Christopher Heyman vs Richard Gabb Head to Head Stats
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Heyman vs R. Gabb

Christopher Heyman
BEL
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
32
Age
33
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
812
C. Rank
Ret.
258
Best Rank
410
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$710
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Richard Gabb
GBR
l
l
w
l
w
w
l
l
w
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
32
Age
33
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
5'9" (175 cm)
812
C. Rank
Ret.
258
Best Rank
410
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$710
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Heyman 2 - 0 Gabb
They have played 5 sets in total, with Christopher Heyman winning 4 and Richard Gabb winning 1. The last match between Christopher Heyman and Richard Gabb was at the Israel F15 (Meitar), 01-11-2017, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Christopher Heyman getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Heyman | 2 |
| Gabb | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) Israel F15 (Meitar)(11-01-17)
Christopher Heyman
6
6
7
Richard Gabb
7
2
6
(F) Turkey F16(04-24-16)
Christopher Heyman
7
6
Richard Gabb
6
0
C. Heyman vs R. Gabb H2H Profile
C. Heyman vs R. Gabb Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Christopher Heyman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Richard Gabb has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Christopher Heyman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Richard Gabb has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Christopher Heyman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Richard Gabb has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Christopher Heyman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Richard Gabb winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Christopher Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 113/58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/31). Richard Gabb has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 144/101), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 14/20).
- Player level: In the last year, Christopher Heyman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Richard Gabb has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Christopher Heyman winning 2 times and Richard Gabb being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Christopher Heyman winning 4 and Richard Gabb winning 1.
- The last match between Christopher Heyman and Richard Gabb was at the Israel F15 (Meitar), 01-11-2017, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Christopher Heyman getting the victory 6-7(4) 6-2 7-6(4).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:12:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Christopher Heyman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Richard Gabb has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Christopher Heyman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Richard Gabb has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Christopher Heyman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Richard Gabb has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Christopher Heyman vs Richard Gabb Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Heyman vs R. Gabb H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 32 | Games Won | 21 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:12:30 | Average Match Time | 2:12:30 |
| 68% (113/165) | 1st Serve % | 64% (109/171) |
| 76% (86/113) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (67/109) |
| 44% (23/52) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (27/62) |
| 53% (9/17) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (4/7) |
| 45% (77/171) | Return Points Win % | 34% (56/165) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Heyman --%, Gabb --%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Heyman --%, Gabb --%.
Break Points Saved %: Heyman --%, Gabb --%.
C. Heyman Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 4-1 ret. | ||
R. Gabb Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 4-6 4-1 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
QF | L | 6-1 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||

C. Heyman vs R. Gabb Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.65% (352/201) | YTD Win/Loss | 54.76% (236/195) |
| 60.44% (767/502) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.42% (529/443) |
| 54.57% (6451/5370) | Games Win/Loss | 51.62% (4651/4359) |
| 66.08% (113/58) | Hard Win/Loss | 58.78% (144/101) |
| 61.11% (154/98) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.25% (36/28) |
| 65.38% (85/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 47.73% (42/46) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 41.18% (14/20) |
| 0.2 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 1139 | Aces Total | 507 |
| 0.15 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 887 | Total Double Faults | 214 |
| 1:18:55 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 562.7 | Average Opponent Rank | 611 |
| 69% (19517/28466) | 1st Serve % | 64% (6040/9430) |
| 68% (13201/19517) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (4086/6040) |
| 52% (4639/8949) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1749/3390) |
| 46% (1323/2869) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (400/879) |
| 41% (11509/28052) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3685/9307) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 40.00% (26/39) | Challenger W/L | 45.83% (22/26) |
| 66.80% (326/162) | Futures W/L | 56.20% (213/166) |
| 64% (343/540) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (231/418) |
| 40% (2/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 51% (86/169) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 58% (69/119) |
| 60% (99/166) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (58/117) |
| 89% (339/301) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (234/198) |
| 11% (339/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (234/34) |
| 24% (214/51) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (197/37) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Sun, 21 Dec, 08:00 PM
PredictionSun, 21 Dec, 02:00 AM
PredictionSun, 21 Dec, 10:00 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

20 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

20 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Blockx Vs Prizmic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

19 Dec 2025
Read Full Article →Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Engel H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
Top Predictions Today
Learner Tien
Alexander Blockx
Mio Mushika
Tahlia Kokkinis
Sohyun Park
Ksenia Efremova
Soha Sadiq
Chandana PotugariSee All Today’s Tennis Predictions
20:00
H2H 0-0
01:00
H2H 0-0
08:30
H2H 0-0
H2H 0-0