Prediction of Christopher Heyman vs Nicolae Frunza Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Heyman vs N. Frunza

Christopher Heyman

BEL

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

812

C. Rank

Ret.

258

Best Rank

442

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Left-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Nicolae Frunza

ROU

3

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'1" (185 cm)

812

C. Rank

Ret.

258

Best Rank

442

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Left-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Heyman 3 - 0 Frunza

They have played 8 sets in total, with Christopher Heyman winning 6 and Nicolae Frunza winning 2. The last match between Christopher Heyman and Nicolae Frunza was at the M15 Antalya, 24-04-2021, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Christopher Heyman getting the victory 6-3 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Heyman	3
Frunza	0

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(SF) M15 Antalya(04-24-21)

Stats

Christopher Heyman

Nicolae Frunza

(R1) M25 Santa Margherita Di Pula(04-02-19)

Stats

Christopher Heyman

Nicolae Frunza

(QF) Turkey F6 (Antalya)(02-17-17)

Stats

Christopher Heyman

Nicolae Frunza

C. Heyman vs N. Frunza H2H Profile

C. Heyman	Stats	N. Frunza
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
63.65% (352-201)	Career Total W/L	62.72% (217-129)
2	Clay	0
1	Hard	0
19	Titles	8
3	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Heyman vs N. Frunza Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Christopher Heyman has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Nicolae Frunza has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Christopher Heyman, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nicolae Frunza has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Christopher Heyman has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nicolae Frunza has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Christopher Heyman has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Nicolae Frunza winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Christopher Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 66% (W/L 113/58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/31). Nicolae Frunza has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 192/109), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 2/3).
Player level: In the last year, Christopher Heyman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Nicolae Frunza has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Christopher Heyman winning 3 times and Nicolae Frunza being victorious 0 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Christopher Heyman winning 6 and Nicolae Frunza winning 2.
The last match between Christopher Heyman and Nicolae Frunza was at the M15 Antalya, 24-04-2021, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Christopher Heyman getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:2:20.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Christopher Heyman has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Nicolae Frunza has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Christopher Heyman has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nicolae Frunza has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Christopher Heyman has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nicolae Frunza has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Christopher Heyman vs Nicolae Frunza Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Heyman vs N. Frunza H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Heyman	Stats	N. Frunza
3	H2H Matches Won	0
6	Sets Won	2
41	Games Won	32
1	Aces (Total)	4
4	Total Double Faults	12
2:2:20	Average Match Time	2:2:20
72% (180/250)	1st Serve %	64% (137/215)
66% (119/180)	1st Serve Win %	60% (82/137)
37% (26/70)	2nd Serve Win %	47% (37/78)
67% (14/21)	Break Pts Won %	38% (10/26)
45% (96/215)	Return Points Win %	42% (105/250)
100% (3/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/3)
100% (2/2)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (3/3)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/3)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Heyman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve Challenger - 23-01-2023
Q1 Tibo ColsonT. Colson	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Lodz - 25-07-2022
R2 Kristjan TammK. Tamm	L	6-4 6-2	Stats
R1 Adrien GobatA. Gobat	W	6-1 6-3	Stats
M25 Marburg - 04-07-2022
R2 Sidane PontjodikromoS. Pontjodikromo	L	7-5 6-4	Stats
R1 Philip SekulicP. Sekulic	W	4-1 ret.	Stats

View All

N. Frunza Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M15 Antalya - 17-10-2022
R2 Yassine DlimiY. Dlimi	L	7-6(4) 6-3	Stats
R1 Gian Matias Di NataleG. Matias	W	3-6 6-1 6-4	Stats
M15 Sozopol - 03-10-2022
QF Maks KasnikowskiM. Kasnikowski	L	7-5 3-0 ret.	Stats
R2 Yanaki MilevY. Milev	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
R1 Simon Anthony IvanovS. Anthony	W	1-6 6-1 6-2	Stats

View All

C. Heyman vs N. Frunza Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Heyman	Stats	N. Frunza
63.65% (352/201)	YTD Win/Loss	62.72% (217/129)
60.44% (767/502)	Sets Win/Loss	60.97% (467/299)
54.57% (6451/5370)	Games Win/Loss	54.46% (3774/3156)
66.08% (113/58)	Hard Win/Loss	57.50% (23/17)
61.11% (154/98)	Clay Win/Loss	63.79% (192/109)
65.38% (85/45)	Indoor Hard W/L	40.00% (2/3)
0.2	Aces Per Game	0.12
1139	Aces Total	409
0.15	Double Faults Per Game	0.23
887	Total Double Faults	775
1:18:55	Average Match Time	1:7:26
560.2	Average Opponent Rank	535.2
69% (19517/28466)	1st Serve %	64% (10427/16386)
68% (13201/19517)	1st Serve Win %	66% (6851/10427)
52% (4639/8949)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (2921/5959)
46% (1323/2869)	Break Points Won % (Total)	48% (935/1968)
41% (11509/28052)	Return Points Win %	44% (7326/16807)
0% (0/0)	Cups W/L	20.00% (1/4)
40.00% (26/39)	Challenger W/L	50.00% (9/9)
66.80% (326/162)	Futures W/L	64.09% (207/116)
64% (343/540)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	65% (213/330)
40% (2/5)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (2/4)
51% (86/169)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	56% (44/79)
60% (99/166)	Deciding Set Win %	57% (47/82)
89% (339/301)	1st Set Won, Won Match	90% (209/189)
11% (339/38)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	9% (209/19)
24% (214/51)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (137/28)