Charlotte Narti vs Dune Vaissaud Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 10:16 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Narti vs D. Vaissaud

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win

FRA
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Narti 0 - 1 Vaissaud
They have played 2 sets in total, with Charlotte Narti winning 0 and Dune Vaissaud winning 2. The last match between Dune Vaissaud and Charlotte Narti was at the W15 Monastir, 22-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Dune Vaissaud getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Narti | 0 |
| Vaissaud | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Monastir(10-22-25)
C. Narti vs D. Vaissaud H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 69.23% (9-4) | Career Total W/L | 61.70% (29-18) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
C. Narti vs D. Vaissaud Match Preview:
- Charlotte Narti has a slight edge in second serve points won, securing 3.25% more compared to Dune Vaissaud.
- In return game performance, Dune Vaissaud leads with better stats, winning 52.66% of opponents' second serve points over Charlotte's 48.74%.
- How crucial is the first serve return game? Both players are almost equal, with Charlotte at 33.57% and Dune at 33.39%.
- Under pressure, particularly on breakpoints, Dune shines by saving a higher percentage, which can be critical during tight matches.
- Which player has been performing better overall in the past year? Charlotte has a higher match win rate of 80% compared to Dune's 62.16%.
- When it comes to surface preference, both excel on Hard courts, each boasting a perfect record on this surface.
- Considering opponent quality, Dune has faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 233.46, unlike Charlotte, who faced unranked players.
- Could a deciding set impact the match outcome? Charlotte excels here, having won all deciding sets recently, compared to Dune's 36% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
Charlotte Narti shows a slight advantage in second serve effectiveness, which can play a critical role in demanding matches. However, Dune Vaissaud displays superior return game statistics, particularly against opponents' second serves, which may counterbalance Charlotte's serve strengths.
Despite Charlotte’s higher overall match-winning percentage in the past year, Dune's ability to perform under breakpoint pressure could be pivotal, possibly preventing Charlotte from capitalizing on crucial opportunities. Both players are equally competent on Hard courts, suggesting the surface may not favor one over the other.
Charlotte may find an edge if the match extends into a deciding set, given her perfect record in such scenarios. However, Dune's experience against higher-ranked opponents could translate into strategic advantages and resilience during high-stakes moments.
Factoring all elements considered, Dune Vaissaud’s proficiency in return games and handling pressure situations may give her the slight edge needed to emerge victorious in this closely contested match.
Charlotte Narti vs Dune Vaissaud Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Narti vs D. Vaissaud H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 4 | Games Won | 12 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:2:52 | Average Match Time | 1:2:52 |
| 49% (20/41) | 1st Serve % | 61% (33/54) |
| 45% (9/20) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (22/33) |
| 33% (7/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 62% (13/21) |
| 25% (1/4) | Break Pts Won % | 71% (5/7) |
| 35% (19/54) | Return Points Win % | 61% (25/41) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Narti Recent Matches Played
D. Vaissaud Recent Matches Played

C. Narti vs D. Vaissaud Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 69.23% (9/4) | YTD Win/Loss | 61.70% (29/18) |
| 60.00% (18/12) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.68% (66/41) |
| 53.67% (161/139) | Games Win/Loss | 55.83% (541/428) |
| 66.67% (4/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.04% (29/17) |
| 71.43% (5/2) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 14 | Aces Total | 47 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.34 |
| 33 | Total Double Faults | 163 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:19:36 |
| 193.23 | Average Opponent Rank | 235.34 |
| 47% (179/382) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1534/2632) |
| 63% (112/179) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (953/1534) |
| 44% (90/203) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (490/1098) |
| 53% (21/40) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (176/349) |
| 45% (185/411) | Return Points Win % | 48% (1235/2551) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 69.23% (9/4) | Futures W/L | 62.22% (28/17) |
| 69% (9/13) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (29/47) |
| 33% (1/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 14% (1/7) |
| 100% (4/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (5/13) |
| 100% (8/8) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (32/27) |
| 0% (8/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (32/5) |
| 20% (5/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (15/2) |