction04:50 PM 16/11/25
Prediction08:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction07:10 PM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
16 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
20:00
H2H 10-5
18:45
H2H 1-0
17:05
H2H 0-0
18:20
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Azul
Argentina
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Orlando
United States
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Columbus
United States
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal