search

Christian Lindell vs Nerman Fatic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com

By Wojtek Kolan

At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lindell vs Fatic analysis and find out who is favored!

Our tennis head to head predictions work!
Sign up now!

Up to 78% win accuracy on past h2h matches

Christian Lindell vs Nerman Fatic Important H2H Prediction Stats:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lindell has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Fatic has won 48.75%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lindell, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fatic has won 47.49%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 36.33% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Lindell has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fatic has saved 60.19% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Lindell has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Fatic winning 54.93% (W/L 39/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Lindell has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 415/ 271), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5). Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 278/ 185), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lindell winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lindell winning 2 and Fatic winning 1. The last match between Lindell and Fatic was at the M15 Porec, 12-03-2019, First, Clay with Christian Lindell getting the victory .
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:59:0.
  • Deciding set H2H prediction: Lindell and Fatic have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lindell winning 1 times and Fatic 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
  • Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lindell winning 0, and Fatic 0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lindell has played against opponents with an average rank of while Fatic has played against players with an average rank of 256.61.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lindell has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fatic has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Lindell has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fatic has converted 43.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
bet365

Head-to-head: Lindell 1 - 0 Fatic

Christian Lindell

13

Total

0

Mast

0

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

13

Minor

Ret.

Rank

177

High

32

Age

R

Plays

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

200

Rank

191

High

29

Age

R

Plays

Nerman Fatic

8

Total

0

Mast

2

Chall

0

Slam

0

Main

6

Minor

1

Total

0

0

Hard

0

1

Clay

0

0

Indoor

0

0

Grass

0

L L L L L L W L L L

Form

W L W L W W L W L L

59% (442-303)

Career Total W/L

58% (338-248)

0% (0-0)

YTD W/L

50% (5-5)

$68,305

Career Prize Money

$70,890

0

YTD Titles

0

Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.

banner

Lindell VS Fatic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

stats Christian Lindell Nerman Fatic
All H2H Matches 1 0
Sets Won 2 1
Games Won 13 9
Aces (Total) 3 4
DFs (Total) 2 7
Avg Match Time 1:59:0 1:59:0
1st Serve % 69% (47/68) 67% (52/78)
1st Serve Win% 66% (31/47) 54% (28/52)
2nd Serve Win% 29% (6/21) 23% (6/26)
BPs Won% (Total) 47% (7/15) 71% (5/7)
Return Points W% 56% (44/78) 46% (31/68)
Best of 3 Sets W% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Deciding Set Win% 100% (1/1) 0% (0/1)
1st set W, W 100% (1/1) 0% (0/0)
1st set W, L 0% (1/0) 0% (0/0)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 0% (1/0)

Lindell VS Fatic H2h Matches played

Winning Player Losing Player Score
6-1 1-6 6-2
cross
Christian Lindell
Player
Nerman Fatic
69% ( 47 of 68)
1st Serve %
67% ( 52 of 78)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
7
66% ( 31 of 47)
1st Serve Won
54% ( 28 of 52)
29% ( 6 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
23% ( 6 of 26)
47% ( 7 of 15)
Break Points Won
71% ( 5 of 7)
46% ( 31 of 68)
Rtn Points Won
56% ( 44 of 78)
81
Total Points Won
65

Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

stats Christian Lindell Nerman Fatic
YTD W/L 0% (0/0) 50% (5/5)
Sets Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 50% (12/12)
Games Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 48% (110/121)
Hard Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 50% (3/3)
Clay Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 33% (1/2)
Indoor Hard W/L 0% (0/0) 100% (1/0)
Grass Win/Loss 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Aces pg 0 0.51
Aces Total 0 58
DFs per game 0 0.21
DFs Total 0 24
Avg Match Time N/A 1:34:31
Avg Opp Rank 0 277.7
1st Serve % 0% (0/0) 62% (393/632)
1st Serve W% 0% (0/0) 72% (282/393)
2nd Serve W% 0% (0/0) 49% (117/239)
BPs Won% Total 0% (0/0) 33% (16/49)
Return Pts W% 0% (0/0) 36% (235/659)
Slam W/L 0% (0/0) 50% (1/1)
Masters W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Cups W/L 0% (0/0) 100% (1/0)
Main Tour W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Tour Finals W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Challenger W/L 0% (0/0) 43% (3/4)
Futures W/L 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
Best of 3 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 50% (5/10)
Best of 5 Sets W% 0% (0/0) 0% (0/0)
TBs Win% (Total) 0% (0/0) 60% (3/5)
Deciding Set W% 0% (0/0) 50% (2/4)
1st set W, W 0% (0/0) 80% (5/4)
1st set W, L 0% (0/0) 20% (5/1)
1st set L, W 0% (0/0) 20% (5/1)

Christian Lindell Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Franco Agamenone
Player
Christian Lindell
62% ( 28 of 45)
1st Serve %
68% ( 32 of 47)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
79% ( 22 of 28)
1st Serve Won
50% ( 16 of 32)
59% ( 10 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
27% ( 4 of 15)
100% ( 5 of 5)
Break Points Won
33% ( 1 of 3)
29% ( 13 of 45)
Rtn Points Won
57% ( 27 of 47)
59
Total Points Won
33
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Mathys Erhard
Player
Christian Lindell
78% ( 73 of 94)
1st Serve %
68% ( 70 of 103)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
62% ( 45 of 73)
1st Serve Won
63% ( 44 of 70)
43% ( 9 of 21)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 14 of 33)
38% ( 5 of 13)
Break Points Won
67% ( 4 of 6)
43% ( 40 of 94)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 45 of 103)
99
Total Points Won
98
L
2-6 6-2 7-5 H2H
R2
cross
Martin Krumich
Player
Christian Lindell
63% ( 45 of 72)
1st Serve %
62% ( 31 of 50)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
71% ( 32 of 45)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 17 of 31)
44% ( 12 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
37% ( 7 of 19)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
9% ( 1 of 11)
39% ( 28 of 72)
Rtn Points Won
52% ( 26 of 50)
70
Total Points Won
52
L
6-3 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Christian Lindell
Player
Patrik Rikl
57% ( 33 of 58)
1st Serve %
58% ( 34 of 59)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
64% ( 21 of 33)
1st Serve Won
56% ( 19 of 34)
64% ( 16 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
44% ( 11 of 25)
40% ( 4 of 10)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
36% ( 21 of 58)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 29 of 59)
66
Total Points Won
51
W
6-3 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Andrew Paulson
Player
Christian Lindell
83% ( 39 of 47)
1st Serve %
62% ( 33 of 53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
67% ( 26 of 39)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 18 of 33)
63% ( 5 of 8)
2nd Serve Won
35% ( 7 of 20)
100% ( 5 of 5)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
34% ( 16 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
53% ( 28 of 53)
59
Total Points Won
41
L
6-2 6-3 H2H
R1
cross
Martin Krumich
Player
Christian Lindell
69% ( 36 of 52)
1st Serve %
69% ( 31 of 45)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
72% ( 26 of 36)
1st Serve Won
55% ( 17 of 31)
69% ( 11 of 16)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 5 of 14)
80% ( 4 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
29% ( 15 of 52)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 23 of 45)
60
Total Points Won
37
L
6-3 6-1 H2H
R1
cross
Tomas Barrios Vera
Player
Christian Lindell
69% ( 66 of 96)
1st Serve %
58% ( 48 of 83)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
65% ( 43 of 66)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 28 of 48)
53% ( 16 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
49% ( 17 of 35)
70% ( 7 of 10)
Break Points Won
45% ( 5 of 11)
39% ( 37 of 96)
Rtn Points Won
46% ( 38 of 83)
97
Total Points Won
82
L
4-6 6-1 7-6(4) H2H
Q1
cross
Juan Pablo Varillas
Player
Christian Lindell
41% ( 46 of 112)
1st Serve %
70% ( 72 of 103)
5
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
1
80% ( 37 of 46)
1st Serve Won
69% ( 50 of 72)
52% ( 34 of 66)
2nd Serve Won
45% ( 14 of 31)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
44% ( 4 of 9)
37% ( 41 of 112)
Rtn Points Won
38% ( 39 of 103)
110
Total Points Won
105
L
4-6 7-5 7-6(3) H2H
Q1
cross
Thiago Seyboth Wild
Player
Christian Lindell
57% ( 38 of 67)
1st Serve %
67% ( 42 of 63)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
79% ( 30 of 38)
1st Serve Won
64% ( 27 of 42)
48% ( 14 of 29)
2nd Serve Won
48% ( 10 of 21)
50% ( 3 of 6)
Break Points Won
25% ( 1 of 4)
34% ( 23 of 67)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 26 of 63)
70
Total Points Won
60
L
6-1 7-6(4) H2H
Q2
cross
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Christian Lindell
83% ( 52 of 63)
1st Serve %
57% ( 35 of 61)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
5
73% ( 38 of 52)
1st Serve Won
66% ( 23 of 35)
45% ( 5 of 11)
2nd Serve Won
42% ( 11 of 26)
100% ( 4 of 4)
Break Points Won
50% ( 1 of 2)
32% ( 20 of 63)
Rtn Points Won
44% ( 27 of 61)
70
Total Points Won
54
L
7-5 6-2 H2H

Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played

opponent Result Score H2H
R1
cross
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66% ( 39 of 59)
1st Serve %
70% ( 52 of 74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59% ( 23 of 39)
1st Serve Won
58% ( 30 of 52)
70% ( 14 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
36% ( 8 of 22)
31% ( 4 of 13)
Break Points Won
100% ( 1 of 1)
37% ( 22 of 59)
Rtn Points Won
49% ( 36 of 74)
73
Total Points Won
60
L
6-0 7-6(5) H2H
R2
cross
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73% ( 66 of 91)
1st Serve %
56% ( 50 of 89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55% ( 36 of 66)
1st Serve Won
62% ( 31 of 50)
64% ( 16 of 25)
2nd Serve Won
33% ( 13 of 39)
54% ( 7 of 13)
Break Points Won
25% ( 3 of 12)
43% ( 39 of 91)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 45 of 89)
97
Total Points Won
83
L
4-6 6-3 6-0 H2H
R1
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69% ( 59 of 86)
1st Serve %
64% ( 63 of 99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76% ( 45 of 59)
1st Serve Won
59% ( 37 of 63)
48% ( 13 of 27)
2nd Serve Won
47% ( 17 of 36)
55% ( 6 of 11)
Break Points Won
33% ( 2 of 6)
33% ( 28 of 86)
Rtn Points Won
45% ( 45 of 99)
103
Total Points Won
82
W
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 H2H
R2
cross
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64% ( 30 of 47)
1st Serve %
57% ( 28 of 49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83% ( 25 of 30)
1st Serve Won
71% ( 20 of 28)
71% ( 12 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
43% ( 9 of 21)
75% ( 3 of 4)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 3)
21% ( 10 of 47)
Rtn Points Won
41% ( 20 of 49)
57
Total Points Won
39
L
6-1 6-4 H2H
R1
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
65% ( 56 of 86)
1st Serve %
69% ( 49 of 71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
79% ( 44 of 56)
1st Serve Won
82% ( 40 of 49)
53% ( 16 of 30)
2nd Serve Won
68% ( 15 of 22)
33% ( 1 of 3)
Break Points Won
17% ( 1 of 6)
30% ( 26 of 86)
Rtn Points Won
23% ( 16 of 71)
76
Total Points Won
81
W
7-6(3) 7-6(5) H2H
Rubber 1
W
3-6 6-3 6-4 H2H
Q2
cross
Terence Atmane
Player
Nerman Fatic
68% ( 76 of 111)
1st Serve %
63% ( 49 of 78)
11
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
74% ( 56 of 76)
1st Serve Won
78% ( 38 of 49)
51% ( 18 of 35)
2nd Serve Won
66% ( 19 of 29)
67% ( 2 of 3)
Break Points Won
9% ( 1 of 11)
33% ( 37 of 111)
Rtn Points Won
27% ( 21 of 78)
95
Total Points Won
94
L
6-3 3-6 7-5 H2H
Q1
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Illya Marchenko
64% ( 39 of 61)
1st Serve %
56% ( 48 of 85)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
79% ( 31 of 39)
1st Serve Won
65% ( 31 of 48)
68% ( 15 of 22)
2nd Serve Won
57% ( 21 of 37)
20% ( 1 of 5)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
25% ( 15 of 61)
Rtn Points Won
39% ( 33 of 85)
79
Total Points Won
67
W
6-4 7-6(5) H2H
QF
cross
Denis Yevseyev
Player
Nerman Fatic
61% ( 27 of 44)
1st Serve %
51% ( 30 of 59)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
81% ( 22 of 27)
1st Serve Won
57% ( 17 of 30)
65% ( 11 of 17)
2nd Serve Won
41% ( 12 of 29)
44% ( 4 of 9)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 0)
25% ( 11 of 44)
Rtn Points Won
51% ( 30 of 59)
63
Total Points Won
40
L
6-2 6-2 H2H
Q1
cross
Nerman Fatic
Player
Brandon Walkin
60% ( 30 of 50)
1st Serve %
69% ( 36 of 52)
8
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
87% ( 26 of 30)
1st Serve Won
67% ( 24 of 36)
60% ( 12 of 20)
2nd Serve Won
38% ( 6 of 16)
100% ( 3 of 3)
Break Points Won
0% ( 0 of 2)
24% ( 12 of 50)
Rtn Points Won
42% ( 22 of 52)
60
Total Points Won
42
W
6-2 6-4 H2H

Lindell Vs Fatic Prediction H2H Images To Share

Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions

Unlock All Predictions