Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chun Hsin Tseng vs Fabrice Martin Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tseng vs Martin analysis and find out who is favored!
Chun Hsin Tseng vs Fabrice Martin Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tseng has won 51.2% of points on his second serve, while Martin has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tseng, in recent form, has won 51.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Martin has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.37% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tseng has saved 62.37% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Martin has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tseng has won 52.73% of matches played (W/L 29/ 26), with Martin winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tseng has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 97/ 61), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Martin has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 162/ 124), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 20/ 41).
- Player level: In the last year, Tseng has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 24/ 21), where as Martin has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tseng winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tseng winning 2 and Martin winning 0. The last match between Tseng and Martin was at the Canberra Challenger, 07-01-2019, First, Hard with Chun Hsin Tseng getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:23:40.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tseng and Martin have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tseng winning 0 times and Martin 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Tseng winning 1, and Martin 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tseng has played against opponents with an average rank of 339.6 while Martin has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tseng has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Martin has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tseng has converted 43.58% of breakpoint opportunities, and Martin has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tseng 1 - 0 Martin
250
Rank
83
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
228
High
37
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
59% (209-143)
Career Total W/L
53% (287-250)
59% (16-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$180,215
Career Prize Money
$26,265
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Chun Hsin Tseng | Fabrice Martin |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 9 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:23:40 | 1:23:40 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (41/69) | 56% (34/61) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 85% (35/41) | 79% (27/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 54% (15/28) | 44% (12/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 36% (22/61) | 28% (19/69) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Fabrice Martin
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
0
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
27 of
34)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chun Hsin Tseng | Fabrice Martin |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 59% (16/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (33/30) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (306/295) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 77% (10/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 86 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.28 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 82 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:42 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 334.89 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (1041/1955) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (726/1041) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (468/914) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (78/179) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (753/1920) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (16/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (15/26) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (12/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (12/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (15/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Chun Hsin Tseng Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Quentin Halys
56%
(
72 of
129)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
33 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Tristan Lamasine
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Joao Domingues
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Titouan Droguet
33%
(
4 of
12)
1st Serve %
52%
(
11 of
21)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
21
Total Points Won
12
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
49%
(
49 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Matteo Martineau
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
55%
(
49 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
44 of
73)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
58%
(
23 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
34 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
27 of
73)
82
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Fabrice Martin Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Fabrice Martin
73%
(
49 of
67)
1st Serve %
77%
(
53 of
69)
2
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Frederik Nielsen
Player
Fabrice Martin
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
4
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
3
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
29 of
41)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Fabrice Martin
59%
(
41 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
0
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
27 of
34)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
22 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Alexandre Muller
Player
Fabrice Martin
81%
(
52 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
31 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Fabrice Martin
Player
Dan Added
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
7
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Fabrice Martin
Player
Oscar Otte
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
43%
(
39 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
84
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikael Torpegaard
Player
Fabrice Martin
58%
(
51 of
88)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
1
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
97
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hugo Pontico
Player
Fabrice Martin
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
95)
6
Aces
14
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
46 of
57)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
23 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Vaclav Safranek
Player
Fabrice Martin
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
14 of
21)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tseng Vs Martin Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
