Christina Mchale vs Dalayna Hewitt Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 08 Apr at 05:38 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Mchale vs D. Hewitt

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mchale 1 - 0 Hewitt
They have played 2 sets in total, with Christina Mchale winning 2 and Dalayna Hewitt winning 0. The last match between Christina Mchale and Dalayna Hewitt was at the W35 Boca Raton, 09-04-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Christina Mchale getting the victory 6-2 6-0.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Mchale | 1 |
Hewitt | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W35 Boca Raton(04-09-25)
C. Mchale vs D. Hewitt H2H Profile
C. Mchale vs D. Hewitt Match Preview:
Analyzing the upcoming tennis match between Mchale and Hewitt, we begin by examining their second serve performance over the past six months. Mchale's second serve success rate stands at 36.59%, while Hewitt edges ahead with 41.59%. This is a key predictor of match outcomes, as a higher second serve winning percentage often correlates with victory.
Focusing on return game statistics, Mchale has recently demonstrated a stronger ability to win points on the opponent's second serve, with a 57.65% success rate as compared to Hewitt's 49.34%. When facing the first serve, Mchale again outperforms Hewitt, winning 39.55% of points in contrast to Hewitt's 24.42%. These figures are crucial for determining who might be favored in their head-to-head matchups.
When under pressure, such as during breakpoints, Hewitt has shown resilience by saving 50% of such opportunities, compared to Mchale's 43.55%. This is a valuable statistic for predicting in-game momentum and betting accuracy.
Looking at their overall performance over the past year, Mchale has secured victories in 41.67% of matches, while Hewitt shows a marginally better record with a 42.86% win rate. Analyzing surface preferences, Mchale exhibits her best results on clay courts with a 55% win percentage, in stark contrast to her lesser performance on indoor hard courts at 47%. Conversely, Hewitt prospers most on indoor hard surfaces, sharing the same 55% victory rate, while clay proves less favorable.
Both players have primarily competed in Challenger and ITF tournaments over $10K prize money recently. Mchale has won half of her matches, whereas Hewitt has managed a 42.11% success rate. This detail highlights the relative event level factor in predicting match favorites.
Considering opponent quality, Mchale has faced competitors with an average ranking of 430.83, slightly superior to Hewitt's average opponent ranking of 457.07. Both players have a 33% win rate in deciding sets over the past year, suggesting potential for tight matches.
Mchale's current form in converting breakpoints is notably stronger at 52.56%, while Hewitt lags with a 26.19% conversion rate. This critical statistic significantly impacts in-game decision-making and predictions.
In summary, the combination of stronger second serve returns, better breakpoint conversion, and higher-level recent match performance statistically favors Mchale to secure a win against Hewitt in this matchup. Therefore, based on the analyzed metrics, Mchale emerges as the more likely victor.
Christina Mchale vs Dalayna Hewitt Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Mchale vs D. Hewitt H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 2 |
0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
1:8:1 | Average Match Time | 1:8:1 |
54% (21/39) | 1st Serve % | 50% (22/44) |
71% (15/21) | 1st Serve Win % | 36% (8/22) |
83% (15/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (10/22) |
50% (5/10) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/2) |
59% (26/44) | Return Points Win % | 23% (9/39) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Mchale Recent Matches Played
D. Hewitt Recent Matches Played

C. Mchale vs D. Hewitt Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
51.53% (371/349) | YTD Win/Loss | 49.62% (131/133) |
51.53% (873/821) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.33% (307/303) |
50.75% (7990/7755) | Games Win/Loss | 50.51% (2872/2814) |
51.28% (220/209) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.57% (89/87) |
54.79% (103/85) | Clay Win/Loss | 38.24% (13/21) |
47.06% (16/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.70% (29/25) |
46.38% (32/37) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.61 |
1383 | Aces Total | 1708 |
0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.49 |
2149 | Total Double Faults | 1349 |
1:29:24 | Average Match Time | 1:28:36 |
458.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 487.38 |
62% (27922/44786) | 1st Serve % | 58% (9034/15610) |
63% (17481/27922) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (6424/9034) |
45% (7517/16864) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (3031/6576) |
46% (2514/5448) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (737/1728) |
45% (19905/44549) | Return Points Win % | 41% (6730/16506) |
39.77% (35/53) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
56.38% (106/82) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
50.00% (5/5) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
48.91% (134/140) | Main Tour W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
56.64% (81/62) | Challenger W/L | 45.60% (88/105) |
58.82% (10/7) | Futures W/L | 62.12% (41/25) |
51% (364/708) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (130/261) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
49% (80/162) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (26/67) |
48% (124/261) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (38/83) |
78% (383/300) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 78% (142/111) |
21% (383/81) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 21% (142/30) |
20% (337/68) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (122/20) |