Chihiro Muramatsu vs Amelia Zylberman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

When anticipating the upcoming tennis match between Zylberman and Muramatsu, their performance on second serves emerges as a key predictive factor. In recent months, Zylberman has managed to secure 40.8% of points with their second serve, slightly outperforming Muramatsu, who won 38.75%. This metric is highly correlated with the accuracy of match predictions.

Examining the return game stats further bolsters the prediction analysis. Muramatsu has demonstrated strength by winning 52.67% of their opponents' second serve points, surpassing Zylberman's 45.45% in the same area. Additionally, for first serve returns, Muramatsu edges slightly ahead with 38.31% compared to Zylberman's 37.68%, suggesting a slight edge in head-to-head matchups.

Under pressure, Zylberman has shown the capability to save 50% of breakpoints recently, whereas Muramatsu is closely behind at 49.82%. This statistic is particularly useful for making in-game betting predictions. Moreover, when it comes to converting breakpoints, Zylberman leads with a 41.56% conversion rate, compared to Muramatsu's 39.27%.

Looking at performance over the last year, Zylberman has won 26.67% of their matches (W/L 4/11), contrasted with Muramatsu's more favorable 59.09% (W/L 39/27) win rate. Such performance overview suggests Muramatsu may be preferred based on recent form.

The favorite playing surface is a crucial factor in these predictions. Zylberman’s best performance surface is Hard, with a 39% win rate, while Muramatsu excels on Hard courts with a 58% win rate. Given these stats, both players seem to have a preference for Hard surfaces, yet Muramatsu has evidenced greater success.

Considering the competition level, Zylberman primarily competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments over $10K, achieving a 23.08% win rate, whereas Muramatsu has been more prolific in the same level tournaments, with a 59.26% win rate. This reflects Muramatsu's higher level of competition success relative to Zylberman.

Moreover, Zylberman has faced opponents with an average rank of 194.13 over the past year, significantly higher than Muramatsu's 354.62 average opponent rank. This suggests that Zylberman is accustomed to facing tougher competition, although Muramatsu has better outcomes against lower-ranked opponents.

Deciding set performance can significantly influence the match's outcome. Zylberman has struggled in this area with no deciding sets won in the past 12 months, whereas Muramatsu has a 58% success rate in deciding sets. This statistic favors Muramatsu for live predictions in matches extending to a deciding set.

Weighing these collected statistics and comparisons, Muramatsu is favored to win the upcoming match against Zylberman. Their stronger recent form, success in crucial match moments, and overall performance metrics suggest they have the upper hand in this encounter.