Chihiro Muramatsu vs Sohyun Park Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 May at 11:18 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Muramatsu vs S. Park

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Muramatsu 1 - 0 Park
They have played 3 sets in total, with Chihiro Muramatsu winning 2 and Sohyun Park winning 1. The last match between Chihiro Muramatsu and Sohyun Park was at the W35 Changwon, 14-05-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Chihiro Muramatsu getting the victory 6-7(3) 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Muramatsu | 1 |
| Park | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W35 Changwon(05-14-25)
C. Muramatsu vs S. Park H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $95,167 | Career Prize Money | $9,698 |
| 55.58% (289-231) | Career Total W/L | 61.22% (221-140) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 8 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 66.67% (4-2) |
C. Muramatsu vs S. Park Match Preview:
- How do Muramatsu and Park compare in second serve performance? Muramatsu wins 38.48% of points, whereas Park has a slight edge with 40.34% in recent form.
- Who has better return stats? Muramatsu leads by winning 53.62% of opponents' second serve points, while Park wins 48.7%.
- Muramatsu also has an advantage in first serve returns, winning 39.76% compared to Park's 34.26%.
- Under pressure, Park slightly leads by saving 49.62% of breakpoints, compared to Muramatsu's 48.15%.
- Overall performance over the past year shows Muramatsu with a 63.01% match win rate, while Park has a 60.81% win rate.
- Which surfaces favor them? Muramatsu excels on Hard courts (59%), whereas Park performs best on Clay (64%).
- Both players compete in Challengers/ITF events, with Muramatsu winning 64.52% of matches and Park at 61.54%.
- Muramatsu has faced stronger opponents, with an average rank of 345.42, compared to Park facing an average rank of 404.53.
- In deciding sets, Muramatsu has a 56% win rate, slightly outperforming Park, who stands at 50%.
- Recently, Muramatsu has shown better breakpoint conversion, achieving 42.19% while Park has managed 33.33%.
Editorial Prediction (May 14, 2025, UTC):
In analyzing their recent form, Muramatsu demonstrates stronger return game statistics, particularly excelling in both first and second serve returns. This indicates an ability to control the flow of play more effectively than Park.
Muramatsu’s superior breakpoint conversion rate suggests they capitalize on opportunities better, an important edge in a tightly contested match.
Although Park showcases slight strengths, such as in saving breakpoints and second serve performance, Muramatsu’s consistent head-to-head advantages on harder surfaces and against stronger opponents suggest a greater overall resilience and adaptability.
Given these factors, Muramatsu is predicted to be the likely winner of the upcoming tennis match.
Chihiro Muramatsu vs Sohyun Park Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Muramatsu vs S. Park H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 18 | Games Won | 10 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:53:39 | Average Match Time | 2:53:39 |
| 70% (66/94) | 1st Serve % | 49% (40/82) |
| 56% (37/66) | 1st Serve Win % | 55% (22/40) |
| 57% (16/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 43% (18/42) |
| 53% (8/15) | Break Pts Won % | 57% (4/7) |
| 51% (42/82) | Return Points Win % | 44% (41/94) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Muramatsu Recent Matches Played
S. Park Recent Matches Played

C. Muramatsu vs S. Park Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.58% (289/231) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.22% (221/140) |
| 54.82% (648/534) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.42% (472/350) |
| 52.10% (5534/5088) | Games Win/Loss | 53.35% (3938/3443) |
| 57.94% (219/159) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.00% (117/78) |
| 46.67% (42/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.23% (88/49) |
| 53.85% (21/18) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.56% (15/12) |
| 53.85% (7/6) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.09 |
| 132 | Aces Total | 332 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
| 814 | Total Double Faults | 844 |
| 1:38:20 | Average Match Time | 1:36:1 |
| 536.14 | Average Opponent Rank | 477.42 |
| 72% (21070/29183) | 1st Serve % | 61% (13358/22002) |
| 57% (11905/21070) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (7973/13358) |
| 46% (3724/8112) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (3877/8644) |
| 48% (1900/3973) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1498/2984) |
| 47% (13993/29855) | Return Points Win % | 49% (10565/21736) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 46.15% (6/7) |
| 37.50% (6/10) | Main Tour W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 55.30% (240/194) | Challenger W/L | 60.63% (154/100) |
| 65.08% (41/22) | Futures W/L | 69.05% (58/26) |
| 55% (283/514) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (218/355) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 53% (45/85) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (32/59) |
| 49% (69/142) | Deciding Set Win % | 70% (70/100) |
| 87% (279/244) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (202/187) |
| 13% (279/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (202/15) |
| 19% (241/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (159/33) |