Prediction of Clement Chidekh [291st] vs Dan Added [407th] Head-to-Head At The
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L L W L W L W L
Form
W W W W W W W W W WH2H: Chidekh 2 - 1 Added
They have played 7 sets in total, with Chidekh winning 5 and Added winning 2. The last match between Chidekh and Added was at the M25 Saint-Dizier, 27-03-2025, Second, I.hard with Dan Added getting the victory 6-2 3-6 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Clement Chidekh | 2 |
| Dan Added | 1 |
| Chidekh | Stats | Added |
|---|---|---|
| 38% (8-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 75% (24-8) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 291 | Ranking | 407 |
| 184 | Highest Rank | 240 |
| 23 | Age | 26 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 10 | Titles | 10 |
| 66% (155-81) | Career Total W/L | 59% (313-221) |
| $13,980 | Career Prize Money | $34,000 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 2 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 2 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-2 |
Stats 
Dan Added
Player
Clement Chidekh
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
48
Total Points Won
40
|
||||
| 7-6(5) 7-5 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Dan Added
74%
(
64 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
49 of
72)
5
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
82
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Dan Added
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
1
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
3 of
21)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
71
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 5 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 36 | Games Won | 28 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 24 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:24:22 | Average Match Time | 1:24:22 |
| 68% (132/193) | 1st Serve % | 67% (114/170) |
| 70% (93/132) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (76/114) |
| 43% (26/61) | 2nd Serve Win % | 36% (20/56) |
| 50% (10/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 28% (5/18) |
| 44% (74/170) | Return Points Win % | 38% (74/193) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Clement Chidekh vs Dan Added Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chidekh 2 - 1 Added
Editorial Prediction:
In analyzing the upcoming tennis match between Chidekh and Added, several stats offer insights into predicting the likely winner. When examining second serve performance over the last six months, Added has a slight edge, winning 47.97% of points, compared to Chidekh's 46.33%. This stat closely correlates with match prediction accuracy, providing a nuanced perspective on their competitive level.
Return game stats are also significant in this analysis. Chidekh has managed to win 48.85% of their opponent's second serve points recently, while Added follows closely with 47.01%. For first serve returns, Added marginally leads with 25.71% compared to Chidekh's 25.4%. These statistics are essential in forecasting the favored player in this head-to-head (H2H) matchup.
Looking at their performance under pressure, Added has demonstrated superior breakpoint-saving skills, saving 57.25% of breakpoints, whereas Chidekh has saved 52.89%. This is a crucial stat for in-game betting predictions. Their overall performance over the past year shows Chidekh winning 58.67% of matches, slightly ahead of Added, who has won 56.34%. This offers a useful overview for head-to-head prediction.
An important factor to consider is their performance on different surfaces. Both players have their best career win rates on hard courts, with Chidekh at 69% and Added at 61%. Their weakest surface, grass, leaves them each with a 33% win rate. This gives an indication of who might be favored based on the court surface.
Examining the player level and competition quality, Chidekh has been more successful on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournament circuit in the last year, winning 77.5% of matches. In comparison, Added has a 60.87% win rate at similar levels. The relative event level played by each is an important factor for prediction.
Head-to-head statistics further support Chidekh's favorability. They have faced each other twice, with Chidekh winning both matches. Each of their encounters totaled four sets, all won by Chidekh, and their most recent match concluded with a 7-6(5), 7-5 victory for him. Notably, Chidekh also claimed the solitary tiebreak played between them.
Opponent quality over the last year shows that Chidekh has faced players with an average rank of 359.96, compared to Added’s 438.46. This suggests Chidekh has sustained performance against slightly stronger competition. Regarding deciding sets across all players, Added has a higher success rate, winning 54% of such sets in the last 12 months, compared to Chidekh’s 42%.
Lastly, break point conversion rates offer insights for real-time match predictions. Added has converted 33.97% of break points recently, outpacing Chidekh's 28.34%. Ultimately, while Added shows competitive prowess, the stats, especially head-to-head history and opponent quality, suggest Chidekh holds the upper hand. Therefore, based on the current data, Chidekh appears to be the likely winner of this matchup.
Clement Chidekh Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Maximus Jones
Player
Clement Chidekh
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
25 of
50)
10
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Dominik Palan
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Clement Chidekh
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
10 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
48
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Marvin Moeller
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
49%
(
20 of
41)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Clement Chidekh
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve %
61%
(
34 of
56)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clement Chidekh
Player
Joris De Loore
55%
(
11 of
20)
1st Serve %
79%
(
15 of
19)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
10 of
11)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
4 of
20)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
12 of
19)
28
Total Points Won
11
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
Player
Clement Chidekh
59%
(
55 of
93)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
8
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
86
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Clement Chidekh
67%
(
51 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
11
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
5
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
32 of
53)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
94
Total Points Won
79
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Martineau
Player
Clement Chidekh
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
48 of
70)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
34 of
41)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
15 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
70)
74
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Zizou Bergs
Player
Clement Chidekh
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
30 of
55)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Dan Added Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-1 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| F |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Lucas Poullain
57%
(
52 of
91)
1st Serve %
67%
(
59 of
88)
6
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
56%
(
22 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
28 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Leo Raquillet
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
53%
(
37 of
70)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
14%
(
1 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
60
Total Points Won
65
|
3-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Ben Jones
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
55
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Brian Bozemoj
68%
(
71 of
104)
1st Serve %
60%
(
74 of
124)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
47 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
43%
(
45 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
51 of
124)
110
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(2) 1-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Matteo Lavizzari
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
51
Total Points Won
41
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dan Added
Player
Loann Massard
46%
(
6 of
13)
1st Serve %
59%
(
10 of
17)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
67%
(
4 of
6)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
19
Total Points Won
11
|
6-1 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66% (155/81) | Win/Loss | 59% (313/221) |
| 63% (337/200) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (708/531) |
| 55% (2711/2189) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (6163/5554) |
| 0.22 | Aces Per Game | 0.42 |
| 531 | Aces Total | 2430 |
| 0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 685 | Total Double Faults | 868 |
| 1:32:41 | Average Match Time | 1:35:48 |
| 402.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 496.17 |
| 62% (9144/14687) | 1st Serve % | 59% (20656/34965) |
| 67% (6152/9144) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (14548/20656) |
| 52% (2879/5543) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (7149/14308) |
| 47% (806/1707) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1462/3433) |
| 43% (6601/15270) | Return Points Win % | 40% (13999/34993) |
| 65% (151/231) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (308/528) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (3/3) |
| 51% (25/49) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 55% (96/175) |
| 56% (38/68) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (87/171) |
| 90% (152/137) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (314/273) |
| 10% (152/15) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (314/41) |
| 20% (84/17) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (220/40) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
