Chun Hsin Tseng vs Sumit Nagal Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 09 Jul at 01:48 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Hsin Tseng vs S. Nagal

TPE
0
Win
Played
1
Win

IND
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Tseng 0 - 1 Nagal
They have played 3 sets in total, with Chun Hsin Tseng winning 1 and Sumit Nagal winning 2. The last match between Sumit Nagal and Chun Hsin Tseng was at the Trieste Challenger, 09-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Draw getting the victory 6-1 2-6 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tseng | 0 |
| Nagal | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Trieste Challenger(07-09-25)
C. H. Tseng vs S. Nagal H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $394,315 | Career Prize Money | $577,520 |
| 57.23% (269-201) | Career Total W/L | 59.35% (365-250) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 10 | Titles | 15 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 26.32% (5-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 40.00% (2-3) |
C. H. Tseng vs S. Nagal Match Preview:
- Tseng's recent performance shows a stronger second serve, winning 46.3% of points compared to Nagal's 38.83%. Could this give Tseng an edge in serving resilience?
- Nagal has a slight advantage in returning, winning 46.58% of second serve points and 30.99% of first serve returns, outperforming Tseng in these areas.
- Under pressure, Tseng saves 58.62% of breakpoints, slightly better than Nagal's 53.26%, indicating a potential advantage when facing critical points.
- Tseng has a higher overall match win percentage in the past year (53.25%) relative to Nagal's 34.04%, suggesting better recent form overall.
- Both players excel on clay, holding a 62% win rate, but struggle on grass, with Tseng at 14% and Nagal at 0%.
- At the Challenger/ITF level over the last year, Tseng has been more successful, winning 67.57% of matches, in contrast to Nagal's 40%.
- Tseng often competes against slightly lower-ranked players (average rank 237.06) than Nagal (average rank 200.96), which might explain performance disparities.
- In deciding sets, Nagal holds a slight edge, winning 54% compared to Tseng's 50%, indicating greater resilience in close matches.
- When converting breakpoints, Nagal is more efficient, with a 35.71% conversion rate compared to Tseng's 29.8%.
Editorial Prediction (July 9, 2025, UTC):
The forthcoming match promises to be a tightly contested battle with each player showing distinct strengths.
Tseng's superior second serve performance may grant him a slight advantage, especially in serving stability. Additionally, his better success rate under pressure could be a critical factor during clutch moments in the match. His overall higher match win percentage over the past year further highlights an edge in recent form.
Conversely, Nagal's proficiency in returning serves and slightly higher efficiency in converting breakpoints indicate his potential to apply consistent pressure on Tseng's serve. With a minor advantage in deciding sets, Nagal shows notable resilience in extended matches.
Despite these close comparisons, Tseng's greater overall success rate and strength in key areas suggest he is the likely winner in this upcoming encounter.
Chun Hsin Tseng vs Sumit Nagal Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. H. Tseng vs S. Nagal H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 1 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 13 | Games Won | 15 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:47:40 | Average Match Time | 2:47:40 |
| 51% (43/85) | 1st Serve % | 57% (55/96) |
| 77% (33/43) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (37/55) |
| 33% (14/42) | 2nd Serve Win % | 39% (16/41) |
| 36% (5/14) | Break Pts Won % | 86% (6/7) |
| 45% (43/96) | Return Points Win % | 45% (38/85) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. H. Tseng Recent Matches Played
S. Nagal Recent Matches Played

C. H. Tseng vs S. Nagal Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.23% (269/201) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.35% (365/250) |
| 55.41% (615/495) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.02% (832/602) |
| 52.12% (5427/4985) | Games Win/Loss | 53.25% (7036/6176) |
| 55.91% (104/82) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.65% (98/75) |
| 61.57% (141/88) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.14% (256/156) |
| 47.92% (23/25) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.74% (11/16) |
| 14.29% (1/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/3) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 1222 | Aces Total | 831 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1122 | Total Double Faults | 1318 |
| 1:43:16 | Average Match Time | 1:33:45 |
| 270.81 | Average Opponent Rank | 479.08 |
| 59% (19038/32234) | 1st Serve % | 68% (25789/38100) |
| 68% (12886/19038) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (16550/25789) |
| 51% (6760/13196) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6191/12297) |
| 42% (1412/3390) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (2012/4564) |
| 41% (13192/32399) | Return Points Win % | 43% (16784/39097) |
| 31.58% (6/13) | Slam W/L | 33.33% (10/20) |
| 39.13% (9/14) | Masters W/L | 35.71% (5/9) |
| 57.14% (8/6) | Cups W/L | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 30.23% (13/30) | Main Tour W/L | 42.37% (25/34) |
| 59.85% (164/110) | Challenger W/L | 58.60% (201/142) |
| 71.13% (69/28) | Futures W/L | 75.00% (117/39) |
| 59% (263/448) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (355/591) |
| 7% (1/15) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 25% (4/16) |
| 47% (65/138) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (89/155) |
| 53% (84/158) | Deciding Set Win % | 49% (94/193) |
| 84% (267/224) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (382/324) |
| 16% (267/43) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (382/56) |
| 22% (203/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (233/40) |