Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Chloe Paquet vs Harmony Tan Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Paquet vs Tan analysis and find out who is favored!
Chloe Paquet vs Harmony Tan Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paquet has won 45.93% of points on his second serve, while Tan has won 45.56%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paquet, in recent form, has won 56.12% of his opponent's second serve points, while Tan has won 55.02%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.75% and 38.11% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paquet has saved 51.38% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tan has saved 57.58% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paquet has won 54.55% of matches played (W/L 42/ 35), with Tan winning 54.24% (W/L 32/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paquet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 224/ 193), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 36% (W/L 4/ 7). Tan has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 8/ 5), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 126/ 122).
- Player level: In the last year, Paquet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.9% of matches (W/L 33/ 25), where as Tan has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 59.62% of matches (W/L 31/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Paquet winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Paquet winning 4 and Tan winning 3. The last match between Paquet and Tan was at the W80 Poitiers, 30-10-2021, Semifinals, I.hard with Chloe Paquet getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Paquet and Tan have played a deciding set 0 times, with Paquet winning 0 times and Tan 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Paquet winning 0, and Tan 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paquet has played against opponents with an average rank of 254.58 while Tan has played against players with an average rank of 267.73.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paquet has won 37% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tan has won 44% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paquet has converted 43.03% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tan has converted 54.24% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Paquet 2 - 1 Tan
149
Rank
101
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard1
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
227
Rank
90
High
26
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
52% (393-364)
Career Total W/L
55% (326-270)
54% (14-12)
YTD W/L
53% (10-9)
$218,175
Career Prize Money
$557,698
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Chloe Paquet | Harmony Tan |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
| Games Won | 29 | 26 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 7 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:12:0 | 1:12:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (93/150) | 58% (77/133) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (62/93) | 62% (48/77) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 39% (22/57) | 54% (30/56) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (5/10) | 36% (9/25) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (55/133) | 44% (66/150) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 50% (2/1) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4-6 6-4 3-2 ret. |
Stats 
Chloe Paquet
Player
Harmony Tan
62%
(
48 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
82)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Chloe Paquet
57%
(
29 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
38 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Chloe Paquet | Harmony Tan |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (14/12) | 53% (10/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 52% (32/29) | 56% (24/19) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (281/258) | 54% (193/166) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 36% (4/7) | 0% (0/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 43% (3/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.31 |
| Aces Total | 59 | 54 |
| DFs per game | 0.43 | 0.3 |
| DFs Total | 113 | 53 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:53:17 | 1:29:16 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 265.12 | 260.37 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1011/1721) | 54% (658/1229) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (635/1011) | 68% (445/658) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (322/710) | 46% (262/571) |
| BPs Won% Total | 41% (113/276) | 54% (67/124) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (883/1898) | 44% (514/1161) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) | 25% (1/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (12/8) | 64% (9/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 54% (14/26) | 59% (10/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 56% (5/9) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (12/10) | 69% (13/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (12/2) | 31% (13/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 29% (14/4) | 17% (6/1) |
Chloe Paquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Celine Naef
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
24 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Peyton Stearns
59%
(
50 of
85)
1st Serve %
64%
(
51 of
80)
9
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
3
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Iryna Shymanovich
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
69%
(
35 of
51)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Renata Zarazua
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
37%
(
24 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
80
Total Points Won
66
|
3-6 6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kristina Mladenovic
Player
Chloe Paquet
75%
(
78 of
104)
1st Serve %
59%
(
51 of
86)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
7
63%
(
49 of
78)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
44%
(
46 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
43 of
86)
101
Total Points Won
89
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Polona Hercog
Player
Chloe Paquet
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
72%
(
54 of
75)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Justina Mikulskyte
55%
(
45 of
82)
1st Serve %
73%
(
67 of
92)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
45%
(
37 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Andreea Mitu
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Aurora Zantedeschi
64%
(
56 of
88)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
108)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
33%
(
7 of
21)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
32 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
54 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(4) 6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Lois Boisson
Player
Chloe Paquet
74%
(
65 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
78%
(
18 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
34 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
88
Total Points Won
75
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Harmony Tan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ella Seidel
Player
Harmony Tan
57%
(
12 of
21)
1st Serve %
25%
(
4 of
16)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
42%
(
5 of
12)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
67%
(
6 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
48%
(
10 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
75%
(
12 of
16)
23
Total Points Won
14
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Tina Nadine Smith
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Eden Silva
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve %
78%
(
52 of
67)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
13 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
36 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jessika Ponchet
Player
Harmony Tan
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
32 of
66)
3
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
8
77%
(
27 of
35)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
26 of
32)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Iryna Shymanovich
Player
Harmony Tan
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
42%
(
29 of
69)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Katarina Kozarov
39%
(
17 of
44)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
65%
(
11 of
17)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
57
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nuria Brancaccio
Player
Harmony Tan
76%
(
50 of
66)
1st Serve %
45%
(
29 of
64)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
80
Total Points Won
50
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Audrey Albie
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Anastasia Tikhonova
65%
(
71 of
110)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
38%
(
42 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Harmony Tan
Player
Amandine Monnot
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
18 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Paquet Vs Tan Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
