Prediction of Chris Oneil vs Betsy Nagelsen Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
C. Oneil vs B. Nagelsen

Chris Oneil

AUS

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Betsy Nagelsen

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Oneil 1 - 1 Nagelsen

They have played 8 sets in total, with Chris Oneil winning 2 and Betsy Nagelsen winning 6. The last match between Betsy Nagelsen and Chris Oneil was at the Tokyo Japan Open, 17-10-1983, Round: R4, Surface: N/A, with Betsy Nagelsen getting the victory 7-6 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Oneil	1
Nagelsen	1

Last 4 H2H Matches:

(R4) Tokyo Japan Open(10-17-83)

Stats

Betsy Nagelsen

Chris Oneil

(F) Australian Open(12-25-78)

Stats

Chris Oneil

Betsy Nagelsen

(R2) Wimbledon Plate(06-28-76)

Stats

Betsy Nagelsen

Chris Oneil

C. Oneil vs B. Nagelsen H2H Profile

C. Oneil	Stats	B. Nagelsen
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
51.78% (175-163)	Career Total W/L	48.97% (356-371)
1	Grass	1
1	Titles	2
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

C. Oneil vs B. Nagelsen Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chris Oneil has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Betsy Nagelsen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chris Oneil, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Betsy Nagelsen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Chris Oneil has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Betsy Nagelsen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Chris Oneil has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Betsy Nagelsen winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Chris Oneil has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 65/47), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 46% (W/L 46/53). Betsy Nagelsen has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 89/59), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 90/108).
Player level: In the last year, Chris Oneil has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Betsy Nagelsen has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 4 times before with Chris Oneil winning 1 times and Betsy Nagelsen being victorious 3 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Chris Oneil winning 2 and Betsy Nagelsen winning 6.
The last match between Chris Oneil and Betsy Nagelsen was at the Tokyo Japan Open, 17-10-1983, Round: R4, Surface: N/A, with Betsy Nagelsen getting the victory 7-6 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chris Oneil has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Betsy Nagelsen has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chris Oneil has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Betsy Nagelsen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Chris Oneil has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Betsy Nagelsen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Chris Oneil vs Betsy Nagelsen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

C. Oneil vs B. Nagelsen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

C. Oneil	Stats	B. Nagelsen
1	H2H Matches Won	3
2	Sets Won	6
35	Games Won	47
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
25% (1/4)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	75% (3/4)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (3/3)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/3)
0% (0/3)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

C. Oneil Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 24-06-1985
Q2 Hu NaH. Na	L	6-4 6-1	Stats
Q1 Carin AnderholmC. Anderholm	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 29-11-1983
Q2 Sophie AmiachS. Amiach	L	3-6 6-0 6-3	Stats
Q1 Annette GulleyA. Gulley	W	6-1 3-6 6-0	Stats
Sydney - 21-11-1983
R2 Sherry AckerS. Acker	L	7-6 7-6	Stats

View All

B. Nagelsen Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Indian Wells - 21-02-1994
R3 Natalia ZverevaN. Zvereva	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
Budapest - 18-10-1993
Q1 Asa CarlssonA. Carlsson	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
Montpellier - 11-10-1993
R3 Natalia BaudoneN. Baudone	L	6-0 6-4	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 21-06-1993
Q2 Sophie AmiachS. Amiach	L	7-6 6-4	Stats
Q1 Alison SmithA. Smith	W	6-3 6-2	Stats

View All

C. Oneil vs B. Nagelsen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

C. Oneil	Stats	B. Nagelsen
51.78% (175/163)	YTD Win/Loss	48.97% (356/371)
51.01% (378/363)	Sets Win/Loss	49.59% (850/864)
50.68% (3423/3331)	Games Win/Loss	49.70% (7950/8046)
46.67% (21/24)	Hard Win/Loss	45.45% (90/108)
56.67% (34/26)	Clay Win/Loss	46.81% (44/50)
40.91% (9/13)	Indoor Hard W/L	39.53% (51/78)
58.04% (65/47)	Grass Win/Loss	60.14% (89/59)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
105.96	Average Opponent Rank	203.59
69.23% (9/4)	Slam W/L	53.33% (8/7)
40.00% (6/9)	Challenger W/L	80.77% (21/5)
41.67% (30/42)	Futures W/L	37.74% (40/66)
52% (167/323)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (348/712)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (3/3)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	56% (5/9)
52% (47/91)	Deciding Set Win %	47% (128/273)
87% (170/148)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (348/281)
13% (170/22)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (348/67)
12% (155/19)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	19% (373/72)