Prediction of Cindy Summers vs Maitav Paiss Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

C. Summers vs M. Paiss

Cindy Summers
Cindy Summers

Flag RSA RSA

w
l
w
w
w
l
l
w
l
l
Maitav Paiss
Maitav Paiss

Flag ISR ISR

l
l
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

51
Age
0
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
454
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Summers 1 - 0 Paiss

They have played 2 sets in total, with Cindy Summers winning 2 and Maitav Paiss winning 0. The last match between Cindy Summers and Maitav Paiss was at the ITF Ramat Hasharon 3, 25-11-1991, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Cindy Summers getting the victory 6-2 6-0.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Summers1
Paiss0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q1ITF Ramat Hasharon 3(11-25-91)

Hard
RSA Flag
Cindy Summers
6
6
ISR Flag
Maitav Paiss
2
0

C. Summers vs M. Paiss H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
39.39% (39-60)Career Total W/L0.00% (0-4)
1Hard0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

C. Summers vs M. Paiss Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Cindy Summers has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Maitav Paiss has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Cindy Summers, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Maitav Paiss has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Cindy Summers has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Maitav Paiss has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Cindy Summers has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Maitav Paiss winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Cindy Summers has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 34/45), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 5/15). Maitav Paiss has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 0/4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/4).
  • Player level: In the last year, Cindy Summers has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Maitav Paiss has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Cindy Summers winning 1 times and Maitav Paiss being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Cindy Summers winning 2 and Maitav Paiss winning 0.
  • The last match between Cindy Summers and Maitav Paiss was at the ITF Ramat Hasharon 3, 25-11-1991, Round: Q1, Surface: Hard, with Cindy Summers getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Cindy Summers has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Maitav Paiss has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Cindy Summers has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Maitav Paiss has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Cindy Summers has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Maitav Paiss has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Cindy Summers vs Maitav Paiss Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Summers vs M. Paiss H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won2
0:0:0Average Match Time0:0:0
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Summers 0%, Paiss 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Summers 0%, Paiss 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Summers 0%, Paiss 0%.

C. Summers Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardITF Toluca - 19-06-1995

R3

CUBB. Rodriguez
L
7-5 6-4
HardITF Evansville - 11-07-1994

Q2

CANM. Bernard
L
6-4 6-3

Q1

USAM. Stevenson
W
6-2 6-3
HardITF Indianapolis - 04-07-1994

R3

USAA. Lettiere
L
6-1 6-2
HardITF Columbia - 27-06-1994

R3

USAK. Miller
L
6-0 6-2

M. Paiss Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardITF Haifa 2 - 29-08-1994

R3

ROUR. Sandu
L
6-2 6-2
HardITF Ashkelon - 07-06-1993

Q1

ISRM. Duek
L
6-4 2-6 6-4
HardITF Haifa 1 - 18-05-1992

R3

ISRD. Or
L
6-4 6-1
HardITF Ramat Hasharon 3 - 25-11-1991

Q1

RSAC. Summers
L
6-2 6-0
banner

C. Summers vs M. Paiss Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
39.39% (39/60)YTD Win/Loss0.00% (0/4)
41.89% (93/129)Sets Win/Loss11.11% (1/8)
46.96% (920/1039)Games Win/Loss33.33% (25/50)
43.04% (34/45)Hard Win/Loss0.00% (0/4)
25.00% (5/15)Clay Win/Loss0% (0/0)
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
412.32Average Opponent Rank809.75
39.39% (39/60)Challenger W/L0.00% (0/4)
39% (38/98)Best of 3 Sets Win %0% (0/4)
63% (5/8)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)0% (0/0)
36% (9/25)Deciding Set Win %0% (0/1)
85% (40/34)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
15% (40/6)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
8% (59/5)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (4/0)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Sun, 30 Nov, 10:00 PM
Prediction
COLJ. S. Gomezq
COLN. Mejia2
W1
4.45
W2
1.159
Sun, 30 Nov, 02:00 PM
Prediction
DENE. Moller3
SVKA. Martinq
W1
1.26
W2
3.4
Sun, 30 Nov, 02:00 PM
Prediction
GBRA. Fery1
BELM. Geerts
W1
1.22
W2
3.74
Sun, 30 Nov, 05:00 PM
Prediction
ARGJ. Estevez1
URUJ. A. Cardozo2
W1
2.24
W2
1.56
Sun, 30 Nov, 12:05 PM
Prediction
NEDM. Houkes1
GERR. Strombachs3
W1
1.71
W2
1.99
Sun, 30 Nov, 02:00 PM
Prediction
ESPI. A. Valiente
FRAC. Vandermeersch2
W1
2.88
W2
1.35