Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chun Hsin Tseng vs Dragos Nicolae Madaras Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tseng vs Madaras analysis and find out who is favored!
Chun Hsin Tseng vs Dragos Nicolae Madaras Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tseng has won 51.42% of points on his second serve, while Madaras has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tseng, in recent form, has won 51.55% of his opponent's second serve points, while Madaras has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.61% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tseng has saved 62.75% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Madaras has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tseng has won 54.55% of matches played (W/L 30/ 25), with Madaras winning 72.5% (W/L 29/ 11) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tseng has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 98/ 61), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3). Madaras has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 295/ 139), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Tseng has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 55.56% of matches (W/L 25/ 20), where as Madaras has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 92% of matches (W/L 23/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tseng winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Tseng winning 2 and Madaras winning 1. The last match between Tseng and Madaras was at the M25 Pitesti, 06-08-2021, Quarterfinals, Clay with Chun Hsin Tseng getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:26:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tseng and Madaras have played a deciding set 1 times, with Tseng winning 1 times and Madaras 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tseng winning 0, and Madaras 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tseng has played against opponents with an average rank of 337.85 while Madaras has played against players with an average rank of 224.55.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tseng has won 65% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Madaras has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tseng has converted 43.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Madaras has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tseng 1 - 0 Madaras
251
Rank
83
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
337
Rank
191
High
26
Age
L
Plays
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
59% (210-143)
Career Total W/L
66% (324-165)
61% (17-11)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$180,215
Career Prize Money
$42,460
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Chun Hsin Tseng | Dragos Nicolae Madaras |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:26:0 | 2:26:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (52/76) | 58% (62/106) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 71% (37/52) | 61% (38/62) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 46% (11/24) | 39% (17/44) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (6/12) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (51/106) | 37% (28/76) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 4-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
106)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chun Hsin Tseng | Dragos Nicolae Madaras |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (17/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (35/31) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (322/308) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 46% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 79% (11/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 88 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.27 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 84 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:29 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 329 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (1088/2039) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (761/1088) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (489/951) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (83/192) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (791/2011) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 63% (17/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (16/27) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 82% (9/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (12/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (12/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (16/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Chun Hsin Tseng Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Elias Ymer
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
57%
(
21 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
52%
(
28 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
28 of
54)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
71%
(
20 of
28)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
48
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Quentin Halys
56%
(
72 of
129)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
0
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
35 of
48)
58%
(
33 of
57)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
50 of
129)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Tristan Lamasine
50%
(
26 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Joao Domingues
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jacopo Berrettini
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
43 of
81)
0
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
45 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
93
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Chun Hsin Tseng
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
87)
11
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
40 of
51)
71%
(
25 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
26%
(
22 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Titouan Droguet
33%
(
4 of
12)
1st Serve %
52%
(
11 of
21)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
4 of
4)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
75%
(
6 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
21
Total Points Won
12
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Francesco Maestrelli
49%
(
49 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
0
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
54%
(
27 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chun Hsin Tseng
Player
Matteo Martineau
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
5
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
13 of
37)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
101)
98
Total Points Won
90
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Dragos Nicolae Madaras Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Marko Topo
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve %
72%
(
48 of
67)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Marco Cecchinato
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
7 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
67%
(
42 of
63)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Remy Bertola
59%
(
33 of
56)
1st Serve %
39%
(
19 of
49)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
20 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
31%
(
8 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
34 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cristian Garin
Player
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
8
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
6 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Vlad Andrei Dancu
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
77%
(
36 of
47)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
Sebastian Gima
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
29
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Dragos Nicolae Madaras
Player
David Poljak
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
64)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
100%
(
24 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Tseng Vs Madaras Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Chun Hsin Tseng
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
